letter of interest

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sotired

sotired
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Messages
284
Reaction score
1
i have heard that sending an additional letter of interest may help - what are everyone's thoughts on this?
-send it before you hear anything yet, or after you get rejected to ask for a re-evaluation?
-snail mail vs. email?
 
i have heard that sending an additional letter of interest may help - what are everyone's thoughts on this?
-send it before you hear anything yet, or after you get rejected to ask for a re-evaluation?
-snail mail vs. email?

BEFORE you get rejected. After you get rejected, very rarely, if ever, will your file get reconsidered.

They are usually useful for if you're on HOLD or if you're on a WAITLIST.

SNAIL MAIL!!!! SNAIL MAIL!!!!!
 
Now, here's my question. Do you think admissions committees actually read letters of interest or update letters? In my mind, it looks much too easy for one letter to get lost in the bureaucratic shuffle.
 
my take on it is that it can't hurt. they can throw it away, but i've seen a few instances (in my own family) where that letter put them in an interview pool when previously rejected. at the very least you can put your mind at ease knowing you did absolutely everything you could
 
I think it is an extremely important thing to do after an interview, before you hear back (before your file goes to committee). I think they usually do put those kinds of letters in your file.

I also know of it working in the pre-interview stage as well. Especially when they've shelved your application for another look later.
 
I think it is an extremely important thing to do after an interview, before you hear back (before your file goes to committee). I think they usually do put those kinds of letters in your file.

I also know of it working in the pre-interview stage as well. Especially when they've shelved your application for another look later.

Seems like you have some experience with this- what would you mention in these letters? I mean...yes interest, but what would you focus on?
 
Seems like you have some experience with this- what would you mention in these letters? I mean...yes interest, but what would you focus on?

In terms of the pre-interview one -- I just think it can put your folder back on the top of the pile. And sometime schools specifically want to know that you are interested in them, so they'll wait to hear that you are before they extend an invitation. (I'm thinking specifically of Wake, Cornell, and a few others.)

I think this strategy is more effective post-interview, though. I would try to write the letter to a specific person, rather than the admissions office in general. In order to make sure that it gets into your file, it should go to a specific person that is on the admissions committee. In my experience, I have generally met with one or two people at each interview who are on the admissions commitee -- either they interviewed you, or you had a brief discussion with them, or they introduced themselves to the whole group at the beginning of the day.

In the letter, you could remind them about your meeting with them, your discussion or whatever. I usually will restate the things I told them at the time. For example, "as we discussed on __(date)____, I am very impressed with x, y, and z. I believe this medical school is a particularly good fit for me for my education because ____." I always try to include an update in the letter, because I think it's a good segue and it makes the letter seem not quite as overtly for sucking up purposes.

I have done this to the schools I really care about, and every time the person has responded to me and said they appreciate the letter and my interest in the school and they would make sure it would be included in my file. And I just got accepted at one of them!!!!

I don't think it matters if you do mail or email. If you send an email, they will be more likely to respond, although I did send one via mail, and the guy actually took the time to look up my email address and respond to me. I was pretty impressed by that.

I would do this in addition to the thank you letters. Try to space it so enough time has passed after the interview that you have something additional to say -- if not an update, at least you can say, basically, "after all this time has passed and I have had the opportunity to see other medical programs, I still remain strongly interested in your program." But you do want to make sure this is done in time for it to get into your file before your file goes to committee. You need to be fresh in their minds when they begin to discuss you at the meeting. I truly think this helps.
 
This is why cubbbie is my hero. No posturing, just genuine help. Thanks! I have been wondering when to send the letter and your advice helped a lot.
 
This is why cubbbie is my hero. No posturing, just genuine help. Thanks! I have been wondering when to send the letter and your advice helped a lot.

No problem. Bear in mind I'm just a humble applicant like the rest of you. But now that I've been accepted at a (out of my league) top choice, I feel I can speak with a little more authority.🙂
 
No problem. Bear in mind I'm just a humble applicant like the rest of you. But now that I've been accepted at a (out of my league) top choice, I feel I can speak with a little more authority.🙂

Thanks a bunch- your advice gave me some bearing on the letter of intent deal. Didn't even know those were necessary- but then again, I haven't had a reason to do these considering I haven't gotten any invites yet😛

But definitely will keep that in mind. Appreciate it.
 
how successful are these? i know it can't hurt, but does anyone know how effective they are?
 
are you supposed to send a letter of interest to all schools? (once you've interviewed?)

i was under the impression that you should only send a letter of interest to your top choice?
 
are you supposed to send a letter of interest to all schools? (once you've interviewed?)

i was under the impression that you should only send a letter of interest to your top choice?


