shoud I do a Pain fellowship or Spine fellowship?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

rehabdoc

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2002
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I would like to start this thread since many of PM&R resident are interested in pain management and or spine care. Obviously there is a huge market for this branch if physiatry these days. Almost 50 percent of the jobs offered in the red or blue journal are combination of interventional pain/spine-EMG and musculoskeletal medicine.

So should I choose a pain fellowship or a spine fellowship? The answer is quite easy it depends on the area of interest, these two sub-specialties have some common procedures but besides that they are quite different.

As pain specialist you not only will manage spine related painful syndromes but also will deal with other pathological issues with pain and their symptoms. You have to have the knowledge of medical and interventional pain control. You have to combine your rehab skills and integrate the interventional and non-interventional skills to manage pain. Your referral sources are spine specialists, which have completed diagnostics and therapeutic interventions without significant help and are looking into more sophisticated pain management like spinal cord stimulator or implantble Intrathecal pumps or pure medical pain control. PCP's , other rehab docs and orthopedic groups are your other major referral source. Your work would be hospital or clinic based and interventions are done in clinic or in the surgical-center or OR. All implantble devices are done in the OR. You could generally train in a pain fellowship which is ACGME accredited which makes you eligible to sit for pain boards. There are many pain fellowship around the country both ACGME and non-ACGME. Some are rehab based which seems to be more interdisciplinary and provide broad base pain training. Physiatrist, psychiatrist and Anesthesiologist compete for the pain fellowships in the country and the competition for the good fellowships are quite tough. Financially you will do quite well and the amount is based on your skills, aggressiveness in interventional aspect, practice style and set up, location, insurances and private vs. academics. Range of income is from 130K academic in metropolitan with incentives to 500k in private practice and up.

A spine specialist to most part will only concentrate on pathological spine issues in more depth. Their knowledge of spine is vast and they are skillful in diagnosing different spine diseases. They complement this part of their practice with performing EMG. Their referral sources are other PMR or Ortho docs to most part. They do market themselves as interventionalist and to most part refer chronic pain situations to pain specialists. There is generally a good working relationship between spine and pain specialist since more sophisticated spine procedures are often done by spine docs like Vertebroplasty and Nucleoplasty. Many pain specialists now perform similar procedures as well to expand the clinical skills. The spine specialists generally work in spine centers and or in private groups with neurosurgeons or orthopedic practices. Interventions are done at spine center or OR. Some procedures like Vertebroplasty is generally done in OR setting. There is no ACGME for spine fellowships yet. Some are PASSOR certified which are the better programs. There are many good and some excellent spine fellowships around the country almost all rehab-based programs. Competition for the best programs are generally tight but since you are only competing within the PM&R specialty, there is a chance that if you are a good resident, you will be able to secure a position. Financially you will also do excellent. Range is similar to pain. If you choose to perform EMG then your income obviously will increase in both specialties.


As an interventional pain fellow interested in many aspects of pain, I love what I do but you should know it is not that easy. Population of patient with chronic / acute pain is a very though population. There are many layers to their problems many of which are psychosocial and difficult to manage. Certainly the burnout rate in pain management is high for this reason and many pain clinicians tend to do it part time. You should be comfortable taking care of difficult patients, have a solid knowledge of anatomy, have a good training in pain and spine procedures and be efficient to become an overall well rounded and successful pain doc. You can't claim to be a pain specialist and only do injections and not manage patients medically. So many physiatrists tend to choose spine fellowships to avoid the chronic pain population, which in theory is good idea but there are may limitations to how far you could be helpful with the injections and eventually many of the patients will end up moths later in pain centers.

There are many good programs around the country and recommending one over the other is sometimes tough. My only advise is to look into the structure and look at how broad base is the program. Programs, which only do injection type interventions, are missing a big chunk of other pain management techniques and the strictly medical management programs are obviously missing procedures skills. Cancer pain exposure, Inpatient pain exposure, Acute pain exposure, chronic pain exposure, headache management, musculoskeletal medicine and interventional pain management including pumps and stims all should be incorporated in a well balanced curriculum which is compatible with ACGME requirement.

