- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Messages
- 2,263
- Reaction score
- 4,144
As part of my search for eMaterials to evaluate my faculty career, I stumbled on this at the AAMC website:
https://services.aamc.org/Publications/showfile.cfm?file=version102.pdf&prd_id=211&prv_id=255&pdf_id=102
From the abstract:
"Results: Most (68%) responding clinical departments reported having openings for junior physician investigators in POR, totaling 2,097 positions. Slightly more than half (52%) of the departments with openings were not able to fill all their positions, and 27 percent of all openings went unfilled. Conclusions: The data provide a quantitative estimate of the shortage of physician investigators in POR during 20022004, underscore the troubling role of attrition and high turnover rates ..."
Thus, there are jobs awaiting, but why the "high turnover rates"? That is the reason for "might be" on my title.
https://services.aamc.org/Publications/showfile.cfm?file=version102.pdf&prd_id=211&prv_id=255&pdf_id=102
From the abstract:
"Results: Most (68%) responding clinical departments reported having openings for junior physician investigators in POR, totaling 2,097 positions. Slightly more than half (52%) of the departments with openings were not able to fill all their positions, and 27 percent of all openings went unfilled. Conclusions: The data provide a quantitative estimate of the shortage of physician investigators in POR during 20022004, underscore the troubling role of attrition and high turnover rates ..."
Thus, there are jobs awaiting, but why the "high turnover rates"? That is the reason for "might be" on my title.