

Did anyone get accepted with a 16 AA or 16 TS on here? If so, please share your experience on how you are dealing with dental school right now. Or I just want to know did anyone ever fell in this category.
Not too long ago, Howard had an AA of 17 so I'm sure many people got in with 16s then. Things are harder now, but if you are a URM hope is not 100% lost. However, odds are not in your favor and I would echo what others have said about retaking. Also, if that is the absolute highest you are
able to get after optimal studying and testing situations you might want to keep other career options open. I do not think DAT score is necessarily a good indicator of how you will be as a dentist but it is an indicator of how you will perform on the tests needed to be a dentist. I'm sure you can do it so just put forth your best effort!

Hah! I was waiting for a URM comment... BAM!! There it is![]()
Did anyone get accepted with a 16 AA or 16 TS on here? If so, please share your experience on how you are dealing with dental school right now. Or I just want to know did anyone ever fell in this category.
I know of someone who is currently applying with a 16TS--got into one school and has an interview at a school whose range from what Bobby Fischer posted is a 17+. This person is a re-applicant and NOT a URM.
oh... and statistically this means............?
Did anyone get accepted with a 16 AA or 16 TS on here? If so, please share your experience on how you are dealing with dental school right now. Or I just want to know did anyone ever fell in this category.
yeah I agree with dentalworks on this. someone will probably know someone who knows someone who got a 17 or 16 DAT and got into dental school. that's great and all (and kudos to them)...but it's really insignificant because that person is an outlier in the application pool. if you're applying with that kind of a score, you better have an outstanding resume that would overshadow someone with more competitive stats. even then, i feel that the odds are still wayyy against you.
There's no reason to be a jerk. I am just answering the actual question the OP was asking. For reference:
He/she is wondering if there was ANYONE who got accepted with a 16 AA or a 16 TS. My answer was that yes, I know of someone who was accepted and has an interview elsewhere. I also provided some additional information I thought was warranted given what the previous posters stated. All of the information I gave is factual, and nowhere did I attempt to give advice to a possible applicant with these numbers.
Obviously this story I shard doesn't mean anything statistically, however that is not what the OP was asking. I don't assume the OP to be without reason, as you seem to, so I'm sure the OP knows the same.
You are assuming that just because I shared this experience, I think that the OP should apply with a 16 AA and/or a 16 TS and therefore treating me with a sarcastic hostility. First of all, that is not true, and not something that I even hinted at. I think if the OP has a 16 AA and/or TS that a retake is in order, however I am not one to give unsolicited advice, unlike the overzealous posters who came before me, so don't try to make me feel bad for 1)answering the actual question posed and 2) not assuming that the OP has these stats (you don't really know from the first post, do you? I can see how that assumption makes sense, however the OP might just be curious.).
It seems to me that you really like to make assumptions about people you have no way of knowing, and that, my friend, is a dangerous thing.
There's no reason to be a jerk. I am just answering the actual question the OP was asking. For reference:
He/she is wondering if there was ANYONE who got accepted with a 16 AA or a 16 TS. My answer was that yes, I know of someone who was accepted and has an interview elsewhere. I also provided some additional information I thought was warranted given what the previous posters stated. All of the information I gave is factual, and nowhere did I attempt to give advice to a possible applicant with these numbers.
Obviously this story I shard doesn't mean anything statistically, however that is not what the OP was asking. I don't assume the OP to be without reason, as you seem to, so I'm sure the OP knows the same.
You are assuming that just because I shared this experience, I think that the OP should apply with a 16 AA and/or a 16 TS and therefore treating me with a sarcastic hostility. First of all, that is not true, and not something that I even hinted at. I think if the OP has a 16 AA and/or TS that a retake is in order, however I am not one to give unsolicited advice, unlike the overzealous posters who came before me, so don't try to make me feel bad for 1)answering the actual question posed and 2) not assuming that the OP has these stats (you don't really know from the first post, do you? I can see how that assumption makes sense, however the OP might just be curious.).
It seems to me that you really like to make assumptions about people you have no way of knowing, and that, my friend, is a dangerous thing.
lol... whos treating who with hostility?
I asked you a question and all that came out? wow.... ur gonna have a great time dealing with sarcastic dental students 👍
Im sure its possible and Im sure it happens every cycle. But, odds are like 50 out of the 12,000 applicants.
Oh yes--because I responded to your sarcasm aimed at invalidating my point (which is that I have a friend who was accepted with a 16TS) in what I thought would be a tone appropriate to the tone I perceived you were throwing at me, I cannot deal with sarcastic people in my everyday life. Thanks for the astute observation, Sherlock. Of course, nothing could have been lost due to the fact that this forum deals with text and certain things such as tone must be inferred.
I maintain that there was no reason to be such a wiseass in your comment to me. You already spent an earlier post in the thread pointing out the fact that statistically the chances are very low for a person with those DAT scores:
Then, when I respond with an actual account of someone who got in, you ask me about the statistics of it? Please. We both know that your intentions weren't pure with that post, no matter how much you now claim that they were. You're just mad because I invalidated your point instead of the other way around, so you take to insulting my IRL interactions over an internet forum. This is laughable. 🤣