Same is valid for a good spine program. Look at all the aspects of the program including EMG skills, interventions, medical management, Disc and Bone interventions and so forth. Look for PASSOR approval as well.

Personally I advise you to do an elective in a pain clinic as well as a spine center to get a feeling what it is all about. They are both excellent career choices. Both are major help to patients and are on cutting edge of medical science with more sophisticated procedures they can offer.

Here are some useful links and fellowship info for interested residents. discussion.:clap:

AAPM: http://www.painmed.org/about/
ABP : http://www.abpm.org/
North america spine society: http://www.spine.org/spinal_injections.cfm
ISIS: http://www.spinalinjection.com/ISIS/



Pain Management Fellowship under rehab department


[3410531003] VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Program
Greater Los Angeles Veteran Affairs Health Care System
11301 Wilshire Boulevard (w117)
Los Angeles, CA 90073
Pain Management (PM) Quynh Pham, MD (310)268-4935
[email protected]


[3411222008] Emory University Program/Georgia Pain Physicians

2550 Windy Hill Road, Suite 215
Marietta, GA 30067
Pain Management (PM) Robert E. Windsor, MD (770)850-8464
(770)850-9727


[3412312007] Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Program
York Center for Pain Management and Rehabilitation
2901 Pleasant Valley Road
York, PA 17402
Pain Management (PM) Michael B. Furman, MD, MS (717)848-4800
(717)755-9618
[email protected]


[3412412004] Harvard Medical School/Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Program
Harvard Medical School/Spaulding Rehabilitation
125 Nashua Street
Boston, MA 02114
Pain Management (PM)
Alec L. Meleger, MD (617)573-2178
(617)573-2769

[3412521006] University of Michigan Program
University of Michigan
1500 E. University Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Pain Management (PM) J. Steven Schultz, MD (734)937-7210
(734)936-7048

[3414813005] Baylor University Medical Center (Oklahoma City) Program
St. Anthony North Ambulatory Surgery Center
6205 North Santa Fe Avenue, Suite 200
Oklahoma City, OK 73118
Pain Management (PM) Michael J. Carl, MD (405)427-6776
(405)419-5646


For the list of spine fellowships please visit this web page. the list is long and wont fit in my posting . There are some good ones in there including Dr's fortin, windsor, furman, falco and slipman fellwships.

http://www.aapmr.org/member/felsearch.htm

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I think that this is excellent sticky material. Rehabdoc, could you expand and/or edit your post with some links to spine fellowships and other pain related sites--AAPM, ABA-pain section, etc. Then, I'll clean up the thread and make it a sticky.
 
does anyone know of any relevant articles or landmark studies on the efficacy of spine injections (pain and more invasive techniques). i hear people say that "the data is weak" and i just nod my head and say “mmm... interesting”. i don't have an opinion on this topic, but would like to know more.
as an MS IV i've concentrated on learning SCI, MSK, Peds and some TBI for my electives... and getting an overall sense of the field. can someone provide me with some links or sites with outcomes…
thanks.
 
1. Vad V. et al. Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy. Spine 2002;27:11-16.
2. Lutz GE et al. Fluoroscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Epidural Steroids: An Outcome Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79:1362-1366.
3. Manchikanti L et al. Comparison of Three Routes of Epidural Steroid Injections in Low Back Pain. Pain Digest 1999; 9:277-285.
4. Butterman GR. Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Epidural Steroid Injection Compared with Discectomy. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Volume 86-A (4), April 2004, pp 670-679.
5. Riew et al. Can nerve root injections obviate the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain? A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Journal Bone Joint Surgery 2000; 82A(11):1589-1593.
6. Botwin K. P. et al. Fluoroscopic Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural injections: A Prospective Evaluation of Epidurography Contrast Patterns and Anatomical Review of the Epidural Space. Pain Physician 2003, 7 (1):
77-80.
7. White AH et al. Epidural injections for the treatment of low back pain. Spine 1980;5:78-86.
 
