Radiographic terminology - injecting the SI joint

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

NJPAIN

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
2,666
Reaction score
1,687
Every time I encounter a challenging SI joint injection and mumble under my breath " there has GOT to be a better way" I re-review the techniques found in a variety of atlases. I then come up against the varied terminology utilized in the radiology vs. pain medicine literature. To avoid the confusion I wish to see how all of you interpret the following with regard to using a c-arm in the conventional position of image intensifier above the patient:

1. "Angle the beam cephalad"
2. "Tilt the C-arm caudad"

Are these the same or opposite positions??
What cranio-caudal angle do you use for SI joint?

Members don't see this ad.
 
The radiology literature is full of contradictions on the terminology. However, by using the term "beam" or "source" or "I/I" or "Intensifier" followed by any of the commands tilt/rotate/angle caudad, cephalad, rostral, superior , inferior, ipsilateral or contralateral oblique, lateral, A/P; slide/translate cephalad, caudad, rostral, superior, inferior; swivel/wig-wag cephalad, caudad, the angles are spelled out. Unfortunately, if there are different technicians every day, then you get a different understanding (misunderstanding) of the terminology used. Best practice: teach your technicians your terminology before starting with patients, and re-emphasize this terminology frequently.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I prefer to caudal tilt about 5 degrees and target the medial (posterior) aspect of the joint about 1cm from bottom. Most of the atlases suggest a little cephalad tilt to elongate the opening in the bottom of the joint... I find that trajectory more challenging and if go too deep puts you in bowel.
 
muck around till you fell the "knife going through butter" sensation...
 
SIJ injections are trickier than given credit for.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure I see a space when I oblique. Anyway I can't tell if the result if from capsule/fascial insertion injection or what.

Only the inferior third of the joint is synovial.

ANESTH ANALG REVIEW ARTICLE COHEN 1441
2005;101:1440–53
Anatomy
The sacroiliac (SI) joint is the largest axial joint in the
body, with an average surface area of 17.5 cm 2 (1).
There is wide variability in the adult SI joint, encom-
passing size, shape, and surface contour. Large dis-
parities may even exist within the same individual
(2,3). The SI joint is most often characterized as a large,
auricular-shaped, diarthrodial synovial joint. In real-
ity, only the anterior third of the interface between the
sacrum and ilium is a true synovial joint; the rest of the
junction is comprised of an intricate set of ligamentous
connections. Because of an absent or rudimentary pos-
terior capsule, the SI ligamentous structure is more
extensive dorsally, functioning as a connecting band
between the sacrum and ilia (4).

J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12:255-265


Anatomy
ThesacroiliacjointbecomesC-shaped
by adulthood. The sacrum is wedged
between the ilia. It is the largest ax-
ial joint in the human body, with a
surface area of approximately 17.5
cm 2 . It is considered to be a synovial
joint even though 75% of its superior
jointsurfaceisnotsynovial


www.sijoint.com

Sacroiliac Joint Structure
The anterior one-third of the sacroiliac joint is a diarthrodial (synovial) joint, with a hyaline cartilage surface. The remainder of the joint is comprised of a complex network of ligaments, more extensive dorsally than ventrally, which limit joint motion to only a few degrees. The joint surface is auricular, or ear-shaped, with an average surface area of 17.5 cm2. 4

The articular cartilage is thicker and convex on the sacral side, and thinner and concave on the ilial side. In childhood, the articular surfaces are smooth. In the second to third decades, the joint surfaces start to corrugate and roughen, with congruent grooves and ridges forming. These surface irregularities continue to deepen in the fourth decade, leading to decreased joint mobility, with progressive loss of articular cartilage and continued degeneration from the fourth decade on.

Although cartilage is thought to be aneural and avascular, recent studies have verified the presence of substance P and CGRP immunoreactive superficial nerve fibers sensitive for pain within the iliac and sacral cartilage, anterior joint capsule, interosseus ligament, as well as in the subchondral bone of sacroiliac joints in human cadavers. These findings support the concept that the intra-articular structures of the sacroiliac joint may give rise to nociceptive signals, though whether these findings are related to osteoarthritic changes and/or normal aging has not been established.5,6
 
Top