- Joined
- May 30, 2015
- Messages
- 404
- Reaction score
- 83
Which of the following could cause hypersensitivity?
B)I and II only
C)I and III only
D)II and III only
I is obviously true. I didn't think III was true since I hadn't really heard about antibiotic allergies, but I no see it is possible.
For II, relevant part of passage is this: "These symptoms of anaphylaxis are entirely attributable to the materials released by activated mast cells." I interpret this to mean mast cells releasing chemical will CAUSE anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity so II should be true. However, TPR interprets it as follows: "activated mast cells would be a RESULT of hypersensitivity and not the cause" - hence, TPR says II is false. Why is this so?
Also, in general, any tips to avoid semantics and cause-effect mistakes/misinterpretations like these?
- Ingestion of some foods
- Activation of mast cells
- Injection of antibiotics
B)I and II only
C)I and III only
D)II and III only
I is obviously true. I didn't think III was true since I hadn't really heard about antibiotic allergies, but I no see it is possible.
For II, relevant part of passage is this: "These symptoms of anaphylaxis are entirely attributable to the materials released by activated mast cells." I interpret this to mean mast cells releasing chemical will CAUSE anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity so II should be true. However, TPR interprets it as follows: "activated mast cells would be a RESULT of hypersensitivity and not the cause" - hence, TPR says II is false. Why is this so?
Also, in general, any tips to avoid semantics and cause-effect mistakes/misinterpretations like these?