Mr Tice was going to engage with us, about how APhA is our advocate, our protector.....yet the new BLS came out
15,000 new RPh per year, and job growth..???
15,000 new RPh per year, and job growth..???
Last edited:
Why isnt there a rule in place to stop new schools from opening up? I DONT GET IT.
What's not to get? Preventing schools from opening would be anti-capitalistic. Which organization do you think should have that authority?
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see that happen but I don't get why anyone thinks that could possibly happen. Even if there was an organization that had that power why would they use it to help gatekeep pharmacy? Is it just straight up wishful thinking?
Government could pull the loan access to pharmacy schools citing the zero percent growth in the profession. Actually they should do that for a bunch of programs and schools
In reality there are only 33 percent full time jobs. 33 part and 33 gig economyThis may be a legitimate reason not to open more school and may even be able to reason shutting down some existing schools. I mean, seriously... what kind of profession, especially one in which requires a freaking DOCTORATE, has ZERO predicted growth in 10 years?! This is put out by the US government for gods sake. The same government that claims to have lowest unemployment rate that does not distinguish chitty part time jobs from Lebron James’ trillion dollar contract. Which means, the pharmacy outlook is probably a lot worse than this report claims in reality...
In reality there are only 33 percent full time jobs. 33 part and 33 gig economy
Damn, being that median(or average? Cant remember) household income is in $50k ish.... household, not an individual income, i dont know how people make a living in this country. Smh.
What's not to get? Preventing schools from opening would be anti-capitalistic. Which organization do you think should have that authority?
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see that happen but I don't get why anyone thinks that could possibly happen. Even if there was an organization that had that power why would they use it to help gatekeep pharmacy? Is it just straight up wishful thinking?
They probably didn't even perform the study in fear of what they would find.AACP stopped publishing the demand indicator, probably got so many responses about a saturated market they kept it internally to keep applications coming
The AMA is able to protect the medical profession by limiting the number of newly licensed medical doctors each year. Unfortunately, ACPE doesn’t care because they make more money when more pharmacy schools open up.
Just like how in the future every single pharmacist role regardless of setting will require residency. Community, hospital, LTC, whatever you want. No residency? Then you’ll be seen as someone who has a license but no practical experience = PASS.Actually, it is the US government that limits the number of new doctors, by limiting the amount of funding available for the required residencies. AMA has nothing to do with it, nor is the number of MD/DO schools a limiting factor. Having a MD/DO does not qualify someone to be medically licensed, unlike having a PharmD does qualify someone to be licensed as a pharmacist (assuming boards are passed....but a MD/DO who has passed all their boards still can't practice as a doctor without a residency.)
Weren't they the ones talking about buying nearly half of Rite Aid back during the original Walgreens merger talks? I'm probably showing how little I know about corporate acquisitions but how would they have ever had a chance of picking up a bunch of struggling stores and becoming profitable?Fred's pharmacy to close all stores due to bankruptcy. This is going to hurt a lot of folks in the South.
Just like how in the future every single pharmacist role regardless of setting will require residency. Community, hospital, LTC, whatever you want. No residency? Then you’ll be seen as someone who has a license but no practical experience = PASS.