Would derm be competitive if....

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

MDstudent79

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Would derm be at all competitive if it paid on average $150k, most derms worked 60 hrs/wk with lots of night call, and the residency was a hellish 80 hr/wk constant....all other things the same about the specialty?

Just curious what most folks think here.

As a first-year med student, I'm just still a bit surprised that derm is one of THE most competitive fields. Obviously, the small size of the field is a major factor there. But if I would have had to guess where derm would fall in prior to getting into med school, I definitely wouldn't have placed it so highly in competitiveness.

Do most students get all worked up about derm after starting med school? In residency? Or are there really that many people dying to treat skin disorders? Just curious...no offense meant to any derms out there! :)

Members don't see this ad.
 
Would derm be at all competitive if it paid on average $150k, most derms worked 60 hrs/wk with lots of night call, and the residency was a hellish 80 hr/wk constant....all other things the same about the specialty?

Answer: Yes. In fact, it would be more competitive.

Explanation: You ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer. Would any job maintain its allure if it paid less, required more work, and required a tougher path to attain the position?
 
I am not a dermatologist, nor do I claim to know what motivates most people for choosing the field.

But you address several answers to your own question in your question, the reason that it is so competitive because there are so few programs, yes it pays well but so do other fields, but you can stand to make the same or more than a dermatologist in any field depending on how good of a doctor you are, and how hard you work. So I fail to see money as a motivating issue when picking the field.

It is simply supply and demand, the supply is very low, so the demand is very high. I also dont think the glory of derm is sought by only those that were born thinking they wanted to treat skin disorders. I think derm is for people that value the integrity and seek to learn as much as possible about the most important and protective and largest organ of the body. The implications of dermatology are found in every field of medicine.

I read posts on here all the time about ob/gyn consults, Infxs disease consults, pediatrics, FP, oncology, rheumatology, emergency med, neurology, almost every disease has some type of skin manifestation, but the skin can only react in certain ways. So dermatologists ( I presume) are people with patience that take time to ask questions, get good patient histories, and go to the source of the problem, and often there are underlying disease the require proficiency in other areas of medicine, but dermatologists are an important link in the chain of protocol, because you can treat a rash as any physician, but if that rash reoccurs any physician is going to get a derm consult who finds out more about the rash.

I hope that helps, again I profess to know nothing, thats just how I see it hangin out on the wards

Izzy in '08
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Answer: Yes. In fact, it would be more competitive.

Explanation: You ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer. Would any job maintain its allure if it paid less, required more work, and required a tougher path to attain the position?

I understand (and expected) but disagree with your response. Since the vast majority of people who go to medical school DO work long residency hours, have lots of call, and work more hours when practicing as physicians, clearly adjusting these variables alone does not make something not competitive. And since a very large number of medical students still go into family practice and general internist jobs, the average physician salary is not tremendously higher than what I stated--though it of course would be with most specialization.

Another case in point....consider orthopaedic versus thoracic surgery. Both are among the highest paid specialties, both require very long residencies (especially if one subspecializes in ortho, where some of the biggest money is earned), and neither are exactly "cush" jobs when it comes to working hours (i.e. both have call, have avg hours worked exceeding 50 hrs/week, etc.). Yet it is nowhere near as competitive today to do general surgery followed by a thoracic fellowship as it is to get into spine ortho surgery, for instance. And thoracic back in the 70s was one of the most competitive subspecialties, so I've been told.

So what I'm asking kind of boils down to....the "lifestyle" aspects aside....do such a large number (compared to spots available) of medical students really develop a passion for "the skin" and all its maladies? Or do you think there are a good number of students who are mostly attracted to the lifestyle, the competitiveness of the field, etc.--in the same way many argue that many students go into medicine itself MORE for the money, prestige of "getting that spot" in med school (akin to getting derm) versus the true nature of the job.

Again, I mean no offense. I've just thought it's an interesting situation with dermatology. And I always feel a little bad for those "average" med students that go into medical school with a real passion for derm (maybe due to diseases they experienced as a kid, burns, etc.) only to find out that you have to be uber-competitive to even think of the specialty--most likely (in my opinion) due to too few residency spots given the demand (most cities have very long waits to see derms, it seems) and (most importantly) the fact that many students become attracted to derm AFTER entering med school and realizing maybe they don't really want to be on call all the time and work 55+ hrs/wk after all.

