- Joined
- Oct 15, 2014
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 98
Hello Pain Docs,
Recently matched pain fellow here. While I am excited for my next year of training, I am a bit bummed about my match to be honest. It's a solid, big-name program with mainly B&B, SCS trials and permanents, and some PNS, but not a ton more. No Kypho (IR does them), pumps (neurosurg does these, though very few), vertiflex, or intracept. During my interview the program argued that many of those advanced procedures are still less proven, and most pain docs in the community don't do them. The chair also pointed out that their focus was on understanding anatomy and pathophysiology, and that with those any strong pain doc could learn whatever new procedures come into vogue. However, the programs I ranked more highly all viewed these types of procedures as cutting-edge and an important part of pain training.
To be honest, I was very excited about being exposed to all these advanced procedures, and worry that doing none of them in fellowship will mean I won't feel comfortable doing them as an attending. I would prefer to at least do a couple of each while in a training environment and decide if I want them to be part of my practice.
So wondering what the community's thoughts are. Am I making too big of a deal of these less-common procedures? Is it something I could pick up during my first job or through industry courses? I suppose I am committed to my fellowship at this point, since backing out which virtually ensure I wouldn't match again. I just want to make sure I set myself up to have any type of practice down the road, and want to avoid closing any doors.
Thanks in advance. I am sure part of this is just the disappointment of falling on my rank list. Part of life I suppose.
Recently matched pain fellow here. While I am excited for my next year of training, I am a bit bummed about my match to be honest. It's a solid, big-name program with mainly B&B, SCS trials and permanents, and some PNS, but not a ton more. No Kypho (IR does them), pumps (neurosurg does these, though very few), vertiflex, or intracept. During my interview the program argued that many of those advanced procedures are still less proven, and most pain docs in the community don't do them. The chair also pointed out that their focus was on understanding anatomy and pathophysiology, and that with those any strong pain doc could learn whatever new procedures come into vogue. However, the programs I ranked more highly all viewed these types of procedures as cutting-edge and an important part of pain training.
To be honest, I was very excited about being exposed to all these advanced procedures, and worry that doing none of them in fellowship will mean I won't feel comfortable doing them as an attending. I would prefer to at least do a couple of each while in a training environment and decide if I want them to be part of my practice.
So wondering what the community's thoughts are. Am I making too big of a deal of these less-common procedures? Is it something I could pick up during my first job or through industry courses? I suppose I am committed to my fellowship at this point, since backing out which virtually ensure I wouldn't match again. I just want to make sure I set myself up to have any type of practice down the road, and want to avoid closing any doors.
Thanks in advance. I am sure part of this is just the disappointment of falling on my rank list. Part of life I suppose.