- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
- Messages
- 257
- Reaction score
- 138
Last edited:
Plus you gotta look good for OMM....Get in great shape and get a workout routine established that you can continue once school hits.
Plus you gotta look good for OMM....
/threadThe first couple of classes in medical school are typically Anatomy (the human body) and Biochem (metabolism). So for the summer before medical school I suggest studying as much human anatomy as possible at the beach, while simultaneously metabolizing ethanol.
I honestly could not disagree more.I would memorize the structures in your school s gross anatomy dissector, read a histology atlas, and read all of guytons physiology or an equivalent
If you have guts and want to demolish the usmle step 1 read Robbins basic pathology too
I'm not joking either. Reading all of this could be done in 2-3 months, add 1-2 more months if u decide to read robbins
I honestly could not disagree more.
Do whatever you want, even if that means sitting on your ass.
This is easily some of the worst advice I have read on SDN.I would memorize the structures in your school s gross anatomy dissector, read a histology atlas, and read all of guytons physiology or an equivalent
If you have guts and want to demolish the usmle step 1 read Robbins basic pathology too
I'm not joking either. Reading all of this could be done in 2-3 months, add 1-2 more months if u decide to read robbins
This is easily some of the worst advice I have read on SDN.
I hope it's sarcastic.Wait, I thought that was sarcastic advice.
Just no.
No.
I hope it's sarcastic.
I took a prematriculation course that covered exact material in my blocks, and can say it was a waste of time. Could've literally stayed home everyday watching Netflix and would have been better.
I think there's a difference between reading a textbook and taking a course that covers material.
I say to read through the textbook because it teaches and explains everything from top to bottom. I wouldnt suggest reading powerpoints, lecture notes, etc before the school year. but a textbook is different.
Ok but the textbook is not going anywhere and the clock is not running to take an exam. There is plenty of time (literally the rest of your life) to learn medicine. Take some time to be devoid of it after getting accepted.
Ok but the textbook is not going anywhere and the clock is not running to take an exam. There is plenty of time (literally the rest of your life) to learn medicine. Take some time to be devoid of it after getting accepted.
I think you'd need a special degree of commitment to be able to sit and read Robbins without ever having learning goals or lectures about the path.Nobody really has time to focus on all of Guyton and Robbins during med school. If you get a good grasp of it before you start, it's less stressful during preclinical years and board studying. Anatomy becomes a lot easier as well if you are familiar with most of the details. Dissection will be an extremely interactive review, i'd wager.
The biggest advantage is having a much deeper and better grasp and understanding of pathophysiology for USMLE, for which you dont have the rest of your life to learn.
It's obviously not necessary, but I think it can be a big help to lessen the "drinking from a fire hydrant" concept and adds another round of repetition which we all know is vital for digesting information
It's highly unlikely that primary learning done prior to medical school would have any impact on your boards.Seems that what people should do before they matriculate is subjective and for the record I wanted a more current up to date opinion rather than one thats from 2005, so yes I do know how to use the search key. I appreciate everyones advice. I do want to do well on the USMLE so maybe it would be a good idea to keep Robbins in mind. However I think I may save up some money and also take some time off to relax before matriculation.
I think you'd need a special degree of commitment to be able to sit and read Robbins without ever having learning goals or lectures about the path.
Seems that what people should do before they matriculate is subjective and for the record I wanted a more current up to date opinion rather than one thats from 2005, so yes I do know how to use the search key. I appreciate everyones advice. I do want to do well on the USMLE so maybe it would be a good idea to keep Robbins in mind. However I think I may save up some money and also take some time off to relax before matriculation.
We have PBL. I was saying that it's useless if you're not in medical school. I like Robbins.So... no PBL for you? We're practically done reading Robbins cover to cover and its only fall MS2. Could never imagine that with Guyton and Hall though. My God, half that book was torture.
Do not touch Robbins until at least 2nd semester. Without all the anatomy, phys, and histo reading it was akin to a middle schooler reading O Chem. It sounded interesting, I thought I understood it... yeah, but no. Now that I actually understand everything I read in it, I can really say how little I got out of what I read 1st semester.
If you want to study A & P or biochem, that's fine. Don't overdo it though. Nothing intense, just reading for fun.
We have PBL. I was saying that it's useless if you're not in medical school. I like Robbins.
