- Joined
- Dec 26, 2004
- Messages
- 717
- Reaction score
- 2
Well? I've always wondered whats the most laborious, mindnumbing, and unfruitful thing you do. Prostate biopsies? Cancer Grading? Pap smears?
Mashing for lymph nodes in colectomy and gastrectomy specimens.Strength&Speed said:Well? I've always wondered whats the most laborious, mindnumbing, and unfruitful thing you do. Prostate biopsies? Cancer Grading? Pap smears?
damn you beat me to itmacrocyte said:I'd say searching for those 12 lymph nodes in a colon CA specimen.
I love it when you thought you found 15 nodes and then you show up to signout with 3. Then you gotta go back and try again. Then it's time to submit the fat baby! Then when the surgeons give you ****, you're like, "sorry, it's all in slides now...there's nothing to go back to...how you like them apples?"Pingu said:Frozen sections on some of the big head and neck cases suck.
Although colon lymph nodes pretty much take the cake for absolutely annoyingness. And it's always the colon i don't gross (the one that the PA gets) that has the nice firm lymph nodes. Mine has zero
My intense hatred towards clinicians who page me during the day while I'm working continues to grow and fester.Pingu said:I had a gyn onc case where i found about 10 large lymph nodes in the 'inguinal fat' that they gave me. That's ten on each side, or twenty total. The surgeon still wanted me to go back and look for more. "oh we felt there were more there in the fat. They might be fatty replaced" Yeah, i bet you 'feel' alright. Let's leave the brainwork to those with the brains, mmkay. Go back to making women infertile and free of leiomyomas.
Strip off the fat, then 3 easy steps:Strength&Speed said:if they give you a huge specimen....and its not always easy to see lymph nodes...how do you look at it all?
Strength&Speed said:Well? I've always wondered whats the most laborious, mindnumbing, and unfruitful thing you do. Prostate biopsies? Cancer Grading? Pap smears?
AndyMilonakis said:I love it when you thought you found 15 nodes and then you show up to signout with 3. Then you gotta go back and try again. Then it's time to submit the fat baby! Then when the surgeons give you ****, you're like, "sorry, it's all in slides now...there's nothing to go back to...how you like them apples?"
Strength&Speed said:if they give you a huge specimen....and its not always easy to see lymph nodes...how do you look at it all?
34 is my record. And that's after finding one lymph node in a gastrectomy specimen. Surgeon said, "you only found one?" I'm like, ok this case is going to end one way or another. I entirely submitted the previously compressed, searched through adipose tissue. How you like 'dem apples biotch! And this was after people told me, "that's omentum, you're not gonna find hardly anything there."Mrbojangles said:What is the most number of slides you've submitted for mesentary? I only submitted ten blocks after I only positively found three nodes in a LAR. I didn't follow up on the case because someone inherited it from me when we switched rotations.
Today's lesson: The key to surviving bloodbank and still keep your mind is to have a sidekick.yaah said:Platelet approvals. Especially dealing with *******es who have a parameter for transfusion (like, keep platelets above 50,000) but have no rationale for doing this. ****ing platelets.
deschutes said:Today's lesson: The key to surviving bloodbank and still keep your mind is to have a sidekick.
My sidekick is married.beary said:Is your sidekick cute?
deschutes said:Since you are coming to interview, I will tempt you with promises of wine, women and song... oh wait, wrong gender.
SLUsagar said:another great way...
strip (off the fat that is)...
and place it in Carnoy's soln...
wait a few hours (go take a long dump, chill out, godforbid preview slides), then come back, and LN's light up lighter among fat. You still gotta slice and palpate, but hell, you can see them at least.
I won't do a colon without Carnoy's.
AndyMilonakis said:34 is my record. And that's after finding one lymph node in a gastrectomy specimen. Surgeon said, "you only found one?" I'm like, ok this case is going to end one way or another. I entirely submitted the previously compressed, searched through adipose tissue. How you like 'dem apples biotch! And this was after people told me, "that's omentum, you're not gonna find hardly anything there."
Well, when a case is signed out, the diagnosis report has both your name and the attending's name. Clinicians will usually call the main path office and ask for the resident who looked at the case. That's when the "operator" pages you and tells you that the clinician is on the line and would like to speak to you. I think this is absolutely ******ed. Yeah, and I'm supposed to remember the name of the patient and the details of the case days to weeks after the case has been signed out. Yeah, like I round on this f*cking patient every morning and say "good morning, how are you, did you fart, did you **** yet?" so that I know these patients well. Yeah, and I'm supposed to put down everything that I'm doing and go hunt **** down for them at a moment's notice. Yeah, f*cking right...so not gonna happen.Mrbojangles said:Surgeons have access to your pager number when they have questions on how a specimen is grossed .