I just wanted to inquire about which journals were particularly useful to keep an eye on if one was interested in pain/spine...
 
A few good journals are:

1. Spine by NASS. You get a free subscription it you join and it's only $50 as a resident.
2. Pain Physician. One of the best features of this journal is that all issues are online.
3. The Spine Journal.
 
Stinky Tofu said:
A few good journals are:

1. Spine by NASS. You get a free subscription it you join and it's only $50 as a resident.
2. Pain Physician. One of the best features of this journal is that all issues are online.
3. The Spine Journal.

Although confusing, here is the scoop - Spine USED to be the official journal of NASS. It is no longer. It is, however, the most pretigious peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on issues realted to spine care.

It remains affiliated with the following organizations: Argentine Society for the Study of Spine Pathology · Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association - Spinal Section · Cervical Spine Research Society · Chinese Orthopaedic Association · Finnish Spine Research Society · International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine · Japan Spine Research Society · Korean Society of Spine Surgery · Scoliosis Research Society · Spine Section of the Hellenic Orthopaedic Association · Spine Society of Australia · Spine Society of Europe (Affiliate)

The above refereced Spine Journal is the offocial journal of the North American Spine Society, which also publishes SpineLine, the clinical and news magazine for spine care professionals.

Pain Physician is the Official Journal of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP), an organization whose primary mission is advocating politically on behalf off its membership regarding reimbursement issues. The Journal was previously edited by Dr. Slipman, who stepped down at the end of last year. Articles published in this journal are not peer reviewed.

Last but not least is Pain Medicine, the official Journal of the Amreican Academy of Pain Medicine. The spine section of this journal is edited by Nikolai Bogduk, and membership to the International Spine Intervention Society (ISIS). Membership in either organization entitles you to this journal (I think, it may entitle you only to a significant discount)
 
paz5559 said:
Pain Physician is the Official Journal of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP), an organization whose primary mission is advocating politically on behalf off its membership regarding reimbursement issues. The Journal was previously edited by Dr. Slipman, who stepped down at the end of last year. Articles published in this journal are not peer reviewed.

PainPhysicianJournal.com said:
Pain Physician is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in pain medicine.

According to their website, it is a peer-reviewed journal.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Stinky Tofu said:
According to their website, it is a peer-reviewed journal.

Which only goes to show you shouldn't believe everything you read.

According to two fellowship directors and two founding members ISIS, Pain Physician is not, in fact, peer-reviewed. According to the former editor-in-chief, that is one of the reasons he chose to step down from his position.
 
paz5559 said:
Which only goes to show you shouldn't believe everything you read.

According to two fellowship directors and two founding members ISIS, Pain Physician is not, in fact, peer-reviewed. According to the former editor-in-chief, that is one of the reasons he chose to step down from his position.

Thanks for the tip. :rolleyes: Anyway, Mark Boswell, M.D., Ph.D. is the new editor-in-chief and he is also the chief at CWRU. I'm not sure what his motivation would be to promote a journal as peer-reviewed if it is not. Maybe the former editor-in-chief and two ISIS founders are right and they are lying on their website. Perhaps previously, the journal was not peer-reviewed with the former editor-in-chief in charge and now it is. I guess one can never really know for sure. Irregardless of the peer-reviewed status, in my opinion, there are good articles in the journal and it is available for free online. I know lots of Pain Physicians who read the journal and many of the authors are well-respected in the field.
 
