The CV that students see in ERAS is HTML driven and as such, we can use HTML characters during input that affect how the CV looks.
I understand that although we can do this for the Personal Statement, Program Directors see it in plaintext, so all the HTML coding would show.
Is this also true for the CV portion?
I ask because I've chosen to use resume-style formatting to keep the CV short and concise. For example, for something like Student Body President:
* Represented class on issues related to....
* Invited to ....
Without HTML, there is no break, and all bulleted or hyphenated lists run as one long blurb of paragraph.
Any recommendations? I could just write each Experience entry in full sentences and paragraph format, but I know from sitting on the other side of the table that these are painful to read through like that.
I tried using HTML, but the commands have not worked. I have used hard returns (just hit "Enter" in the text field) to alter the CAF view (the breaks do not show up in the CV view).
Also, I've used caps to define different subsections. For example, one of my research experiences also had a significant clinical portion. I would do the following (in CAF-view):
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: Looked at the correlation of the thing to the whozit.
CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: Examined patients with the thing.
OUTCOMES: This resulted in 2 posters and 1 paper
In CV view (i.e., block o' text):
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: Looked at the correlation of the thing to the whozit. CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: Examined patients with the thing. OUTCOMES: This resulted in 2 posters and 1 paper
In either view, the capps hook the eye and signal the reader what information I'm giving them. Also, I like to add the "OUTCOMES" heading because it tells the reader exactly how productive I was during that experience and links directly to my pubs. It's just another way of being very honest and not "upselling," as another poster puts it.
I used a trick I saw on here earlier about the Author field. Instead of naming people directly:
Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
I did this:
1) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
Why? Because the CAF orders posters and pubs alphabetically according to the last name of the first author. This is completely at-odds with how people expect pubs to be listed - chronologically, with most recent at the top.
Say you're Smith. This is how you CAF usually works:
Jingleheimer JJ, Smith J, Jones D, 2011
Jones D, Smith J, Jingleheimer JJ, 2009
Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ, 2010
Which is makes no sense. However, inserting the number does this:
1) Jingleheimer JJ, Smith J, Jones D, 2011
2) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ, 2010
3) Jones D, Smith J, Jingleheimer JJ, 2009
By manipulating the number, you can re-order the pubs to be in chronological order, which is much easier to read. Note: If you have more than ten entries, you need to add a zero before the number:
1) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
10) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
2) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
...
becomes:
01) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
02) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
...
10) Smith J, Jones D, Jingleheimer JJ
With more than ten entries, "10)" will follow "1)", instead of "2)". Overall, adding the number is pretty unobtrusive, especially compared to the non-chronological default ordering.