Ranking of DAT/Other Selection Criteria by US DS

DATBooster | The Ultimate DAT Resource
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
doc toothache

doc toothache

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
8,514
Reaction score
2,792
A hotly debated issue has been the assignment of relative importance of DAT sections as criteria for selection of candidates by US ds. With the recently published information by the ADA we now have definitive information on how ds rank the various selection criteria including DAT, gpa, interviews, lor. The information does support the original feeling by many that the QR section was the least important. What was not expected is to see a higher response to the importance of RC vis-a-vis bio, gc, and oc especially with the more recent introduction of TS scores.The information used was obtained from the ADA at http://www.ada.org/ada/prod/survey/survey_ed_vol2.pdf
Members don't see this ad.
 

Attachments

  • Copy of Ranking_of_DAT_scores_sdn 10-28-9.xls
    27 KB · Views: 15,023
Last edited:
Sort by date Sort by votes
thanks doc


i wonder why UCSF has N/A for all its categories in ranking importance of sections
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Members don't see this ad :)
Great information. I can stop dwelling on my QR score now.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
i wonder why MWU(Midwestern) has no stats in anything... are they brand new?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
doc3232 said:
That's not completely true. Some schools don't care for individual sciences ONLY because there is the TS score to sum the science portions ups.
Click to expand...

That's like suggesting that no individual scores including TS are of importance since they are included in the AA.

Randy822 said:
nothing on UoP?
Click to expand...

The info for your favorite ds has been added.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Did anyone look at Iowa's view of importance in the DAT sections.... AA, PAT, and TS are 3s. While QR is a 1. Complete opposite of the other schools.... wonder how they came up with these rankings?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Members don't see this ad :)
doc toothache said:
That's like suggesting that no individual scores including TS are of importance since they are included in the AA.
Click to expand...

Except that TS is not an individual score and AA doesnt tell the schools how the students did in the sciences (or in any other section for that matter).
What doc3232 is saying is that the schools rank TS highly because it averages out the three sciences so the 3 individual science scores dont necessarily have to be analyzed (just to make sure there are no extremes). RC is an individual score so schools must look at this number.
Say if QR, RC, and PAT were average in a Nonscience score then I think that the QR, RC, and PAT individual scores would also drop in the importance (just as we see with the OC, GC, and BIO with the TS).
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
yuppers said:
Except that TS is not an individual score and AA doesnt tell the schools how the students did in the sciences (or in any other section for that matter).
What doc3232 is saying is that the schools rank TS highly because it averages out the three sciences so the 3 individual science scores dont necessarily have to be analyzed (just to make sure there are no extremes). RC is an individual score so schools must look at this number.
Say if QR, RC, and PAT were average in a Nonscience score then I think that the QR, RC, and PAT individual scores would also drop in the importance (just as we see with the OC, GC, and BIO with the TS).
Click to expand...

Making "sure there are no extremes" without "analyzing" the scores presents quite a challenge.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
doc toothache said:
Making "sure there are no extremes" without "analyzing" the scores presents quite a challenge.
Click to expand...

You can "make sure there are no extremes" by simply glancing at the scores. What I was saying is that schools can glance at the scores to make sure there is not a 14 being offset by a 30 to get a average/good score. To do that doesn't require analyzing (which I define as more than a glance or check).
Are you just going to pick off partial quotes to attempt to refute my point or just altogether avoid the point I was trying to make.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
yuppers said:
You can "make sure there are no extremes" by simply glancing at the scores. What I was saying is that schools can glance at the scores to make sure there is not a 14 being offset by a 30 to get a average/good score. To do that doesn't require analyzing (which I define as more than a glance or check).
Are you just going to pick off partial quotes to attempt to refute my point or just altogether avoid the point I was trying to make.
Click to expand...

