Interventional stethoscopy is a new and upcoming modality that many cardiologists are now using. Anybody know how hard it is to match? What is the job outlook looking like?
Interventional stethoscopy was pioneered by Dr. Allan Schwartz, the Seymour Milstein and Harold Ames Hatch Professor of Clinical Medicine at Columbia University. It was initially heralded as the most significant breakthrough in the field of cardiovascular disease since the advent of percutaneous sphygmomanometry. However, an unfortunate set of circumstances would soon derail a once promising field.
One patient, Deborah Peel, was admitted to the cardiology service and prepped to undergo interventional stethoscopy without complications. However, post-procedure she developed atrial fibrillation devolving into more and more frequent premature ventricular contractions and eventually ventricular fibrillation resulting in death. These arrhythmias were linked to interventional stethoscopy by medical malpractice attorney John Edwards Esq., when he channelled the voice of Ms. Peel's
bundle of his in the courtroom. The jury was convinced, and now all patients undergoing stethoscopy must be pre-opped with the most stringent set of criteria.
Consents are obtained in triplicate prior to any actual stethoscopy being performed. Patients must be warned against bleeding, infection, death, and, of course, arrhythmias. Failure to consent before actual stethoscopy has resulted in the revocation of several medical licenses.
First all patients are prepped and draped in sterile fashion, and the anterior surface of the patient's sternum is coated with a penetrating lidocaine solution that not only anesthetizes the skin surface, but also acts to prophylax against any arrythmic activity during the procedure.
After stethoscopy the patient is monitored on telemetry for at least 24 hours to guard against any resultant adverse effects. Patients also require followup monitoring at 3 and 6 month intervals after the procedure.
The costs associated with performing stethoscopy has resulted in a demonstrable decline in the number of procedures being performed. Many cardiologists now instead opt for the less dangerous echocardiography.
So, to answer your question, the job outlook is bleak but matching is fairly easy.
Sincerely,
The Trifling Jester