- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey all,
I am a third year currently plodding through my clinical clerkships who finally realized, after the first two years and studying for Step 1, that pathology is what really makes me tick. I have had very little exposure to pathology outside of the classroom and have been trying to get as much as I can in the wards, although I am finding that the opportunities to spend time with pathologists are few and far between with the limited "free" time I am granted outside my ward duties. Although I will have several months as a MS4 to take 1 month electives in pathology, or whatever else, I am concerned whether that short time will be enough to help me make a decision on whether or not I want to apply to pathology residency. In light of this I have been considering doing the PSF after my third year. It seems to me that a year of experience working in pathology would be sufficient to not only help me decide on whether or not I want to be a pathologist, but to solidify my understanding of pathophysiology, anatomy, histology, etc. Yet on the other hand, if I did the PSF, I would have to graduate a year later. The age thing doesn't bother me me as much, I'm still young, but I'm not sure I really want to be in med school for 5 years. So my dilemma is as follows and hopefully some of you can provide your opinion on the subject: is it worthwhile to take the extra year and do a PSF, or should I just follow my current course, take path electives, graduate, and start my path residency (assuming that I chose path)? There are no real issues when it comes to grades and scores, I've done well and consider those a positive towards my residency application. What are your thoughts on this? Thanks. 🙂
I am a third year currently plodding through my clinical clerkships who finally realized, after the first two years and studying for Step 1, that pathology is what really makes me tick. I have had very little exposure to pathology outside of the classroom and have been trying to get as much as I can in the wards, although I am finding that the opportunities to spend time with pathologists are few and far between with the limited "free" time I am granted outside my ward duties. Although I will have several months as a MS4 to take 1 month electives in pathology, or whatever else, I am concerned whether that short time will be enough to help me make a decision on whether or not I want to apply to pathology residency. In light of this I have been considering doing the PSF after my third year. It seems to me that a year of experience working in pathology would be sufficient to not only help me decide on whether or not I want to be a pathologist, but to solidify my understanding of pathophysiology, anatomy, histology, etc. Yet on the other hand, if I did the PSF, I would have to graduate a year later. The age thing doesn't bother me me as much, I'm still young, but I'm not sure I really want to be in med school for 5 years. So my dilemma is as follows and hopefully some of you can provide your opinion on the subject: is it worthwhile to take the extra year and do a PSF, or should I just follow my current course, take path electives, graduate, and start my path residency (assuming that I chose path)? There are no real issues when it comes to grades and scores, I've done well and consider those a positive towards my residency application. What are your thoughts on this? Thanks. 🙂