Continuing the "no offense" warning...as a naive first-year, there just doesn't seem to be anything innate about the field of derm beyond supply and demand (which is not to be discounted, of course) that would necessitate having 245+ Step 1, AOA, etc. anymore than OBGYN, oncology, anesthesiology, or any other less competitive specialty. So it is likely quite a shock to the student who assumes derm will be of standard competitiveness given the nature of the field once they get out and realize it requires one to be among the "best and the brightest" typically!

Another way of asking this that's less hypothetical....Do you find once out in the residency and practicing that there are many derms out there who don't truly have a passion for "the skin" and begin to second guess their decision once they get used to the fact that they're working 8-5 and/or are no longer reminded of how coveted derm spots are among students?

And finally...note that I said "at all competitive" and NOT "as competitive." Of course I would imagine if you changed the variables discussed above, derm wouldn't be one of THE most competitive spots for residency as it currently is. But how much appeal would it have if those variables WERE changed a bit? The hours not quite so good, the pay a bit less. But everything else equal. Where would it fall in the grand scheme of things based on interest in treating skin disease and the nature of the work alone? Would it be like family practice, where essentially anyone can get into it? Or would it be more like EM or anesthesiology, for instance, where it might take a bit of work but is defintiely doable?
 
Probably would still be very competitive given the following,

- Ability to see a wide variety of folks from the very young to old
- Wide variety of procedures from cool plastics type excisions to lasers to sclerotherapy to light therapy, so a mix of surgery and medicine
- Outpatient setting, no OR but still get to operate
- Get to diagnose on the spot rather than rely on lots of labs and other ancillary tests to have any idea what's going on (kinda like the old school way of being a doc...relying on a good physical)
- Relatively healthy patient population that wants to come see you rather than a population that has to come see you
- Kinda cool being the doc that walks in the room seeing other docs all gowned up and afraid to touch the patient while you go in and know what's going on with the patient by just laying eyes on them
- No need to take page long histories...just a few screening questions and look.
- If you don't know, cut it out and look at it under micro and find out
- No more, oh by the way doc...on their way out the door...I've been having these chest pains that rad down my left arm.
-No more phone consults asking you to refill their percocets because they just can't take the pain anymore
- Need I say more
 
Probably would still be very competitive given the following,

- Ability to see a wide variety of folks from the very young to old
- Wide variety of procedures from cool plastics type excisions to lasers to sclerotherapy to light therapy, so a mix of surgery and medicine
-
- Need I say more

Well put and well said.....

I am not a dermatologist, and the chance of me matching in Derm is slim to none but its still in my sights because I developed a passion for it, and yes after I began medical school.

I am in Israel and the particular city my medical school is in, is one of the most diverse cities in the country, with a large population of Bedouin Nomads and Ethiopian, Russian, Ghanian, American, Argentian Immigrants, in addition to the Palestinians and Israelis, all with there own subset of skin diseases. Being this near to the dead sea we see a lot of psoriasis, but dealing with the nomads we see a lot of infxs disease like coxiella, brucellosis, and because of the diversity and non-diversity(consanguinous marriages w/in bedouin population) we are exposed to many genetic autoimmune, and cancerous skin diseases.

Derm is just amazing if you dont want to do the same thing all the time, I know the popping zits stigma, but I think thats more FP nowadays and derms are consulted on the more unexplainable stuff that requires biopsy, MOHs, or other types of immediate procedures.

Right now I am working on some research papers correlationg spinal trauma to brachioradial pruritis, which allows me to bone up on my neuro while throwing in the derm aspect. It really is an amazing field, all other perks and so called benefits aside. So even if the passion for derm came after I started medical school, its still passion, and I personally cant say i feel at all the same about most other things I have rotated through or experienced myself.

Happy trails
izzy
 
I know the popping zits stigma, but I think thats more FP nowadays and derms are consulted on the more unexplainable stuff that requires biopsy, MOHs, or other types of immediate procedures.

Maybe in a perfect world. However, thanks to self-referrals, dermatologists spend an inordinate amount of time managing mundane problems like acne, seborrhea, eczema, etc. that could easily be dealt with by a competent primary care physician. Sure, they get the weird stuff, too...but don't be fooled into thinking it's going to be one fascinating case after another. Common things occur commonly, so you'd best make sure you're happy seeing the common stuff that occurs in your field, no matter what field you're in.
 
