- Joined
- Jun 21, 2004
- Messages
- 193
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey everybody,
I know a 30 is the rule of thumb but with my lower than average GPA, I'm trying to gain a little more insight as to what I should score to do well in the "numbers game". I have an undergraduate 3.2 GPA from a respectable school in biomedical engineering. After reading many many posts it sounds like a 3.2/30 won't get me very far. Do you think I need a 35+ or a 40+ to make me a solid candidate when it comes to GPA/MCAT or has my undergraduate GPA rendered me a hopeless candidate? I have a large amount of research experience in a variety of health-related fields (4+ years) and one published paper as a second-author. Any insights would be great! Thanks!
I know a 30 is the rule of thumb but with my lower than average GPA, I'm trying to gain a little more insight as to what I should score to do well in the "numbers game". I have an undergraduate 3.2 GPA from a respectable school in biomedical engineering. After reading many many posts it sounds like a 3.2/30 won't get me very far. Do you think I need a 35+ or a 40+ to make me a solid candidate when it comes to GPA/MCAT or has my undergraduate GPA rendered me a hopeless candidate? I have a large amount of research experience in a variety of health-related fields (4+ years) and one published paper as a second-author. Any insights would be great! Thanks!