- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Preface: I did make a new account to post this. I have been active on sdn since medical school started, and I want to have some anonymity for this post
-
Far and away, Michigan and UAB are my top two choices. Geographically, I live almost equidistant from the two programs. I realize that they are quite different, but in many regards very similar. I’m really 50/50. While I know that I probably cannot go wrong with either, I would like some feedback from my friends here on sdn!
-
As I see it:
-
Michigan: I think Michigan has the edge on national prestige and research opportunities, and they certainly have more in-house fellowship opportunities (especially peds and cards). I liked Michigan’s post-post-call PACU days. I also liked Ann Arbor much more than Birmingham (though the surrounding areas of Birmingham are very nice). I definitely liked the residents at Michigan a lot more as well. My concerns were about the very strong surgical intern year, seemingly high amount of time in the ICU (minimum 6 months, often more), and seemingly moderate regional experience (but not weak), as well as the high cost of living in Ann Arbor. They also have no moonlighting opportunities (I have a family, and yes that extra bit of money is helpful!). My other concern was that it sounded a bit like a workhorse program. I’m not trying to complain about hours – but they seemed to be in the rooms late into 5-7pm much more often, and had some of the later hours of a lot of the programs. Also, the little to no time for electives as a CA3?
-
UAB: It seemed that the UAB residents were equally experienced, and certainly they were really nice too. Their regional is stronger, but the CRNA-in-the-room peds experience is weird. I also liked their breadth of call (alternating between OB and trauma call seemed advantageous). I also liked their LEAD program, which I think I would certainly pursue. They seem to have a better intern year, and more opportunities for electives as a CA-3. Of course, one of their huge selling points is their moonlighting – which is awesome. Their PD is really nice too. One caveat is that I don’t consider myself to be ‘southern’ at all (I don’t hunt or fish), so would I be out of place? Birmingham definitely has the edge with weather, and the cost of living in Birmingham is nice. However, I was definitely sketched out by the city of Birmingham.
-
About me: Have a family, I may pursue a fellowship though probably will not end up in academics. I like research but it is not the most important to me. Any thoughts and insight would really be appreciated. I have been debating these two for a while now, and as rank list submission day draws nearer, I need some help and input. I would love to hear what other people think. Thank you!
-
Far and away, Michigan and UAB are my top two choices. Geographically, I live almost equidistant from the two programs. I realize that they are quite different, but in many regards very similar. I’m really 50/50. While I know that I probably cannot go wrong with either, I would like some feedback from my friends here on sdn!
-
As I see it:
-
Michigan: I think Michigan has the edge on national prestige and research opportunities, and they certainly have more in-house fellowship opportunities (especially peds and cards). I liked Michigan’s post-post-call PACU days. I also liked Ann Arbor much more than Birmingham (though the surrounding areas of Birmingham are very nice). I definitely liked the residents at Michigan a lot more as well. My concerns were about the very strong surgical intern year, seemingly high amount of time in the ICU (minimum 6 months, often more), and seemingly moderate regional experience (but not weak), as well as the high cost of living in Ann Arbor. They also have no moonlighting opportunities (I have a family, and yes that extra bit of money is helpful!). My other concern was that it sounded a bit like a workhorse program. I’m not trying to complain about hours – but they seemed to be in the rooms late into 5-7pm much more often, and had some of the later hours of a lot of the programs. Also, the little to no time for electives as a CA3?
-
UAB: It seemed that the UAB residents were equally experienced, and certainly they were really nice too. Their regional is stronger, but the CRNA-in-the-room peds experience is weird. I also liked their breadth of call (alternating between OB and trauma call seemed advantageous). I also liked their LEAD program, which I think I would certainly pursue. They seem to have a better intern year, and more opportunities for electives as a CA-3. Of course, one of their huge selling points is their moonlighting – which is awesome. Their PD is really nice too. One caveat is that I don’t consider myself to be ‘southern’ at all (I don’t hunt or fish), so would I be out of place? Birmingham definitely has the edge with weather, and the cost of living in Birmingham is nice. However, I was definitely sketched out by the city of Birmingham.
-
About me: Have a family, I may pursue a fellowship though probably will not end up in academics. I like research but it is not the most important to me. Any thoughts and insight would really be appreciated. I have been debating these two for a while now, and as rank list submission day draws nearer, I need some help and input. I would love to hear what other people think. Thank you!