- Joined
- Aug 20, 2021
- Messages
- 49
- Reaction score
- 15
Hi everyone, I was hoping to get some input from the group on patients with generalized pain.
I'm getting a lot of referrals for patients with fibromyalgia. Majority of these patients have been tried on standard medications and have tried conservative measures. When I get these referral (the centre I work at does not screen consults and accepts all referrals) it's typically something along the lines of "cervical myelopathy" or "cervical, thoracic and lumbar radiculopathy":
In my opinion, these patients are best served by a multidisciplinary setting. In my area, this is only available at the academic center. Unfortunately most of these patients are either rejected from that clinic or have previously been seen and nothing has been offered/worked for them (oftentimes including multiple interventional treatments).
I find it difficult to reconcile when these patients do have some abnormalities on the MRI such as Central or foraminal stenosis. But when I try to get the history they have pain starting from the ears all the way down. It is hard for them to distinguish from a radicular pattern because there's overlapping diffuse pain. They also Express multiple symptoms like balance concerns etc. On the BPI they shade in the entire body for their location of pain. The dilemma that I have is discussing interventions with these patients --it's hard to know whether it is asymptomatic imaging finding at this point or there's an overlap and they are unable to distinguish the symptoms. I educate them on what I think is going on. In fellowship, these patients would typically be filtered out and sent to the cbt, psychology, aquafit class and pain programming pathways so we would not see as much of them.
I did try interventions on some of these patients and they always ended up having new symptoms afterwards. When I did try a nerve block or an epidural and it did not alleviate any symptoms I tried to explain to the patients that this is likely not the cause of their pain but the majority of them are extremely disappointed and push for surgical opinion. I've had a few patients make the claim that injections don't treat these conditions so they still have "nerve issues". I did send some to our surgical group and they were never a surgical candidate. I don't want to overwhelm the burden of referrals to my surgeons but the same time I find a lot of these patients don't accept my opinion on the matter.
We've all had these patients that are unable to provide a clear history. How do you guys counsel these patients and which one of them do you actually take for interventions? My second question would be if we are liable if we refuse an intervention on these patients based on our clinical judgment or referral to a surgeon and something becomes of their issues?
I appreciate any thoughts on the matter.
I'm getting a lot of referrals for patients with fibromyalgia. Majority of these patients have been tried on standard medications and have tried conservative measures. When I get these referral (the centre I work at does not screen consults and accepts all referrals) it's typically something along the lines of "cervical myelopathy" or "cervical, thoracic and lumbar radiculopathy":
In my opinion, these patients are best served by a multidisciplinary setting. In my area, this is only available at the academic center. Unfortunately most of these patients are either rejected from that clinic or have previously been seen and nothing has been offered/worked for them (oftentimes including multiple interventional treatments).
I find it difficult to reconcile when these patients do have some abnormalities on the MRI such as Central or foraminal stenosis. But when I try to get the history they have pain starting from the ears all the way down. It is hard for them to distinguish from a radicular pattern because there's overlapping diffuse pain. They also Express multiple symptoms like balance concerns etc. On the BPI they shade in the entire body for their location of pain. The dilemma that I have is discussing interventions with these patients --it's hard to know whether it is asymptomatic imaging finding at this point or there's an overlap and they are unable to distinguish the symptoms. I educate them on what I think is going on. In fellowship, these patients would typically be filtered out and sent to the cbt, psychology, aquafit class and pain programming pathways so we would not see as much of them.
I did try interventions on some of these patients and they always ended up having new symptoms afterwards. When I did try a nerve block or an epidural and it did not alleviate any symptoms I tried to explain to the patients that this is likely not the cause of their pain but the majority of them are extremely disappointed and push for surgical opinion. I've had a few patients make the claim that injections don't treat these conditions so they still have "nerve issues". I did send some to our surgical group and they were never a surgical candidate. I don't want to overwhelm the burden of referrals to my surgeons but the same time I find a lot of these patients don't accept my opinion on the matter.
We've all had these patients that are unable to provide a clear history. How do you guys counsel these patients and which one of them do you actually take for interventions? My second question would be if we are liable if we refuse an intervention on these patients based on our clinical judgment or referral to a surgeon and something becomes of their issues?
I appreciate any thoughts on the matter.