I understand and agree with the advice to hold judgement on schools based on matchlists. A lot of DO schools put out a ton of primary care docs, I'd imagine it's got more to do with the type of students who choose DO (more primary care oriented) than the quality of the school or it's faculty etc.
But what I've always taken from Match lists is that students from that school were able to match into ultra competitive residencies. SOMA has some very impressive matches for this first class, neurosurg etc. I read that and take away the point that there's obviously not some fatal flaw that leaves student's ill prepared or un-competitive for whatever they want.
So yeah, tons of FP, Peds, or IM shouldn't be taken the wrong way. But if students are matching Ortho, Neurosurgery, etc, you can feel confident that the school didn't hinder them. Their training may have even been an asset.
I agree mostly, but remember your sample size. How many Neurosurg has SOMA matched? One? Two? That's not really enough to say that it had ANYTHING to do with the school. Those people may have gotten neurosurg regardless of what school they went to. There's one in every class. We had a guy who scored a 278 on USMLE 1. I mean, come on. Really? Had nothing to do with the school. He would have gotten a great score no matter what.
Do we have a great program? Yes. Does that mean that you too can get 270+ and match neurosurg. Not even a little bit. We've even match a couple neurosurg in previous years, and I guarantee that they were also mutants.
I would tell most people to really consider what they want to do in the future. DO school is wonderful, and all my classmates are just as (if not more) competent than the MD students I've rotated with. That being said, if you KNOW that you want to do a specialty that is traditionally less-than-DO-friendly (like neurosurg) you may be better off in an allopathic program.
Honestly, there are so few times that this becomes an issue that I wouldn't recommend one degree over the other in most cases. My exceptions are:
1) You really want a future in research. Few DO schools have any serious research going on. You CAN always start later, but if you know this is what you want, you'd probably be happier at a large MD university (not a community MD program, which in most instances is very similar to a DO school).
2) You really want a DO "unfriendly" field (or specific program). There are very few DO "unfriendly" fields. Neurosurg is possibly one. I truly think this is less of a bias, than an unfamiliarity because so few DO's go into these fields. This rule also applies if you really REALLY want to go to a specific program, in a given field that is known to have a DO bias.
3) You know you want to do a VERY competitive field. How competitive? Depends somewhat on your testing ability and motivation. If you're a good test taker, and very motivated, then Rads, Gas, etc are VERY doable. If you want Neurosurg, Derm, or maybe Ophtho...I'd seriously consider the MD world, simply because admission to those fields is SO uber-competitive already (and research typically highly prized, see #1) that statistically you're hurting your chances in an already crazy competitive field by picking the DO school.
Anyways, please don't make this into another MD vs DO fight, lord knows the pre-med forum sees enough of these. I truly don't think one degree makes better docs than the other. I do think certain schools (MD or DO) can benefit you based on your career goals and you should choose accordingly.
For example, I knew that I wanted to do private practice in a small-ish town, I didn't want an uber-competitive field, and that research is the bane of my existence, and that if I ever have to pipette ANYTHING ever again, I might seriously hurt someone. As such, DO school is perfect for me.
Anyways, every licensed medical school in the USA has to meet certain standards, and you'll get a good education at all of them. Go for the lower tuition, meet your goals, work hard, and you'll be fine no matter what.