We're systems at my school, a lot of things don't make sense to me. Or they make sense, in the limited knowledge base they are given in, but I don't understand the whys.Its a good book... if you've covered histo and phys. Guyton and Hall on the other hand...
We're systems at my school, a lot of things don't make sense to me. Or they make sense, in the limited knowledge base they are given in, but I don't understand the whys.
As a first-year, I already have a love-hate relationship with Guyton & Hall.Its a good book... if you've covered histo and phys. Guyton and Hall on the other hand...
It's highly unlikely that primary learning done prior to medical school would have any impact on your boards.
I dont get why people say this? Usually their reasoning is that "you wont know it in the context of things"
but to that, i say - knowledge of science is knowledge of science. If you read a textbook on medical physiology, youre going to know medical physiology.
That said, I would not read robbins without learning physiology and histology first (although robbins does explain a certain relevant physiology and histology ). like is commonly said, to truly understand the abnormal (like pathogenesis and pathophysiology ), you have to know the normal.
Is there anything any of you wish you would have done before you started school and what would you recommend I do (i.e. should I work and save up money, travel, do hobbies I love)?
False. Just because you read an entire textbook, doesn't mean you know jack. Especially considering the vastness of the material in medical physiology.
The minute benefit you would get from reading such a book for a couple hours every day of summer is negligible in relation to how much more fun you can have consuming a few beers and enjoying the sun and friends and family.
OP, do yourself a huge favor and chill all summer until school starts, drink a little drink, chat up some women, spend quality time with friends and family and accumulate a plethora of positive vibes you can reflect on when you hit a crappy week once school starts. Thank me later.
My apologies, I just saw this for some reason. Wow that sounds awesome compared to my PBL. Maybe I can try to convince my groups to do that next year for PBL. We have case based learning and it has to be the biggest, most inefficient use of med student time there is. Its med students presenting for half hour, then discussing googled diagnoses on two cases. Then there's low yield questions to answer on the 2nd day. It's literally wasting time, and it's mandatory! Our lectures arent mandatory. And we have it 4 hours/ week v. OMM 2 hours / week. How do I even reconcile this without going crazy?Well our PBL feels completely random at times - not really system or anything based. Like this block they clearly wanted us to cover path of one system, but at this point everyone is just trying to finish Robbins, so I'm doing cards path, CNS path, immuno path, WBCs, infant path, etc. in one block .
We choose what we want to cover within reason, but we have to fill 700 pages/block (1 block/month), so at this point its all random. Fortunately, this semester (fall MS2) most of the stuff is starting to make sense because we've taken enough sections & pieces of the different systems in 1st year (mainly spring of 1st year).
From what we hear from 3rd years, we end up covering basically all our text books at least once and Robbins once in the fall, and another time in the spring before boards.
My apologies, I just saw this for some reason. Wow that sounds awesome compared to my PBL. Maybe I can try to convince my groups to do that next year for PBL. We have case based learning and it has to be the biggest, most inefficient use of med student time there is. Its med students presenting for half hour, then discussing googled diagnoses on two cases. Then there's low yield questions to answer on the 2nd day. It's literally wasting time, and it's mandatory! Our lectures arent mandatory. And we have it 4 hours/ week v. OMM 2 hours / week. How do I even reconcile this without going crazy?
It'd be nice if we could get everyone to use an actual medical path book for the ddx, answering questions. That'd make a lot of sense.I don't know why some schools do CBL/PBL like that. There are a lot of MD schools around this area that do it in the same way as your school, but it really seems like every student I've talked to sees it as a time sink more than anything else. Its like they just decided it was a good idea, so they added it to the schedule without making it take the place of something. You just end up with more mandatory hours.
Ideally, you'd go over the case and really be able to answer why the docs did X, Y, Z tests, and had A, B, C differentials, but that's only really helpful if you are actually reading about those conditions in your books or reviewing in lecture. Maybe you can convince your group to bring in a Robbins pocketbook, an electronic version of Robbins, or something. At least that way you know you're getting good info quickly.
That said, there are moments in time where I'd kill to have some recorded lectures. Reading is great for retention, but it takes me forever and when I'm staring at hundreds of pages everything just starts to blur together. There are also moments where I just want a quick review of something I covered last year in phys or pharm, and FA just doesn't have enough explanation for me.
It'd be nice if we could get everyone to use an actual medical path book for the ddx, answering questions. That'd make a lot of sense.
Why don't you have recorded lectures? All mandatory?