Does anyone know what are the ACGME requirements for a pain fellowship seeking ACGME accreditation? I looked on the ACGME site but was unsuccessful. Also, does anybody have any idea if Goodman's program in Alabama will be accredited?
 
mupmr said:
Does anyone know what are the ACGME requirements for a pain fellowship seeking ACGME accreditation? I looked on the ACGME site but was unsuccessful. Also, does anybody have any idea if Goodman's program in Alabama will be accredited?

I spoke with Dr. Goodman at length about this very topic. first, let me say his fellowship is terrific, and one that generally slips below the radar, but is clearly worth a look. (only downside is that you do have some minimal inpatient responsibilities).

He is attempting to become ACGME accredited, although he is not at present. Now for the odd part - in order to become ACGME accredited, you need to affiliated with an accademic instututon. Rather than UAB, Dr. Goodman is attempting to become affiliated with the University of Missouri's PM&R program (where a number of his fellows have come from in the recent past). He tends to give preference to residents from that program at the moment, and will tell you he does this in order to become ACGME accredited.
 
DigableCat said:
Ultimately, the programs themselves know what they need to do and it involves ALOT of paperwork. And many are just not interested, but they may be soon when they see their applicant quality and numbers fall off as more residents will only consider ACGME accredited programs.

Any resident who does not consider Slipman, Aprill, Prather, CINN, HSS, RIC, BI, Falco, FSI, Cole, Pauza, Stanford, Michigan's Spine fellowship, etc, solely because they are not ACGME accredited, is missing out on some of the best training in the country, IMHO.

Your focus should be on getting the best training first, second, and third. The sky is falling pronouncements made by those on the ABPM&R are just not borne out by the facts at present. Will you need Pain boards? Who knows? Will you get better training in Oklahoma City (an ACGME accredited PM&R progam) than any of the aforementioned places? What do YOU think?
 
paz5559 said:
Any resident who does not consider Slipman, Aprill, Prather, CINN, HSS, RIC, BI, Falco, FSI, Cole, Pauza, Stanford, Michigan's Spine fellowship, etc, solely because they are not ACGME accredited, is missing out on some of the best training in the country, IMHO.

No, I agree wholeheartedly. Just because someone put out the time/effort to fill out the paperwork needed to be ACGME accredited, does not make them any better than the others. BUT with being ACGME accredited, in my opinion, there has to be certain quality of standards that has to be met. Otherwise they lose their accreditation. There is a higher power to answer to than themselves. And ultimately, I think this is theoretically in place for the benefit of the fellow and the protection of our patient population at large. Regardless of whether Slipman, Pauza, or Gotlin would like to acknowledge it, as more pain physicians are being churned out...in order to remain competitive(and especially against ANES pain physicians) we should try to ensure a certain standard of care and pursue ACGME accreditation. What are the drawbacks to having it? Why don't they want it?

And if it's purely for the reason of paperwork(as most of the programs you have listed above already have academic affiliation), then that shows a lack of motivation for reasons unknown to us. And before we decide any fellowship program, we should ask why?


BTW, there is a certain ACGME accredited PM&R fellowship that some friends of mine applied to that they were certainly NOT impressed with at all. And I'm surprised this program even has accreditation, given the fellows training at this program. And another ACGME accrediated PM&R program to me that has suspect ACADEMIC affiliation, as the hospital program that they claim to be affiliated with doesn't appear to have any residents rotate with them(I mean...kinda hard considering they are in different states). Probably affiliated purely for the purpose of acquiring ACGME accreditation.

Ultimately, you have to do what's best for you. Some of us have decided that regardless of whether it's ACGME or not, we have to CYA(cover your a**). The last thing a hospital will be able to use to deny me privileges to use their C-arm or the last thing an attorney will be able to use against me in a malpractice case is that I didn't complete a ACGME(read: Competent Standard of Care) fellowship. Shame it has come to that. Really.
 
paz5559 said:
Any resident who does not consider Slipman, Aprill, Prather, CINN, HSS, RIC, BI, Falco, FSI, Cole, Pauza, Stanford, Michigan's Spine fellowship, etc, solely because they are not ACGME accredited, is missing out on some of the best training in the country, IMHO.


