This is actually a question I've had for some time now, so I'd like to hear some other opinions on it. When one of your patients has a rash or other skin lesion, how do you decide when to wear gloves and when it's ok to palpate it bare-handed?
I have had attendings and preceptors who seem to love touching and rubbing every rash they find, and they never wear gloves. One guy I worked with last year frequently picked off keratoses with his fingernails. I assume most physicians know from experience which rashes are not contagious, but I mean, how can you always be 100% sure?
I saw a little kid with molluscum in clinic last week and I asked my preceptor if I should wear gloves, and she said no, just wash your hands really well. My feeling is that if you need to wash your hands "really well" that it would probably be safer just to wear gloves.
Thoughts?
I have had attendings and preceptors who seem to love touching and rubbing every rash they find, and they never wear gloves. One guy I worked with last year frequently picked off keratoses with his fingernails. I assume most physicians know from experience which rashes are not contagious, but I mean, how can you always be 100% sure?
I saw a little kid with molluscum in clinic last week and I asked my preceptor if I should wear gloves, and she said no, just wash your hands really well. My feeling is that if you need to wash your hands "really well" that it would probably be safer just to wear gloves.
Thoughts?