Probably would still be very competitive given the following,

Disagree, because you just outlined the life of a surgical specialist (generalized), with the exception of the pain meds (which quickly is managed by being a hard-ass).

I know a guy that was a dermatologist in India, who said that it wasn't competitive there, because there wasn't any money. If you wanted it, you could get it. He did IM here in the US.

And, as far as:

Kinda cool being the doc that walks in the room seeing other docs all gowned up and afraid to touch the patient while you go in and know what's going on with the patient by just laying eyes on them

Huh? Where are you at? For one, that is NOT specific to derm, and especially NOT applicable, compared to several other specialties and subspecialties. The most common word I ever heard out of derm (at Duke - you don't get much closer to the top of the mountain or tip of the spear) was "probably".

Anyways, your post is contradictory anyhow. You say "relying on a good physical exam", but only a "few screening questions", and no page-long histories - huh?, and you say "Get to diagnose on the spot rather than rely on lots of labs and other ancillary tests to have any idea what's going on", but, just after, "If you don't know, cut it out and look at it under micro and find out". Are you IN derm, or just hoping?
 
All I'm saying is that when derm does get consulted (like any specialty), it's usually because the referring doc has no clue what's going on with the patient. That aspect of it is very exciting. True, that's pretty common across all the specialty fields. Skin is cool cause you see it right away. As for "probably" comment, I've seen many a specialist throw out a differential because they're entertaining multiple diagnoses that may have the same clinical picture. As for contradictory statements, I'm throwing out stuff that just comes to mind. I see many of the docs I've rotated with not spend too much time examining the patient. Granted, neither does derm for that matter but you're just looking at skin. What I meant to say was that derm relies on laying eyes on the patient more than a lot of fields these days because of the multiple of diagnostic applications. I think that's pretty neat. Not really looking to get into an argument about semantics...just stating things that come to mine. Definitely, my bias...but I don't think they're far off but then who does? Yes, I'm starting PGY-1 derm at a top 10 school after a finish my prelim med year...this year can't end fast soon enough. Good luck to you.
 
Would derm be at all competitive if it paid on average $150k, most derms worked 60 hrs/wk with lots of night call, and the residency was a hellish 80 hr/wk constant....all other things the same about the specialty?

Just curious what most folks think here.

As a first-year med student, I'm just still a bit surprised that derm is one of THE most competitive fields. Obviously, the small size of the field is a major factor there. But if I would have had to guess where derm would fall in prior to getting into med school, I definitely wouldn't have placed it so highly in competitiveness.

Do most students get all worked up about derm after starting med school? In residency? Or are there really that many people dying to treat skin disorders? Just curious...no offense meant to any derms out there! :)

Then it would be internal medicine...

Actually it'll probably be less competetive than IM now b/c not only do you have to deal with the above you'll also have to deal with being called a pimple doc...

Then ofcourse pts. in derm dont die as often as IM pts...
 
Would derm be at all competitive if it paid on average $150k, most derms worked 60 hrs/wk with lots of night call, and the residency was a hellish 80 hr/wk constant....all other things the same about the specialty?

Just curious what most folks think here.

As a first-year med student, I'm just still a bit surprised that derm is one of THE most competitive fields. Obviously, the small size of the field is a major factor there. But if I would have had to guess where derm would fall in prior to getting into med school, I definitely wouldn't have placed it so highly in competitiveness.

Do most students get all worked up about derm after starting med school? In residency? Or are there really that many people dying to treat skin disorders? Just curious...no offense meant to any derms out there! :)

How did you not realize this before med school? Were you thinking ob/gyn was the most competitive since you get the thrill of doing high liablility L&D's at 3AM for the rest of your working life when you just want to get some sleep? Competitiveness for residency slots is a function of lifestyle and compensation. Maybe I'm wrong as a guy who has yet to start med school, but I don't want my career as a physician to be the sole defining aspect of my life, no matter what specialty I go into.

Your tone seems to suggest that you think that med students should solely base their decision on their passion. But do any/most/some students even know what their true passion in medicine is going to be? I think its OK to go into derm because you want a good lifestyle and to make decent money at the same time. Do you think every specialty is going to be exciting and all the cases are going to be challenging? No, there's going to be alot of mundane stuff no matter what the specialty. If you truly find skin boring, then derm isn't for you, but I doubt that a greater sense of fulfillment could be found in other IM specialties unless you get kicks out of saving lives (one really good reason not to consider derm).
 