Though I agreed they are all good or even outstanding spine fellowships, there is a reason or reasons they are not ACGME accredited. ACGME has no interest in accreditating non-invasive spine training. Spine injections are not rocket science and most people don't need a year of training to learn how to do them IMHO. I do recommend residents to pursue fellowship training because it is important to have that added credentials to cover yourself and your patients.

I believe the few PM&R accredited pain fellowships are still quite different from the good Anesthesia based pain fellowships as the training is more comprehensive in true "pain management", covering the whole spectrum of acute, chronic, cancer pain. The PM&R pain fellowships may be more musculoskeletal and spine focus.
 
Actually, both the quality and number of applications have already dropped from what I've been told. As many of you might know, there was a discussion on this very subject at the AAPM&R meeting.

I think it would be a mistake to underestimate the value of ACGME-accreditation and being eligible to take the Pain boards. Previously, I think the Spine fellowships were a much better option because you could still take the Pain boards; that avenue is over, however.

I agree that fellowships such as Slipman, Stanford (run by our graduate who did an ACGME-accredited Pain fellowship), Pauza, HSS (at least one graduate you've mentioned from this fellowship felt the need to do a second ACGME-accredited Pain fellowship to further his career), etc. are excellent. However, the fact is that we are always developing new procedures and discovering that others don't work as well as we thought it might. Fellowship is only one year and in 7-10 years, you'll probably be doing different things than what you learned during your Spine fellowship. While technology, procedures, and the liability landscape may change, your CV and subspecialty certification will not. Will hospitals, academic centers, and groups require subspecialty certification in the future? You put it best when you said "Who knows?".
 
Stinky Tofu said:
Actually, both the quality and number of applications have already dropped from what I've been told. As many of you might know, there was a discussion on this very subject at the AAPM&R meeting.

I think it would be a mistake to underestimate the value of ACGME-accreditation and being eligible to take the Pain boards. Previously, I think the Spine fellowships were a much better option because you could still take the Pain boards; that avenue is over, however.

I agree that fellowships such as Slipman, Stanford (run by our graduate who did an ACGME-accredited Pain fellowship), Pauza, HSS (at least one graduate you've mentioned from this fellowship felt the need to do a second ACGME-accredited Pain fellowship to further his career), etc. are excellent. However, the fact is that we are always developing new procedures and discovering that others don't work as well as we thought it might. Fellowship is only one year and in 7-10 years, you'll probably be doing different things than what you learned during your Spine fellowship. While technology, procedures, and the liability landscape may change, your CV and subspecialty certification will not. Will hospitals, academic centers, and groups require subspecialty certification in the future? You put it best when you said "Who knows?".

1) Despite what Neuropathic has repetedly said, I really DON'T think even he/she believes you could train a monkey to do spine injections WELL. I also don't believe that in order to be a good interventionist you need to be a comprehensive pain management specialist. If I do 8-12 procedures a day, you can have ALL my fibromyalgics, (+) Waddells, inpatients, and yes, even my pumps and stims. Discography, transforaminals, sympathetic blocks, intradiscal procedures, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and their progeny, will keep me fully occupied, and you can have all of my wacko patients with my blessing

2) I don't think ANY anesthesiologist I have met is as well trained in cervical transforaminal approaches as are physiatrists.

3) The future of these procedures are surgicenters and specialty hospitals. As both of these will be for profit enterprises, they will NEVER deny you the right to generate revenues on their behalf. Ergo, do you REALLY think they WON'T privilege you?

4) Remind me again, where did Dr's el Abd at Spaulding, Plastaras at RIC, Lipitz, at LIJ (Past President of PASSOR), and Depalma at MCV (ACGME accredited programs all) train? Oh THAT'S right - that non-ACGME accredited program in Philly!

