Hey everyone!
I have been struggling with this question since beginning the application process: are there benefits of choosing an OT program that has a certain focus (research or clinically based)? I know that most programs do a good job of balancing research and clinical skills, but there are some schools that slightly favor one or the other. I am very lucky and grateful to have been accepted to two programs for fall 2014 - but I am struggling to make a decision because the two are very different. One is more clinically driven, while the other seems to focus a bit more on research. While I do believe that a good program should be strong in both, I myself would feel more comfortable/able to succeed in a program that is slightly more clinically driven.
The problem is that the clinical program has a hefty price tag ($88,000 total for tuition alone), which is quite a bit more expensive than the research-based program I was accepted to. I guess I'm just wondering if anyone thinks that a certain program (research versus clinical) will better prepare an OT student to do well in Fieldworks or generally succeed as a full-time occupational therapist. I've heard from some students that all that "really" matters is if a program can prepare you to pass the NBCOT exam, but I'm just wondering if the clinical/research aspects of a program can also affect that.
I might be over-thinking this way too much (this application process has been stressful and has probably made me a tad bit crazy), but I wanted to ask all you lovely SDN users what your thoughts were. This post also was a lot longer than I intended it to be, so sorry for that! Thanks everyone.
I have been struggling with this question since beginning the application process: are there benefits of choosing an OT program that has a certain focus (research or clinically based)? I know that most programs do a good job of balancing research and clinical skills, but there are some schools that slightly favor one or the other. I am very lucky and grateful to have been accepted to two programs for fall 2014 - but I am struggling to make a decision because the two are very different. One is more clinically driven, while the other seems to focus a bit more on research. While I do believe that a good program should be strong in both, I myself would feel more comfortable/able to succeed in a program that is slightly more clinically driven.
The problem is that the clinical program has a hefty price tag ($88,000 total for tuition alone), which is quite a bit more expensive than the research-based program I was accepted to. I guess I'm just wondering if anyone thinks that a certain program (research versus clinical) will better prepare an OT student to do well in Fieldworks or generally succeed as a full-time occupational therapist. I've heard from some students that all that "really" matters is if a program can prepare you to pass the NBCOT exam, but I'm just wondering if the clinical/research aspects of a program can also affect that.
I might be over-thinking this way too much (this application process has been stressful and has probably made me a tad bit crazy), but I wanted to ask all you lovely SDN users what your thoughts were. This post also was a lot longer than I intended it to be, so sorry for that! Thanks everyone.