- Joined
- Dec 11, 2017
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey everyone, first time on this, but I really need to reach out to see if there has ever been another person in my shoes here.
I am a PA (pathologists' assistant)- many parallels to a physicians' assistant- I have a master's, national certification and state license as a pathologists' assistant and work under the minimal supervision of a pathologist in the hospital lab. I primarily gross surgical specimens and do some autopsies here and there. Anyways, ever since I was in PA school, I kinda knew that I wanted to pursue a PhD in biomedical science or anatomy/cell biology. I think now I am settled on biomedical science at this point.
Here's my question: how important is it that I pursue basic science research? I currently work in the hospital (about 40-50 hours per week) grossing mostly cancer specimens. With that, I have a great working knowledge of cell bio, genetics, physiology, etc. And with integration of "personalized medicine" in the pathology department (in medicine in general, really), I also have a great appreciation for the product of biomarker discovery and development (this appreciation is partially why I am so passionate about pursuing a PhD in the first place).
so with my experience as a PA (2 years experience so far), do I need to pursue basic research to be attractive to PhD programs?
And because I see people adding stats to their posts, a little about myself:
undergrad GPA 3.8- BS in Medical Technology (Clinical Lab Science)- I am also a certified Clinical Lab Scientist
GRE 70th percentile (may need to retake I suppose?)
Grad school- honors, school I attended is also one of the top 5 medical schools, US news
Please ask me any additional questions. I would love to hear if anyone else has tried to make the leap from allied health professional to PhD candidate. Thanks so much, Happy Holidays!
I am a PA (pathologists' assistant)- many parallels to a physicians' assistant- I have a master's, national certification and state license as a pathologists' assistant and work under the minimal supervision of a pathologist in the hospital lab. I primarily gross surgical specimens and do some autopsies here and there. Anyways, ever since I was in PA school, I kinda knew that I wanted to pursue a PhD in biomedical science or anatomy/cell biology. I think now I am settled on biomedical science at this point.
Here's my question: how important is it that I pursue basic science research? I currently work in the hospital (about 40-50 hours per week) grossing mostly cancer specimens. With that, I have a great working knowledge of cell bio, genetics, physiology, etc. And with integration of "personalized medicine" in the pathology department (in medicine in general, really), I also have a great appreciation for the product of biomarker discovery and development (this appreciation is partially why I am so passionate about pursuing a PhD in the first place).
so with my experience as a PA (2 years experience so far), do I need to pursue basic research to be attractive to PhD programs?
And because I see people adding stats to their posts, a little about myself:
undergrad GPA 3.8- BS in Medical Technology (Clinical Lab Science)- I am also a certified Clinical Lab Scientist
GRE 70th percentile (may need to retake I suppose?)
Grad school- honors, school I attended is also one of the top 5 medical schools, US news
Please ask me any additional questions. I would love to hear if anyone else has tried to make the leap from allied health professional to PhD candidate. Thanks so much, Happy Holidays!