Which programs are generally good, which are notoriously bad, which are so-so?
I'll start:
Good
Hopkins
Mayo
Bad
Duke
WashU (?)
So-so
Brigham
I'll start:
Good
Hopkins
Mayo
Bad
Duke
WashU (?)
So-so
Brigham
Lonestar said:Depends on the personality of the surgeon.
powermd said:It varies by department, and often by surgeon at Columbia. Neuro universally gets along well with anesthesia. Ortho is so-so to bad, with one or two surgeons that are great to work with. ENT is about 1/2 good, 1/2 awful, same with GYN. General is a mixed bag. Overall I would give Columbia surgeons a 5/10 for relationships with anesthesiology. One thing that bugs me is the surgical residents. Many are decent human beings, but a good number treat anesthesiology residents with little respect, and it's (obviously) unjustified. You can frequently hear surgeons (residents and attendings) muttering their frustration with us for so-called anesthesia delays that are beyond our control. It's annoying, but it doesn't happen every day, so it's tolerable.
😀UTSouthwestern said:I would then tell them to go apologize to my junior resident, half jokingly, but with enough of an edge to let them know that I was keeping score and would delay a case for my resident to get a 30 minute break if they kept up with the smack.
powermd said:It varies by department, and often by surgeon at Columbia. Neuro universally gets along well with anesthesia. Ortho is so-so to bad, with one or two surgeons that are great to work with. ENT is about 1/2 good, 1/2 awful, same with GYN. General is a mixed bag. Overall I would give Columbia surgeons a 5/10 for relationships with anesthesiology. One thing that bugs me is the surgical residents. Many are decent human beings, but a good number treat anesthesiology residents with little respect, and it's (obviously) unjustified. You can frequently hear surgeons (residents and attendings) muttering their frustration with us for so-called anesthesia delays that are beyond our control. It's annoying, but it doesn't happen every day, so it's tolerable.
In dealing with them, you must realize (not necessarily participate in) that they are highly hierarchy driven folks. And, that they are very alpha-male/-female who are all about establishing a pecking order. Their favorite game is to piss on your shoes & see how you will react - this is true for the preponderance of them from intern all the way up to Dept. Chair. So, to establish yourself credibly & solidly w/i their delusional hierarchy, you must piss back on their shoes - with all the respect & professionalism due their rank, of course.
OldManDave said:All in all, surgeons & surgical-larvae are simple critters.In dealing with them, you must realize (not necessarily participate in) that they are highly hierarchy driven folks. And, that they are very alpha-male/-female who are all about establishing a pecking order. Their favorite game is to piss on your shoes & see how you will react - this is true for the preponderance of them from intern all the way up to Dept. Chair. So, to establish yourself credibly & solidly w/i their delusional hierarchy, you must piss back on their shoes - with all the respect & professionalism due their rank, of course.
Seriously, the silly metaphor above is based in reality. If you allow them to walk on you, they will continue to do so - forever. Medicine is filled with driven, competitive people who consciously or unconsciously will seek to establish their dominion over you. You can either allow this or you can stand your ground - professionally, of course - and not become a doormat.
I am a very laid-back, easy-going anesthesia dude in our ORs. However, I do not & will not back down from a challenge...in fact, in a perverse manner, I sorta enjoy the mental chess involved 😍 . This affords me the luxury of not being constantly challenged...I have firmly established myself. I guess this propensity harkens back to my days as a bouncer - in my wild & wooley days!
![]()
UTSouthwestern said:It's an interesting dilemma that anesthesiology residents face every day: take it or fight it. My opinion is that when you're right, you're right and the patient's interests come first and foremost. That being said, I would sometimes piss on the sand to make sure the surgeons knew that A. I knew what I was doing and talking about and B. I am the gatekeeper of the OR.
What's ironic is that I am now working with some of those ex-residents and they can see that what I said was in fact true: The number of times a delay is truly an anesthesia delay is remarkably small. This was the case on Friday night when I was called in to cover three trauma cases for an ex-resident who couldn't get his normal anesthesia group to cover him and the sucker used the ER anesthesia call list. He immediately recognized me and I him and we started off terse with each other, but rapidly warmed up when he saw his first patient go back within five minutes of my arrival, waited all of seven minutes to have his patient blocked, asleep, and prepped and subsequently had only 5-10 minute turnover time between cases.
We started at 10:30 pm and finished three ortho trauma cases by 2 am and he couldn't stop complimenting me and the nurses for our speed, efficiency, and safety (he marked the wrong shoulder on the second patient).
bigdan said:Okay. So you guys seem to recommend picking your battles, which, with all due respect, is a healthy dose of common sense. And the patient comes first; gotcha on that, too. But when MUST you defend yourself? HOW do you do it? And what does that hierarchy mean when it's a world-famous Dept. of Surgery Chair and you're a CA1?
dc
jetproppilot said:Got a problem surgeon who incessantly rises above the playful banter with alpha-male tactics?
Pull him into the office with you and your partners, tell him you're ready, willing, and able to take care of him and his patients in an optimum fashion, but his antics are over the top , and won't be tolerated. And if he continues said antics, well, you need to take your cases elsewhere, cuz we're ready to not cover your cases. Find your own anesthesiologist. Oh, by the way, we've got an exclusive contract here.
I've done it.
davvid2700 said:You have great ideas jetpropilot but I think the administration will sooner get rid of you then a orthopedic surgeon regardless of your exclusive contract which can become not exclusive come negotiation time. If you say (they need us). they can get any number of (employment agency type groups.. napa et al ) to staff their hospital. These groups have endless cash and they can afford to pay premium dollar to get staff going. Albeit probably not as good as you are but its coverage none the less. This specialty tolerates mediocre clinicians very well.
Anesthesia departments are not scut monkeys and are not a division of surgery as they used to be. A good anesthesia department, large or small, can ATTRACT surgeons to their facility. Surgeons want familiarity - they don't want some rotating-door locums group with a different face every week or month that's not used to working with them.davvid2700 said:You have great ideas jetpropilot but I think the administration will sooner get rid of you then a orthopedic surgeon regardless of your exclusive contract which can become not exclusive come negotiation time. If you say (they need us). they can get any number of (employment agency type groups.. napa et al ) to staff their hospital. These groups have endless cash and they can afford to pay premium dollar to get staff going. Albeit probably not as good as you are but its coverage none the less. This specialty tolerates mediocre clinicians very well.