HippocratesX said:
So what does one do, exactly, to get into one of these direct linkage/masters postbacc programs if you don't have a gpa of 3.0 and above? I mean, are they really strict cut-off gpa requirements, or do they make exceptions by taking a look at LORs, EC's, upward gpa trends, etc?? Or does one have to do a second bachelors altogether??? Does anyone have experience or knowledge about schools with less rigid requirements, etc?? Even, if they are not direct-linkage programs....any Masters or structured postbacc programs that will take a serious look at someone with <3.0gpa or at least admit on a probationary period??
If you have under a 3.0, my understanding is that you're all but screwed for a direct linkage program. The problem is that even if you got in, there are SO many students competing for the linkages that you will be left in the dust. However, even at Bryn Mawr, the majority of the students in the elite programs wind up not linking, so not getting a linkage isn't the end of the world.
With an SMP, my understanding is that you have a little more leeway, especially if you have an outstanding trend in GPA. By definition, these places don't get the greatest apps since the greatest apps are already in med school. If you have a great MCAT, so much the better. Some of these are really strict, but it seems that SMPs at DO schools are less stringent in general. Oh, and all schools will give you a boost if you do great in the program and have a great MCAT score.
Unfortunately, most structured and even unstructured programs also have ridiculously stringent GPA requirements. For example, say you just want to take classes a la carte at Penn. If you go to the prospective student meeting, they will come out and tell you that a 3.3 from a CC is better than a 2.8 from an elite private school, because of their 3.0-and-that's-that stance on admissions. Now, what's nice about Penn is that if you have above a 3.0, it's noncompetitive - there aren't a limited number of seats. But many places do have seat limitations and a BS GPA prereq to keep up an illusion of quality. Is it fair? No. But that's the situation, and it must be planned for accordingly.
Fortunately, there are places where those of us can go. The first stop is your local 4-year state school. Mine only required a 2.3 GPA for second degree transfer credit (but a 3.0 for a post-bacc that would take the same amount of time. WHY?!
![Mad :mad: :mad:]()
). The second choice is just taking classes in open enrollment programs. Harvard and Northwestern are two places where this can be achieved (and cheaply, I might add). You just sign up and pay online.
In summary, there are ALWAYS options for people with even the crummiest of GPAs - they just need to be rooted out. It really ticks me off when 75%+ of programs out there give us the shaft solely to boost the rep of their precious little program when what they need more is the money that admitting more students would give them.