- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 155
- Reaction score
- 0
What qualities make the difference between a doctor, and a really good doctor? Why?
What qualities make the difference between a doctor, and a really good doctor? Why?
I have to say that I would put two skills ahead of communication.... if a doc isn't intelligent, and isn't ethical... it doesn't matter how well he or she can communicate. I would much prefer that an antisocial but technically excellent surgeon opperated on me than a buffoon who doesn't know right from wrong, but can talk up a storm!
I tend to agree, communication is important, but if you don't know your stuff and lie, that's a big problem.
Some geniuses out there with their 3.0 GPAs might argue that one's intellectual prowess may also be a factor which would make him stand out from his doctor colleagues.
What qualities make the difference between a doctor, and a really good doctor? Why?
filling out your duke secondary?
i think the most important quality is for a doctor to be very good at curing patients. communication too, but i think ability is much more important.
Many great doctors will never "cure" their patients. There are entire specialties dedicated to alleviating pain, and/or dealing with degeneration where curing is simply not going to happen.
True... but what is your point in this context? If I go to a doc because I need to deal with degeneration or alleviate pain... I would still rather that he or she was extremely knowlegable/skilled and ethical rather than a good communicator. If I go to a pain clinic I hope that the clinician I see knows of all of the latest and greatest drug therapies availible and this would be more important to me than that clinician's ability to communicate with me about those therapies.
Would you realy go to a charming emotionally supportive doc who's medical talent was just "o.k.", over a boarish but brilliant one?
All this is really good feedback...now we help all those people who call that black mangled pulp in their chest a heart succeed on their interviews...darn...Imho, communication trumps technical curing because without communication you very often can't cure.
- Without communication, people can keep doing things that had them end up with the disease in the first place (especially when half of us die of heart disease).
- Without communication, people can end up in serious trouble, I mean I knew a doctor who doesn't follow up with patients even when someone called and called and kept asking for help.
Yes, you need someone proficient to carry out an operation. But that operation isn't going to help you if you do stupid things later that make you require a second operation, and a third.... Or if you don't understand that you have to exercise caution over the next 2 weeks or whatever, because it wasn't really explained very well.
Both are critical. "Hey, you have kidney failure, so lay off on x, y, z" isn't going to make you better if what you need is dialysis.
But, you know, sometimes communication is the only way of curing, just like technical expertise is sometimes the only way. But I think that communication is the only way of curing more often than technical expertise is the only way of curing. If you're absolutely great at communication, maybe you could convince a lot of people to stop eating wrong, and they can reverse their heart disease from that (yes, reversing is possible, non-surgically, in many, many cases, just from altering diet). If you're absolutely great at technical stuff, but nothing else, then you could cure (with no people returning for the same problem later)... uh... those who had some kind of accident that they couldn't do anything about, like a train wreck? I'm just thinking that if heart disease is perhaps the biggest medical problem, then the cases where just communication does the most good have to outweigh the cases where just technical proficiency does the most good.
The ability to not automatically jump across the room and punch somebody who starts the Emergency Department history with, "I have fibromyalgia."
If you can manage that you can manage anything.