Since you seem to know what "school do and don't" like glance vs analyze you are more than welcome to keep your "point".
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Doc Toothache, Did they (ADA?) ask the individual schools to rank them or did they assume based on accepted applicants?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
failedmagician said:
Doc Toothache, Did they (ADA?) ask the individual schools to rank them or did they assume based on accepted applicants? It's okay if you don't have this detail, I'm just curious. I'm so thankful to see that the only section on Florida that is "somewhat unimportant" is PAT. It's my lowest score. :)
Click to expand...

You will find your answer in the Introduction of the source quoted, which would be the 4th line of the post.

yuppers said:
Did anyone look at Iowa's view of importance in the DAT sections.... AA, PAT, and TS are 3s. While QR is a 1. Complete opposite of the other schools.... wonder how they came up with these rankings?
Click to expand...

You might like the changes better.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
If you look at Doc Toothaches data gathered from ADA, you will find that for US Dental Schools the average order of importance on the DAT is:

AA (1.17) > TS (1.20) > RC (1.35) > BIO (1.39) > OC (1.46) > GC (1.5) > PAT (1.65) > QR (2.26)

In addition, if factor in the "other factors" you will find that in general US Dental Schools value the following in this order:

Interview (1.07) > SCI GPA (1.09) > AA (1.17) > Overall GPA (1.19) > TS (1.20) > RC (1.35) > BIO (1.39) > OC (1.46) > GC (1.5) > LOR (1.63) > PAT (1.65) > Man Dext (1.90) > Non Sci GPA (2.02) > QR (2.26)

I wish PAT was ranked higher, I eat those for breakfast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0 Downvote
Can someone please give me advice on the following:

I just took my DAT at got 19AA/19TS/16 PAT:eek:

I know that my AA and TS are average, but the 16 is really low. Because of the 90 day policy to retake, I wouldn't be able to retake the exam until November 8, which cuts it close to a lot of deadlines, and makes my application really late since most schools start replying back by October.

What do I do??
Should I submit my apps with this score and just hope that I hear back from a couple, or do I retake the exam regardless of dates and then submit (which puts me at risk of not getting in because of it being late).

Thanks and hope to hear from someone soon!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
nc0127 said:
Can someone please give me advice on the following:

I just took my DAT at got 19AA/19TS/16 PAT:eek:

I know that my AA and TS are average, but the 16 is really low. Because of the 90 day policy to retake, I wouldn't be able to retake the exam until November 8, which cuts it close to a lot of deadlines, and makes my application really late since most schools start replying back by October.

What do I do??
Should I submit my apps with this score and just hope that I hear back from a couple, or do I retake the exam regardless of dates and then submit (which puts me at risk of not getting in because of it being late).

Thanks and hope to hear from someone soon!
Click to expand...

Yo bro, you shouldn't be hijacking this thread. Next thing you know this will become a "what are my chances?" thread.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
LetsGo2DSchool said:
Yo bro, you shouldn't be hijacking this thread. Next thing you know this will become a "what are my chances?" thread.
Click to expand...


The thread is about sections of the exam and how important each section is depending on the schools. My post is regarding the PAT section and whether or not it is weighed so heavily where a 16 is unacceptable.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

DAT Destroyer
FREE DAT Tutorial offered by the Prometric Testing Center
Replies
1
Views
1K
DAT Destroyer
DAT Destroyer
P
  • Question
Help on PAT angle ranking!
Replies
0
Views
432
Pre Dental Rev
P
T
  • Question
I just registered for my first DAT test and selected schools. Now I realize that I should’ve taken the test first then selected schools. Take test?
Replies
2
Views
923
Chicago_predental
C
Elder_Citrus
  • Question
Practical DAT Test Day Experience & Breakdown (23AA/22PAT/23TS) by a First-time (& Last-time) Taker
Replies
6
Views
2K
deleted967057
D
R
  • Question
DAT PAT Angle Ranking Obtuse Angles
Replies
4
Views
1K
DAT Destroyer
DAT Destroyer
Top