5) While I understand the fear of what the future may bring, in addition to looking good on paper, which I do not deny is important, what I believe is more important still is the decision making algorithm (ie who to do it on, and what to do, specifically) and needle skills necessary to access both the nerve root sleeve and the disc. While I entirely agree that procedures will change, what we inject, of what the tool will be, is secondary to being comfortable with the anatomy, the approaches, and the ability to get the instrument where it needs to be. THAT element of my training, at least to me, is paramount.
 
You can also add Dr. Isaac (who won the Earl C. Elkins award) to the list of SRH attendings who trained with Slipman. Like I said before, I think his fellowship is excellent, but was a more attractive option when you were still eligible to take the Pain boards. In fact, since you mentioned Dr. El Abd, you should know that he did take the Pain boards and passed. Clearly, he saw the value in hedging against any changes the future might bring. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if many of the others you've mentioned did the same thing.

I don't want it to be misconstrued that I am trying to discourage people from doing these fellowships. I just feel strongly that we should push to get these otherwise excellent fellowships ACGME-accredited. Not only would it be good for its graduates, but it would also be good for Physiatry in general. To accomplish this, we could either have them meet the requirements for an ACGME-accredited Pain fellowship program or push for the creation of an ACGME-accredited Interventional Spine fellowship. One of the concerns from people running these non-accredited fellowships is that they can no longer treat the fellows as attendings and have them bill independently. Every procedure would need to be supervised and for some of the people running these fellowships, that will ultimately hurt the bottom line. If people are still doing these fellowships, there's not as much of an incentive to change things. Anyway, there appears to be other factors in addition to the mounds of paperwork.

Lastly, I think that even at surgicenters and specialty hospitals, subspecialty certification could be an issue as well. Look at this post about an attending at a Children's hospital who had been practicing for 10+ years and was forced to do a fellowship. Unless you plan on opening your own surgicenter, being an attractive job applicant will still be important. Even in a group practice setting, those that have done an ACGME-accredited fellowship and have obtained subspecialty certification might be viewed as more attractive and less of a medico-legal risk. Ultimately, while your colleagues might not care, lawyers, hospital committees, and those determining reimbursements might. Irregardless of whether or not these things will happen or not in the future, I still think it's in the best interests of fellows and patients for a program to be accredited by the ACGME.
 
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, here is another point of view.

paz5559 said:
1) Despite what Neuropathic has repetedly said, I really DON'T think even he/she believes you could train a monkey to do spine injections WELL.

On the contrary, if the da Vinci robot is assisting surgeries these days, I don't see why you can't train a "monkey" to do injections.

paz5559 said:
If I do 8-12 procedures a day, you can have ALL my fibromyalgics, (+) Waddells, inpatients, and yes, even my pumps and stims. Discography, transforaminals, sympathetic blocks, intradiscal procedures, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and their progeny, will keep me fully occupied, and you can have all of my wacko patients with my blessing.

A good physician don't just keep doing procedures, you have to at least put half your effort to talk to your patients and show your concerns. There may be patients with complex psychosocial issues, but no one is a "wacko".

paz5559 said:
2) I don't think ANY anesthesiologist I have met is as well trained in cervical transforaminal approaches as are physiatrists.

You certainly have not met Gabor Racz, Leland Lou, Prithiv Raj, James Rathmell,...etc.

Good luck to you paz. The training is often what you made of it. It would still be an ongoing learning process after fellowships for everyone, whether it is the worst anesthesia program, or the best PM&R spine program. The difference is one is borad eligible and the other is not.
 
The ACGME will not accredit training experiences that only focus on technical skill acquisition. Indeed, one of the many requirements for becoming an ACGME-recognized sub-specialty is that it must be demonstrated that there is in existence a sufficient body of knowledge (ie academic/cognitive base) that goes beyond what is traditionally learned in a residency curriculum. This is the driving rationale for a fellowship...that is, that there is just "not enough time to learn it all..."

