In the real world we live in, our parent's decisions affect our lives and opportunities. Illegal immigrants are aware of the consequences of ILLEGALLY entering the US... and they are aware that the consequences also apply to their children. Their is a path to citizenship. It is long and difficult, but necessary. Admitting illegal immigrants to medical school over qualified US citizens is only going to amplify the issue at hand. Ignoring the fact that these people are here illegally and providing federal loans for their education will increase the incentive for illegal immigration to continue.
The path to citizenship is much more difficult to access than you make it seem. Otherwise, why wouldn't they just legalize their status? While some may knowingly enter illegally, you leave out many cases of human trafficking, exploitation, etc. How do you deal with them? Who said anything about providing federal loans? DACA approved students do not qualify for any federal loans whatsoever.
Not to mention that if they're given legal immunity for the purposes of residency training, they're getting medical training for free. It is "estimated" that training a single resident for one year costs about $100,000.
Medical training for free? How is it free? Just because you may disagree with a decision that Loyola took, it shouldn't affect what actually true and what's isn't.
Immunity for the purpose of residency training? What are you talking about? There is no legal immunity for anything. The DACA program was set up (along with the Morton Memos) in order to focus the resources of ICE on undocumented people are that are criminals, terrorists, and/or a threat to the nation/community INSTEAD of people that contribute to their communities (and this nation) in a positive manner.
You think we shouldn't have discretion in the way ICE (or the government for that matter) spends money?
Right, but there is something inherently unethical in making children accountable for their parents' decisions to immigrate - the parents can foresee that, but it still doesn't mean it's the child's fault or something the child should answer to. It's not like an immigrant child can choose not to immigrate.
Also, the argument for immigrant admission mirrors the argument for URM/under-served admissions - such people are more likely to go back and serve their communities. Unlike, say, the large number of you that will match into derm or gen surg and practice in a tertiary care center while entire communities have physician shortages.
While I agree, I don't think immigrants should be held to "lower" standards. Everyone has their own sets of obstacles. Let each application speak for itself individually. I really think it's important to have people that serve their communities--it makes a difference.
It's unethical for illegal immigrants to steal spots from legal US applicants. There were nearly 10,000 applicants for 160 seats at Loyola. I'm sure they could have filled their class several times over with qualified applicants.
Steal spots? How are the stealing? Is Loyola giving them an unfair advantage? From what I understand, Loyola is making DACA approved applicants eligible to apply to their program (based on their Jesuit beliefs). How is it okay for you to mandate what beliefs a religiously-affiliated institution are okay, and which are not?
They have yet to fill any spots with DACA approved applicants. And while there are nearly 10,000 applicants for 160 seats, shouldn't the best students be selected?
I understand where you are coming from, however I think it is foolish to compare this to the URM debate. URMs are tax-paying, law-abiding citizens of the US. This is not a debate regarding affirmative action. There are other threads for that, if you would like. This is a debate over admitting illegal immigrants to one of the most highly regarded and federally funded graduate programs in the US.
No one is saying it's the child's fault. Getting accepted in to medical school is extremely difficult. For many candidates, it is not as simple as graduating college and moving right on to medical school. They have to make themselves more competitive by taking post-bac courses, committing to hundreds of hours of community service, and re-studying for the MCAT. Candidates have to sacrifice to achieve their goal of becoming a physician. This same principle must be applied to immigrants. Their are standards required for admission, and they are not easy to achieve. However, like I've said, there are paths in place to citizenship for immigrants. It is not easy, and it takes a long time... but to qualify for a US medical education, US citizenship is (or at least legal status in the US) 100% necessary.
It's a bit unfair that you're implying that undocumented people don't pay taxes... considering the fact that in 2007 alone, the SS administration had receipts between 120 billion to 240 billion from undocumented residents. I guess that money came from nowhere?
Many state funded programs require applicants to be US citizens or Permanent Residents (making international applicants ineligible to apply), however requiring that all applicants be US citizens at those schools would create a lower class of permanent residents. Furthermore, international students are more likely to practice in the countries of their origin, so it makes sense for state funded schools to not accept them.
However, why are private institutions required to make the same policies? Do you think that people of other countries have nothing to offer? Many of the brightest minds that help the US grow come from different countries. There is no reason why we wouldn't have innovative, smart individuals learning alongside our students.
Now why do you say that DACA approved students don't have to sacrifice the same things? Did Loyola say that DACA approved applicants would be held to different admission standards? Who said immigrants are held to lower standards? If anything, they have many more obstacles than non-immigrants. I completely agree though, they should be held the the SAME standard. Right? Or should immigrants be held to higher standards?
People should follow the laws set for them to become citizens. After they have become naturalized and begin paying taxes, only then should they be allowed to enter our universities and receive our financial aid. It's disturbing to see trends where allowing illegitimate immigrants to be treated with the same regard as Americans is acceptable.
1. People don't receive financial aid if they aren't US citizens or permanent residents.
2. So you're saying that permanent residents should be an underclass to US citizens?
3. Access to education is a privilege? What about the fact that many state-funded programs are funded via property taxes? So you've got people that either buy a home, or rent... either way their money to going to pay for these programs. Its not okay for them to access educational institutions. Even if they pay higher tuition and fees?
Maybe you're saying that is how it should be, not how it is... either way, I'm not sure how being a US citizen is the only way that people should be allow to enter universities.