But anyway, the 'top most likely' disease I was looking for on the DDx in this case was BASAL/SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA. ALL unhealed uninfected chronic skin wounds and skin ulcers in the lower extremity are at risk for basal/squamous cell carcinoma, a very vital important goal that wound care podiatrists should keep in mind of. The last thing to happen is to have a dermatologist and an oncologist hop on board.
Wow, huh?
I have to intervene here.
So for anyone with diabetes, hallux limitus and onychauxis we should be concerned for the above DDx????
I work in a major wound care center and have seen plenty of the above and have NEVER encounter this, with the hundreds of recalcitrant ulcerations I've seen and successfully healed. I'm sorry, but the DDx you were looking for has distinct signs to look for and are somewhat of "zebras", not horses.
I've followed this thread closely to see what in the world you were eluding to and am mystified by your approach.
Your methods in this thread are WAY off. And no, if someone is concerned with the above, it is imperative to BIOPSY if there are suspicions. THEN get others involved if necessary and a diagnosis is verified.
Not only that, but it is just as likely in a non diabetic, without hallux limitus, so why even mention those diagnoses? Statistically, it is actually MORE likely in a non diabetic without hallux limitus. ESPECIALLY with basal cell, which isn't a converting type skin ulcer. Having a chronic ulcer is much more likely to convert to Squamous cell, whereas Basal Cell is more likely a primary ulceration and not due to chronicity.
Sorry Dr. Hurly. This time, you may want to not give someone a hard time when they are absolutely right.