I'm not *darkly* cynical, but I do find it odd that Vegemitosis erases and bails because he thinks that a Web-interfaced chat board is relaying viruses to him (!), and just when tl47 starts to express worry about Flinders:
tl47 > I have to say that the discussion on this forum thus far has left me a bit worried about Flinders. Especially vegemitosis who seemed quite positive about Flinders last year in the network54 forums, but seem to be a little disturbed/distraught about it.
But I have a bigger problem with Vegemitosis' assertion:
vegemitosis > Aus schools are ok as medical schools. Average, in my humble opinion. Those who compare them to US schools are just disappointed they did not get in there.
...which brought on the partial (albeit more verifyable, and thus valid, to a positivist) capitulation by trkd:
trkd > Maybe because we like the program we are in. I agree that going overseas was not the first choice for most of us...
Trkd, by supporting even part of V.'s argument ("first choice" stigma), you give his potentially more harmful (indoctrinating) comments additional weight -- the *presumption* that Aussie schools are (should be?) back-up schools. Certainly, there is some actual stat about how many int'l candidates/students feel this way. However, I will explain the case of one known exception:
I am American and will not be applying to American schools, or to Caribbean schools, or to UK schools, or for that matter to Israeli, Seychelloise or Qatari schools. I have mid-30's + 'S', reasonable gpa, and mucho clinical research and medical volunteer work. I know of at least one, maybe two US schools that will take me (associates = connections). So why go down under? Fundamentally, because of a whacky form of idealism that I won't go into at this time. Now, some tend to think that idealism = ignorance, but I asure you, I am well-informed, older, rather "worldly" relative to most 20-somethings, self-made, and ironically quite cynical (as above should indicate).
Some seem to hold the view that (paraphrasing many comments I've seen on the board), "if you care about medicine, then stop fretting/whining, b.c. after med school + (US) residency you're a (US) doctor, and that's what you're there for"...premise A: (US) medicine is the end; premise B: 4 years of "means" should be taken like a bullet for some greater end, as though the end is fixed, indeed The ideal, or even defined, when we look beyond.
Others seem to believe that those who defend Aussie schools vs. US ones have US-envy. Certainly, some do.
But, sometimes, some people who make some of the best doctors (IMHO), choose things because they are different (or quasi-exotic), or philosphically more in-tune with their world-view, or even because, and this isn't at all flippant mind you, "it's there" -- not just med school, but medicine, as a choice, as part of a larger transcendance (more akin to Sartre's type, as I am not spiritual), or as a partial.
I guess the issue I have is the presumption in many posts that candidates all really secretly wish they could get some good ol' American schooling, or that all that matters is getting that degree for some common goal X. THERE ARE NO INHERENT FUNDAMENTAL MOTIVES OR GOALS here, despite conventional wisdom. And assertions to the contrary are subtly arrogant, as they will only serve to indoctrinate and alienate.
-Pitman