I'm not talking about letter of intent. In my opinion, those are for the post-interview waitlist stage. I wouldn't use them in any other way, because they seem a little desperate and are probably a turn off when they're actively considering you.

I only wrote letters of interest to a few schools. I think it is a little disingenuous to send a letter of interest if you aren't actually interested. It would just seem really generic to whoever is reading it.

Effectiveness of these letters vary by school. Some schools probably do disregard them, but I think most value them to some extent. And for borderline people like me, it's a definite plus. It's a way to be official about how you feel about the school. You can't rely on your interviewer to communicate this for you in their write-up about you.

Of course, I've never actually sat in on an admissions committee meeting, but I work very closely with doctors who do. Right now my workplace is in the process of ranking their prospective residents, and I listen to the conversations between the doctors, and the applicant's interest and enthusiasm for the program always enters into the discussion.
 
are you supposed to send a letter of interest to all schools? (once you've interviewed?)

i was under the impression that you should only send a letter of interest to your top choice?

A letter of interest is a non-binding, polite way of, well, stating your interest. You can theoretically send them to every school on your list, and some people will. They can be sent at any point in the cycle, but their value is debatable.

A letter of intent is considered to be binding and is meant to be sent to only one school. Sometimes people break both those rules, which is then discussed endlessly on the forums. They're sent post-interview.
 
if you are sending a letter of interest pre-interview, who do you suggest addressing it to? the dean of admissions? also, is there a way to find out who's on the admissions committee if you haven't interviewed yet...
 
In terms of the pre-interview one -- I just think it can put your folder back on the top of the pile. And sometime schools specifically want to know that you are interested in them, so they'll wait to hear that you are before they extend an invitation. (I'm thinking specifically of Wake, Cornell, and a few others.)

I think this strategy is more effective post-interview, though. I would try to write the letter to a specific person, rather than the admissions office in general. In order to make sure that it gets into your file, it should go to a specific person that is on the admissions committee. In my experience, I have generally met with one or two people at each interview who are on the admissions commitee -- either they interviewed you, or you had a brief discussion with them, or they introduced themselves to the whole group at the beginning of the day.

In the letter, you could remind them about your meeting with them, your discussion or whatever. I usually will restate the things I told them at the time. For example, "as we discussed on __(date)____, I am very impressed with x, y, and z. I believe this medical school is a particularly good fit for me for my education because ____." I always try to include an update in the letter, because I think it's a good segue and it makes the letter seem not quite as overtly for sucking up purposes.

I have done this to the schools I really care about, and every time the person has responded to me and said they appreciate the letter and my interest in the school and they would make sure it would be included in my file. And I just got accepted at one of them!!!!

I don't think it matters if you do mail or email. If you send an email, they will be more likely to respond, although I did send one via mail, and the guy actually took the time to look up my email address and respond to me. I was pretty impressed by that.

I would do this in addition to the thank you letters. Try to space it so enough time has passed after the interview that you have something additional to say -- if not an update, at least you can say, basically, "after all this time has passed and I have had the opportunity to see other medical programs, I still remain strongly interested in your program." But you do want to make sure this is done in time for it to get into your file before your file goes to committee. You need to be fresh in their minds when they begin to discuss you at the meeting. I truly think this helps.

I haven't heard back from Cornell yet, but I am wondering if it necessary to contact them? Thanks.
 
I haven't heard back from Cornell yet, but I am wondering if it necessary to contact them? Thanks.

I don't know. My boyfriend and I both contacted them and subsequently were offered interviews. I can't say for sure that it was because we contacted them, but I think it probably was, because neither of us is a stellar candidate. Anecdotally, it seems like people who contact Cornell generally do get an interview invite in response. In my case, I had been complete for quite a while, and I'm sure my file had already been passed over multiple times.

Then again, even though we were invited, we remain sub-stellar candidates, so it still doesn't mean much. It's a first step though.

EDIT: I want to add that we contacted them and were offered interviews within a few days ... further evidence. Me after being complete for months, him after being complete only for 4 or 5 weeks.
 
if you are sending a letter of interest pre-interview, who do you suggest addressing it to? the dean of admissions? also, is there a way to find out who's on the admissions committee if you haven't interviewed yet...

Mmm, I think pre-interview it might be viewed as kind of obnoxious to try to go straight to the top. I mean, if you have some particular reason for contacting someone specific on the admissions committee, I guess it could be ok. I sent all my pre-interview ones to the general admissions office addresses, though -- either email or regular mail, depending. I think it's more appropriate, and the people who work in those offices actually often do have a great deal of power in the process -- at least in terms of whose file gets where, how quickly it gets there, and in what fashion.
 
Top