This why it has taken Neuromuscular Medicine (which will include six-months of EMG training in it core competencies) so long to come into its own. EMG'ers have been board certified by the AANEM, a bonafide non ACGME board, for decades. But, it is only relatively recently that the practice of electrodiagnostic and neuromuscular medicine has progressed substantially beyond doing and interpretting a procedure in the eyes of the ACGME. Now, most electromyographers not only perform and interpret various electrodiagnostic tests, but also make specific recommendations regarding a wide variety of neuromuscular disorders including what genetic tests to order, where to perform a biopsy, etc. With this scope of practice in mind, the ACGME recognizes the need for a Neuromuscular Medicine fellowship

It's my understanding that there has been very preliminary discussions about increasing the breadth of ACGME fellowships offered under the ABPMR umbrella. Currently, Pain, Peds, SCI, and very soon Neuromuscular Medicine are solely sponsored or co-sponsored by ABPMR. Two other potential fellowship programs include an Acquired Brain Disorders (ABD) program and Interventional Spinal Therapeutics (IST). ABD will likely include in its core competencies the comprehensive management of spasticity including chemodenervation and IST will, of course, include needle work. The success of these applications will hinge upon how well the sponsors can demonstrate a cognitive/academic base.

Relatedly, the whole ACGME Pain Medicine program requirements and core competencies are under review this year and the general feeling among those involved in the that group's RRC is that Pain Medicine needs to be broader in its scope so the focus is not on interventional skill acquisition only.

So, the way I read the tea leaves is as such: It depends what you want to do and where you want to do it. If you want to practice bread and butter musculoskeletal medicine away from an academic setting and only do selected interventional techniques in the lumbar spine and pelvis, you can probably get by without a formal ACGME-approved experience. Since, diagnostic and therapeutic axial spine injections are included in the core training of PM&R, you will have a good leg to stand on in terms of credentialing with your non-ACGME approved fellowship. If, however, you want to practice the full spectrum of Pain Medicine---malignant pain, cancer, chronic pain, inpatient/catheter management, etc---the ACGME fellowship looks like the route to go.

How all this will exactly play out remains to be seen.
 
drusso said:
The ACGME will not accredit training experiences that only focus on technical skill acquisition. Indeed, one of the many requirements for becoming an ACGME-recognized sub-specialty is that it must be demonstrated that there is in existence a sufficient body of knowledge (ie academic/cognitive base) that goes beyond what is traditionally learned in a residency curriculum. This is the driving rationale for a fellowship...that is, that there is just "not enough time to learn it all..."

Two other potential fellowship programs include an Acquired Brain Disorders (ABD) program and Interventional Spinal Therapeutics (IST). ABD will likely include in its core competencies the comprehensive management of spasticity including chemodenervation and IST will, of course, include needle work. The success of these applications will hinge upon how well the sponsors can demonstrate a cognitive/academic base.


From talking with Dr. Nicolas E Walsh, my Chairman and President of the ABPMR: At this time, there is not going to be any type of accredited fellowship in Interventional Spine in the near future(nor does he expect there to be). From reasons stated above, approval from ABMS, as well as turf battle policies that would be fought with the surgical subspecialties (namely Ortho and Neurosurg).

There was a rather interesting discussion I had with him recently on how PM&R was able to come to an agreement with American Board of Anesthesiology that enabled PM&R to become Board Certified in Pain Medicine. Trust me, alot of politikin was going on.

If we as a specialty expect to be taken seriously and respected, especially by Anesthesiology, we have to be prepared to be trained in all aspects of pain medicine. Both the medical management as well as the interventional side. Patients benefit most from a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach that includes medication management, psychological intervention, functional restoration in the form of therapy, and WHEN NEEDED spinal intervention. If you can get all of that from a "SPINE FELLOWSHIP", that's great.

