- Joined
- Oct 19, 2001
- Messages
- 2,264
- Reaction score
- 3
Hi all.
Just curious what all of you think of this... My prior research has been in astronomy, and I have just begun working on biophysics in the past week at the National Research Council of Canada. It's an amazing lab, and an amazing place to be.
Anyway, as you may remember, I am not a particular fan of the med school here, and I hold a very prestigous and valuable (over $30,000/yr) scholarship for grad school, that I will have to forfeit as soon as I start my first class of med school.
So, would doing a M.Sc. be a good idea? I would find out about the research in biophysics before committing to that as my research area? I guess the added time is a concern, but does anyone think that doing an M.Sc. first might cut down the length of time for my Ph.D. by a year or so? I'm only 22, but time is a priority for all of us MD/PhDs... That is the only thing stopping me now...
Just curious what all of you think of this... My prior research has been in astronomy, and I have just begun working on biophysics in the past week at the National Research Council of Canada. It's an amazing lab, and an amazing place to be.
Anyway, as you may remember, I am not a particular fan of the med school here, and I hold a very prestigous and valuable (over $30,000/yr) scholarship for grad school, that I will have to forfeit as soon as I start my first class of med school.
So, would doing a M.Sc. be a good idea? I would find out about the research in biophysics before committing to that as my research area? I guess the added time is a concern, but does anyone think that doing an M.Sc. first might cut down the length of time for my Ph.D. by a year or so? I'm only 22, but time is a priority for all of us MD/PhDs... That is the only thing stopping me now...