- Joined
- Dec 17, 2010
- Messages
- 263
- Reaction score
- 1
Last edited:
When a patient is presenting with symtoms of hypothyroidism, what should should be given more weight in their treatment, symptoms or their TSH levels? Also, does evidence of CNS ischemia weigh into the validity of the TSH level? If so, can it still be given some merit clinically and how much? Can't find any literature on this topic. Thanks.
When a patient is presenting with symtoms of hypothyroidism, what should should be given more weight in their treatment, symptoms or their TSH levels? Also, does evidence of CNS ischemia weigh into the validity of the TSH level? If so, can it still be given some merit clinically and how much? Can't find any literature on this topic. Thanks.
it's funny you ask this; I had a patient with constipation, cold intolerance and depression. I thought for sure she had hypothyroidism, but her TSH is only 0.86. Given that it's so low, I won't even check a T4. she may just have all these symptoms separately and in medicine that is definitely possible. so I'll treat her constipation with stool softeners and treat her depression with an SSRI.
it's funny you ask this; I had a patient with constipation, cold intolerance and depression. I thought for sure she had hypothyroidism, but her TSH is only 0.86. Given that it's so low, I won't even check a T4. she may just have all these symptoms separately and in medicine that is definitely possible. so I'll treat her constipation with stool softeners and treat her depression with an SSRI.
it's funny you ask this; I had a patient with constipation, cold intolerance and depression. I thought for sure she had hypothyroidism, but her TSH is only 0.86. Given that it's so low, I won't even check a T4. she may just have all these symptoms separately and in medicine that is definitely possible. so I'll treat her constipation with stool softeners and treat her depression with an SSRI.
While old people get cold, depressed, and constipated all the time, you might as well get the free T's.
This is internal medicine after all.
she is 30 actually.While old people get cold, depressed, and constipated all the time, you might as well get the free T's.
This is internal medicine after all.
yes, but not always because of the thyroid...TSH is normal, don't need the FT4...but it inpt IM so prolly will get a bunch of labs most of which won't change medical decision making...just makes people feel better...
Sorry I should have included more info in my question. If the pt has had Hashimoto's for the 8 years, has been on a constant replacement dose of 75 mcg for the last 7 years and has not been managed (no TSH checks), now presents at the ER with a TIA, is diagnosed with chronic ischemic microvascular dz w/decreased cortical volume, resting pulse of 58, obese, low normal BP, free T4 1.3, and TSH 1.7. So my question is what merit does the TSH hold is treatment decisions now? Does ischemia to the CNS invalidate it? I would think that the hypothalamus and AP saved for the end?
Sure. And all those labs occasional find pathology.
If you're going to send the TSH looking for thyroid problems based on clinical suspicion because of symptoms and not screening may as well send the T's
and that would be the difference between the internist's thought process and an endocrinologist's...
Well I guess you can lecture the endocrinologists I trained with. The dogma I was taught was that if it's worth sending the TSH for a suspicion of thyroid issues, it's worth getting the T3 and T4 at the same time.
Well I guess you can lecture the endocrinologists I trained with. The dogma I was taught was that if it's worth sending the TSH for a suspicion of thyroid issues, it's worth getting the T3 and T4 at the same time.
Thanks. Your explanation makes sense. A little more information about the pt. She is post menopausal, has a normal stress test, ECG, and there are no signs of atherosclerosis. There are other signs of organ ischemia such as a BUN/creatinine of 25, eGFR of 83, mild pains consistent with ischemic bowel, memory problems, signs of dementia, and fatigue.
What would be the next step in her care? Thanks this is a confusing clinical situation for me.
So would it be appropriate to treat the pt I described by increasing the dose of levothyroxin by 12.5 mcg (from 75 to 87.5) due to the circumstances (average dose for hasimoto's is 125-150, pt has not been followed) and the severity of symptoms (bradycardia, chronic ischemic microvascular dz w/decreased cortical volume) and monitor the TSH? Or does the TSH of 1.7 exclude this treatment option?
it's funny you ask this; I had a patient with constipation, cold intolerance and depression. I thought for sure she had hypothyroidism, but her TSH is only 0.86. Given that it's so low, I won't even check a T4. she may just have all these symptoms separately and in medicine that is definitely possible. so I'll treat her constipation with stool softeners and treat her depression with an SSRI.
Student doctor network is a perfect place to learn and ask questions. Personal medical advice should not be given though.
To answer your question, secondary hypothyroidism would mean that there is pathology in the AP and that is why the thyroid is not producing and the pt is hypothyroid. In the case mentioned above, the pt has Hashimoto's where the thyroid is being damaged by the immune system.
This goes to my question. I am trying to understand the art of clinical reasoning thru a complex case where the standard algorithm may not apply and have not found anything on Medscape or Up To Date that has helped. This is homework but no assignment is due.
I read the guidelines for this specific issue. a normal TSH, especially as low as the one I got on my patient, means you don't get free t4/t3. in fact, they are not as good as TSH. TSH still is the gold standard.
now, if you have a patient with somewhat high TSH ie 2.5-4.1 depending on who you ask, then you get the free t4 and t3.
there is a difference between convenience and need...the OPs patient has KNOWN thyroid disease and on replacement, HAD a TSH drawn and it was NORMAL...at that point, there is no need for the FT4 and/or total T3...its not going to change your management...
if however the pt has no history of thyroid disease, there may be a place for the FT4/TT3 (as i did state in my previous posts).
the endocrinologist you trained with prolly realized it was easier to just not argue with dogmatic internists (but still shook their heads and rolled their eyes).
Thanks. Your explanation makes sense. A little more information about the pt. She is post menopausal, has a normal stress test, ECG, and there are no signs of atherosclerosis. There are other signs of organ ischemia such as a BUN/creatinine of 25, eGFR of 83, mild pains consistent with ischemic bowel, memory problems, signs of dementia, and fatigue.
What would be the next step in her care? Thanks this is a confusing clinical situation for me.