- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 16
What kinds of %'s are new grads vs. experienced specialists getting these days?
In my 7th yr of OS practiceWhat kinds of %'s are new grads vs. experienced specialists getting these days?
Would you still recommend going into OS for private practice? How do you think it will change in the next 10+ years?In my 7th yr of OS practice
Most places 50 % collections
A few 45%
OS new grads shouldn't accept less than 45% as an independent contractor.
not sure what the future brings... insurance issues, national policy/ADA/AMA stuff, reimbursements, blurring of lines in clinical practiceWould you still recommend going into OS for private practice? How do you think it will change in the next 10+ years?
Getting paid by collections is nonsense in my opinion. Why should an associate's pay be based on how skilled the front office staff is at collecting? No matter what, the associate dentist provided at service at the time of treatment. I've told more than one owner, no thank you when they only want to pay on collection.
I totally agree with you, but lets look at reality. A GP practice only makes money on the collections. Not production. Production numbers can always look good, but are nothing if not collected. Collecting money owed costs money. If I were an Associate looking for a position .... I would want to know what the collection % of all production is. This % needs to be considered in your negotiations for employment.
The problem is that you would want to see this % clearly stated in the practice financials. Itemized for dental, hygeine, FFS, insruance, etc. etc. Many employers may not want to divulge their practice numbers. That's when you walk.
I am not a specialist, but I can speak to the percentage of production, vs percentage of collections.
When I was looking for my first associate job, I was wined and dined by a dentist who owned 5 or 6 locations, and had several associates. He offered 28% of collections, and claimed his collections were "over 98%". I had been warned that collections are very difficult to track as an associate, as often payment for procedures is not received for several months. I countered with, "that's fine, but since your collections rate is 98%, we stipulate that I will never receive less than 25% of (adjusted) production". He balked at this and I found a position elsewhere. Later met several of his prior associates and found out that he was known for cheating his associates, especially when they left his group, as he would then claim "no more collections came in", essentially stiffing them out of their last several weeks of pay.
The fairest way for all parties, IMO, is to be paid a percentage of adjusted production - adjusted meaning what is actually expected to be collected, counting discount fees for insurance plans, cash discounts given, etc etc (too often I see practices for sale listing some wild "Production" number, that is just counting all procedures at full UCR, which the majority of practices almost never get). This can be easily tracked by both parties, and on any given day the associate knows at the end of each day, how much they have produced, and how much they will be paid. When figuring out what amount to settle on, the owner can figure in what he knows, historically, his practice collects as a percentage of adjusted production, so that he knows to a very close degree what he is offering in compensation.