which would you recommend to med students considering these two fields? They seem to attract similar personalities and both have decent salaries and relatively benign training periods.
Are you a radiology resident? I don't think you have much exposure, or don't interact with pathologists much if this is your take-away. If you are advising medical students who are interested in these two fields, have them talk to a pathologist directly. Even though both are "diagnostic fields" they are miles apart when it comes to clinical practice, salaries and job supply. The "benign training period" you refer to is also very different for both of these specialties.which would you recommend to med students considering these two fields? They seem to attract similar personalities and both have decent salaries and relatively benign training periods.
Rads all day. Much easier to find a high salary. Same nice lifestyle that we pathologists enjoy. Only caveat is the AI career risk is a bit higher in rads.which would you recommend to med students considering these two fields? They seem to attract similar personalities and both have decent salaries and relatively benign training periods.
Yeah, from one of the bigger and more cited studies, Rads was more frequently sued, but Path had one of the largest median payouts of all specialties.Radiology has lot more interventional procedures which is a good thing. Pathology could definitely use more interventional procedures to show more value. Radiology job market is better. Your odds of being sued may be higher with radiology just due to the massive volume. Last I heard it was 70% (rads) vs 40% (path) for risk of being sued.