Ek 1001 pully 466/471 I made pictures!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

GRod18

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
Points
0
pully.jpg

** the empty box on 471 is also 1 Kg.



466. What minimum force F is required to lift the mass?
Answer: 30 N

EK says to ignore the angle 30 degrees for this problem because tension is same everywhere, but that doesn't seem to be very intuitive, why am I not just using the straight vertical force?

471. What is the tension T in the rope.
 Answer: 6 N

EK says that mass 1 (empty box, left one) will accelerates at twice the rate of mass 2, is it because that mass 2 has two Tension forces holding it up?

Thanks all.
 
pully.jpg

** the empty box on 471 is also 1 Kg.



466. What minimum force F is required to lift the mass?
Answer: 30 N

EK says to ignore the angle 30 degrees for this problem because tension is same everywhere, but that doesn't seem to be very intuitive, why am I not just using the straight vertical force?

471. What is the tension T in the rope.
 Answer: 6 N

EK says that mass 1 (empty box, left one) will accelerates at twice the rate of mass 2, is it because that mass 2 has two Tension forces holding it up?

Thanks all.

for Question 466: you are using the vertical force which is why you can ignore the angle! the weight is 6 x 10 = 60, and since the down force involves 2T and the upward pull (you pulling on the rope) is T, you get 60/2 = 30N. You have to pull twice as long but with 1/2 the amount of force.

477: yes, it is due to the 2T compared to T, (exact same senario at question 466.
 
Can someone explain how T=6N in 471 ? Thanks!

If the big pulley is fixed in space and the pulleys and rope are massless, the total force down on the big pulley (as transmitted through the rope) is 2kg x g = 20N.

Assuming the pulleys are also frictionless (in addition to being massless), the tension will be a constant throughout the rope. The rope pulls down on the big pulley at three places, so the tension in the rope is 20N/3 = 6.66N.

Anything else, and the big pulley would fly away or go crashing into the ground.
 

Members do not see ads. Register today.

Awesome, thanks! I was making it wayyyyyy to complicated than it need be!
 
If the big pulley is fixed in space and the pulleys and rope are massless, the total force down on the big pulley (as transmitted through the rope) is 2kg x g = 20N.

Assuming the pulleys are also frictionless (in addition to being massless), the tension will be a constant throughout the rope. The rope pulls down on the big pulley at three places, so the tension in the rope is 20N/3 = 6.66N.

Anything else, and the big pulley would fly away or go crashing into the ground.
this is incredibly amazing explanation and i hope it is the correct way to deal with this problem. can anyone else verify this as the answer is 6 not 6.666?
 
this is incredibly amazing explanation and i hope it is the correct way to deal with this problem. can anyone else verify this as the answer is 6 not 6.666?

6.666 would be true if it is in equilibrium. But since the OP said the blank box is also 1kg, or 10N in force, and based on answer in 466, you only need 5N to lift the box, which means there's also an acceleration upward with the small pulley. I know theres some annoying calculation required to chug out the answer for tension, so I won't do it, but it explains the discrepancy.
 
Top Bottom