Last edited:
Does it have bearing on acceptances?
Not much in my experience. It mostly just wastes everyone's time.
I wish this were true.I don't think alumni interviews/acceptances are as common as everyone thinks. n=1 here, but I know I have received multiple top 10 school interviews and yet was semi-rejected by UMichigan where my parent is an undergrad/medschool/residency alumni and donor. 3.99/41 stat wise. I think legacy admits are the one thing that everyone can agree is bad and so there aren't really too many people defending it.
Not true everywhere. Some places it makes a huge difference being related to or knowing the right people and can be relatively common.IMO it doesn't have bearing on acceptance. And it's not all that common either.
could definitely be something like this.At my institution, people are given interviews as "favors" of sorts for legacies or other "important" people. However, if they aren't otherwise qualified there is zero chance that they will get an acceptance. In some cases these people are interviewing with no real chance of actually getting an acceptance regardless of how they might do in the interview.
IIRC, legacy applicants have a significantly higher chance of an interview, and results in interviews that would have never really happened stats-wise.
Not to be bitter (and I'm not applying this cycle), but this isn't undergrad, where a class at a university has thousands and thousands of places... interviews themselves are limited, so wouldn't other more qualified candidates be shut out? :/ Does it have bearing on acceptances?