- Joined
- Apr 6, 2013
- Messages
- 848
- Reaction score
- 415
Wanted to get some feedback from the more seasoned folks out there:
I am a fellow on the job interview trail. At this point, there is a position that I would likely to take which seems just about perfect.
1. The practice does not prescribe at all, just makes recommendations
2. Good pay, partnership track, very well managed practice, etc
3. Reasonable patient load 25 per day is around the max
4. Partner is a sophisticated proceduralist willing to teach
5. No IT pumps, will do procedures that dont pay well because they believe in them, etc (basically they try and be ethical)
Here is my dilemma: I am hesitating a little bit before making the definite step forward.
The crux of the issue to me is that, honestly, all the negativity with the debates about the efficacy/marginal data of IPM really give me pause, and gets me down. It bothers me emotionally. Take this thread below:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...ination-of-spinal-injection-coverage.1180948/
Other large scale analyses by third parties seem to make similar statements. Such as the following:
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/DeterminationProcess/Downloads/id98TA.pdf
We could talk all day about how all these reviewers etc are biased, but I am not a conspiracy type, and honestly, probably the evidence just is not all that great.
I have seen people apparently benefit from the procedures we perform during this fellowship year, but how can I let anecdotal experiences trump the opinion of experts and summary of the published literature?
I went into medicine to help people. After all these difficult years of training, I dont want to take a good gig with a great lifestyle if I am basically selling people on something that is not realistically going to help them. I feel like even if some stuff about Anesthesia sucks, at least I can sleep knowing that I am doing some good for some people every day. I do understand that some of the surgeries we do are bogus, so Anesthesia is not 100% doing good for people all the time, but it seems much more clear cut to me.
Should I go back to the OR?
As a final complicating factor, my wife would be seriously bummed and hesitant about me going back to the OR's, due to lifestyle considerations. We have a kid, etc. (Really got my but kicked as a resident lol!) Maybe it is selfish of me to think this way, and I should just be more of a family guy is the right thing to do with the more reasonable lifestyle of pain.
I am not trying to be dogmatic, and I respect that chronic pain patients are complicated and we have limited tools, the alternative treatments are also poor, etc, so I do see both sides of the coin here. I guess the most honest option would be to just tell patients that spine surgery often doesnt work, opioids dont work, and IPM does not work, and they should just cope as best as they can with whatever mix of taichi/weightloss and exercise/psychology/quiting smoking/heat/ice/stretching/TENS/whatever else they feel like?
I had some of these reservations prior to starting fellowship, but I was so burnt out with Anesthesia I wanted to at least do the fellowship and gain more knowledge/experience in the field before I ruled it out.
I thought for a while about just trying to do cancer pain, as neurolytic procedures/tunneled epidural catheters/blasting these people with opioids is definitely efficacious and are meaningful interventions. But it seems that these jobs are not to be found, and oncologists rarely refer to pain docs.
Has anyone faced a similar dilemma out there?
I am pretty torn/stressed out as I am down to the wire with some of these decisions.
I was thinking maybe I will take the job and try it for at least a year or two in order to truly give it a fair shot, and then bail if my concerns continue?
Thank you for your thoughts.
I am a fellow on the job interview trail. At this point, there is a position that I would likely to take which seems just about perfect.
1. The practice does not prescribe at all, just makes recommendations
2. Good pay, partnership track, very well managed practice, etc
3. Reasonable patient load 25 per day is around the max
4. Partner is a sophisticated proceduralist willing to teach
5. No IT pumps, will do procedures that dont pay well because they believe in them, etc (basically they try and be ethical)
Here is my dilemma: I am hesitating a little bit before making the definite step forward.
The crux of the issue to me is that, honestly, all the negativity with the debates about the efficacy/marginal data of IPM really give me pause, and gets me down. It bothers me emotionally. Take this thread below:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...ination-of-spinal-injection-coverage.1180948/
Other large scale analyses by third parties seem to make similar statements. Such as the following:
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/DeterminationProcess/Downloads/id98TA.pdf
We could talk all day about how all these reviewers etc are biased, but I am not a conspiracy type, and honestly, probably the evidence just is not all that great.
I have seen people apparently benefit from the procedures we perform during this fellowship year, but how can I let anecdotal experiences trump the opinion of experts and summary of the published literature?
I went into medicine to help people. After all these difficult years of training, I dont want to take a good gig with a great lifestyle if I am basically selling people on something that is not realistically going to help them. I feel like even if some stuff about Anesthesia sucks, at least I can sleep knowing that I am doing some good for some people every day. I do understand that some of the surgeries we do are bogus, so Anesthesia is not 100% doing good for people all the time, but it seems much more clear cut to me.
Should I go back to the OR?
As a final complicating factor, my wife would be seriously bummed and hesitant about me going back to the OR's, due to lifestyle considerations. We have a kid, etc. (Really got my but kicked as a resident lol!) Maybe it is selfish of me to think this way, and I should just be more of a family guy is the right thing to do with the more reasonable lifestyle of pain.
I am not trying to be dogmatic, and I respect that chronic pain patients are complicated and we have limited tools, the alternative treatments are also poor, etc, so I do see both sides of the coin here. I guess the most honest option would be to just tell patients that spine surgery often doesnt work, opioids dont work, and IPM does not work, and they should just cope as best as they can with whatever mix of taichi/weightloss and exercise/psychology/quiting smoking/heat/ice/stretching/TENS/whatever else they feel like?
I had some of these reservations prior to starting fellowship, but I was so burnt out with Anesthesia I wanted to at least do the fellowship and gain more knowledge/experience in the field before I ruled it out.
I thought for a while about just trying to do cancer pain, as neurolytic procedures/tunneled epidural catheters/blasting these people with opioids is definitely efficacious and are meaningful interventions. But it seems that these jobs are not to be found, and oncologists rarely refer to pain docs.
Has anyone faced a similar dilemma out there?
I am pretty torn/stressed out as I am down to the wire with some of these decisions.
I was thinking maybe I will take the job and try it for at least a year or two in order to truly give it a fair shot, and then bail if my concerns continue?
Thank you for your thoughts.