No.

Surprised? Don't be. Follow the $$.

Would derm be at all competitive if it paid on average $150k, most derms worked 60 hrs/wk with lots of night call, and the residency was a hellish 80 hr/wk constant....all other things the same about the specialty?

Just curious what most folks think here.

As a first-year med student, I'm just still a bit surprised that derm is one of THE most competitive fields. Obviously, the small size of the field is a major factor there. But if I would have had to guess where derm would fall in prior to getting into med school, I definitely wouldn't have placed it so highly in competitiveness.

Do most students get all worked up about derm after starting med school? In residency? Or are there really that many people dying to treat skin disorders? Just curious...no offense meant to any derms out there! :)
 
OP, don't let anyone tell you different. The only reason people do derm is that its 40 hours a week for ~$300,000. Its probably the highest grossing per hour field in all of medicine. If it made peds money, no, it would not be the most competitive field in medicine. In fact, it would be slightly more competitive than peds. That's about it.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Of course it would be less competitive but the real question is how much less so? Do I think it would be as easy to get as Peds or IM? No way......it's sheer spots. There are so few derm spots out there b/c how many derms does a hospital really need? Every hospital need IM, most have some pedi program, same w/EM, anesthesia, and most hospitals need GS. The lack of volume of spots would never let it slip into the non competitive catagory but I think it would rank somewhere along the lines of anesthesia. A field where you need to be somewhat competitive but not overly so.
 
I am just starting my first year of med school in about six weeks...

EVEN I KNEW the attraction to derm was a function of time and money. After working long hours in my lab at all hours of the night, I knew I didn't want this for the rest of my life (long hours for low pay, that is). [non-trad here]

I thought about the possibility of choosing a speciality based upon the quality of life I would have. I decided that there is nothing wrong with choosing a specialty for the quality of life it might grant. I have a wife and children, and I do not want to spend my ENTIRE career wishing I could spend more time with them. I am important too, and so is the quality of my life. It isn't only my future patients' lives and their "quality of life" that are important.

If I can work damn hard, compete and become skilled in a specialty that gives me a good quality of life, can one fault me for it? :thumbup: or :thumbdown:
 
Not at all my friend. There's nothing more important in life than family, friends, and good health.
 
Maybe in a perfect world. However, thanks to self-referrals, dermatologists spend an inordinate amount of time managing mundane problems like acne, seborrhea, eczema, etc. that could easily be dealt with by a competent primary care physician.

I strongly disagree with this...my brother has been to several different doctors (meaning several different dermatologists) and they had a lot of trouble controlling his eczema. Only his latest dermatologist has it under control and I think he's chairman of the department somewhere.

Some of those mundane problems can be more serious than you'd think.
 
If I can work damn hard, compete and become skilled in a specialty that gives me a good quality of life, can one fault me for it? :thumbup: or :thumbdown:

Good for you. Making good $ is always nice, but honoring your family is far more important. It's good you have your priorities straight so early on!
 
I strongly disagree with this...my brother has been to several different doctors (meaning several different dermatologists) and they had a lot of trouble controlling his eczema. Only his latest dermatologist has it under control and I think he's chairman of the department somewhere.

Some of those mundane problems can be more serious than you'd think.

What are you disagreeing with, exactly? :confused:

I never said that eczema (or anything else, for that matter) couldn't potentially be difficult to manage. I simply said that dermatologists see a lot of pretty mundane pathology, just like the rest of us.
 
I still to this day do not understand all the hype with derm other than the obvious shorter hours and more money. I think that there are so many more intersting things to learn about the human body, for me skin would be last on the list.
 
I'd sooner shoot myself in the face than be a dermatologist.
 
Would you shoot yourself before you became a pathologist or a surgeon too? Cause many go into dermatology to specialize in dermatopathology or mohs surgery... So you can spend all day diagnosing skin pathology histologically or do nothing but skin cancer surgery, facial flaps, reconstruction etc... Also you dont have to live the life of a surgeon being on call all the time and working 100 hrs/week during residency...

But each to his own.
 
Top