The peds pain, the cancer pain, the headaches, and yes...even the dreaded fibromyalgia: whether you chose to accept those patients into your practice when you're done is up to you. But every one of those cases during your training will be a learning opportunity and will teach you how to approach the simplest to the most complex "back pain" patient. And don't you want to know the most for optimally managing your patients.

Stinky and Drusso won't say it, but I will. Just do the dang ACGME fellowship! It's a win-win situation. ;)

Just my thoughts anyway.
 
DigableCat said:
Stinky and Drusso won't say it, but I will. Just do the dang ACGME fellowship! It's a win-win situation. ;)

Just my thoughts anyway.

Thanks, Dig...I think that David St. Hubbins summed it up well...

"It's fine line between stupid and clever..."

David St. Hubbins
Lead singer and rhythm guitarist
Spinal Tap
 
drusso said:
Thanks, Dig...I think that David St. Hubbins summed it up well...

"It's fine line between stupid and clever..."

Well, since, despite all advice to the contrary, I decided to do a non-ACGME accredited fellowship, let me speak for the stupid people out here:

I believe that, amongst the 8 ACGME accredited PM&R Pain fellowships out there, there are really only two or three that are worth spending the additional year in training, and I will go so far as to name them - Furman, Windsor, and maybe MCV. All of the others are presently living on the fact that they are ACGME accredited, and not on the quality of training they provide (yes, I realize that disparages the likes of Harvard, UCLA, and the Michigan pain spot, but hey, it is just my opinion).

Anesthesia positions will ask you to do pain psych, acute pain, cancer pain, and pediatric pain rotations, taking away from the time you will dedicate to perfecting your technical skills. They will tell you this makes you a more "complete" pain doc, but for me, it just means I have less time dedicated toward doing what it was I did the fellowship for in the first place.

Slipman, Aprill, CINN, Wash U (Prather), RIC, HSS, Florida Spine Institute, Stanford, the Michigan spine spot, and Falco are all places where, IMHO, you will get FAR better training, and come away with MUCH stronger needle skills. Will you be pain boarded? Not by the ABA, but you will still be able to sit for the ABPM boards. Will you be able to do lumbar and cervical procedures comfortably? You bet.

So before you let yourself get railroaded into the idea that ACGME accreditation is the ONLY decision criteria, ask yourself one question - am I sacrificing the quality of my training in order to say I am pain boarded.

For me, although not an easy answer, my ultimate decision was that I wanted to be the most technically proficient practicioner I could, and then let my skills speak for themselves. I may be a lone voice on this side of the controversy, but it was not a slam dunk decision for me, and you shouldn't let DigableCat, the academic mafia of the RRC, or anyone else out there make up your mind for you.

Oh, and just to make things even more complicated, the RRC's are about to change all the rules about who is and is not ACGME accredited, and will insist that your program include Psych, Neuro, Anesthesia, and PM&R within the same academic center. So within the next year or two, programs that are currently ACGME accredited (ie with tenuous affiliations to distant academic instiututions) may not be for long!
 
I would be interested in knowing which ACGME fellowships you interviewed with and why you felt they were not comparable in your opinion.
 
This may be a motivating factor on why programs would rather not be ABMS acknowledged/ACGME accredited:


Fellows who are training in ABMS-approved fellowship programs (e.g., many EEG, neurophysiology fellowships) cannot bill Medicare separately as attendings and need all notes co-signed. Conversely, fellows who are training in non-ABMS fellowship programs, including the many subspecialties unrecognized currently by ABMS (e.g., stroke, neuro-oncology, neurointensive care, multiple sclerosis, behavioral neurology), often can bill Medicare separately as attendings, and do not need notes co-signed.


This was taken from an American Academy of Neurology webpage, but can just as easily be extrapolated to Pain fellowships as well.

http://www.aan.com/students/residents/FAQ.pdf

So you get paid as a fellow, while the program bills for your work as an attending.

Seems logical...no wonder no one is in a rush to be accredited.
 
Top