Pingu said:I have to add another dislike, namely that of the opening of the colon and the washing out of the poo. I'm all for the last meal when you are going to lose part of your colon, but I don't want to be the one washing it out!
Mrbojangles said:I also believe if you want an autopsy the patient must be prepped before hand.
deschutes said:"I have a platelet count of 163! Gimme platelets!!"
Sigh.
deschutes said:This wasn't the fault of the clinicians.
The parameter on this patient was to transfuse for platelets <100k. It popped up on my review list, yesterday. My job was to figure out why it was set at 100k, since as you can imagine very few situations require a platelet count of 100k.
yaah said:Here, 100k is apparently for neurosurgery and optho procedures.
.
yaah said:Because apparently, having a count of 50,000 at 2am when the procedure is at 9am is MUCH better than having a count of 35, and giving platelets immediately before the procedure. Because there is no documented count of over 50 and if anything goes wrong apparently a lawyer will **** on them.
we waste so many platelets and turn so many patients platelet refractory just so we can treat numbers.
Yeah, it's like you have to spend quite a bit of time orienting the damn specimen and then you have to sort out what the false and true margins are in relationship to the other 22 containers. Had a tongue and floor of mouth resection case yesterday that pretty much was the same deal...however tongue resections are not as bad as laryngectomies, I can imagine (haven't had to do any laryngectomies yet...knock on wood...I'm on call this weekend and receive all the big specimens).EvilNewbie said:The worst is when you get 23 containers for a head and neck dissection (albeit most are frozens) and have to gross in a total laryngectomy. I have done several and it still takes a couple of hours. Cystaprostatectomy is the second worse. Finding LN in bowel is not so bad, but opening an ischemic bowel is much worse.
Strength&Speed said:It is the brain, but I'm not sure there is good evidence for that
I unfortunately have to treat numbers too. Its ridiculous. I order 4 U of FFP the other day and have labs checked one hour after they are given, just to get a good number. No matter the surgeon won't come around to do the procedure (a simple pulling of a tube) until 6 hours later, when most of the FFP has worn off. Just so I get a good number on the chart though.
DrBloodmoney said:We have thresholds of 100 k for neurosurg, optho, and neonates... seems pretty reasonable
yaah said:Do you have evidence for this? I keep continuously looking for good research studies that provide evidence of appropriate threshold for platelet transfusion, and the best I have found are a few which study leukemia patients and suggest that a count of 10,000 should be adequate as prophylaxis for anyone who is not actively bleeding, and 10-20000 should be ok for anyone undergoing a procedure such as BM biopsy, central line placement, etc, even lumbar puncture. I also saw one study which said a count of 50,000 was adequate for even CABG procedures.
I understand the theoretical rationale for 100k for neurosurg and ophtho, as they are tight enclosed spaces where any bleeding can have disastrous consequences. But does a count of 100,000 really prevent more bleeding episodes than 50k or 75k? I do not really understand the need for 100,000 in a neonate with otherwise functional platelets, just with a low count.
Somehow, interventional radiology has corrupted these studies to allow for them to demand a count of 50,000 for anyone undergoing a procedure, whether it is thoracentesis or simply a PICC line removal.
Part of the problem is that doing such a study would be considered unethical, so I doubt it is going to change.
Green ink sucks ass. It runs all over the place. Red ink sucks ass too...sometimes you end up barely seeing it on the slide. I have to section and cut in a boob specimen today. Tons of motherf*cking fun. Oh boy! I can't wait. Boobs are the best!yaah said:Some of the boob specimens are a pain in the ass too - one today I had an oriented, but fragmented, 8 cm piece of fat without a lesion, and then separately submitted margins on 5 different margins. I hate inking things in multiple colors.
AndyMilonakis said:Green ink sucks ass. It runs all over the place. Red ink sucks ass too...sometimes you end up barely seeing it on the slide. I have to section and cut in a boob specimen today. Tons of motherf*cking fun. Oh boy! I can't wait. Boobs are the best!
AndyMilonakis said:Goddamn...I just got another segment of ass today. I gotta go elbow deep in fat again to search for those non-existent lymph nodes