10 commandments for avoiding parasites

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

humuhumu

nukunuku apua'a
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
953
Reaction score
2
Inspired by a recent episode of This American Life on NPR (http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=332), I decided to have a little fun with parasites (i.e., the ones my class will be tested on next week). The parasites are in parentheses. Enjoy.

  1. Don't get bitten by tsetse flies (Trypanosoma brucei), triatomine bugs (Trypanosoma cruzi), sandflies (Leishmania spp.), or mosquitoes (Plasmodium spp., Wuchereria bancrofti).
  2. Don't eat raw meat (Toxoplasma gondii, Taenia saginata, Taenia solium), raw freshwater fish (Diphyllobothrium latum, Clonorchis sinensis), or raw freshwater crabs or crayfish (Paragonimus westermani).
  3. Don't drink water with copepods (Dracunculus medinensis).
  4. Don't eat poopy food or drink poopy water (Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum).
  5. Don't eat poopy dirt (Ascaris lumbricoides).
  6. Don't step in poopy dirt with your bare feet (Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis).
  7. Don't eat cat poop (Toxoplasma gondii) or dog poop (Echinococcus granulosus).
  8. Don't suck your thumb after scratching your bum (Enterobius vermicularis).
  9. Don't swim in lakes (Schistosoma spp.).
  10. Don't have sex (Trichomonas vaginalis).

Members don't see this ad.
 
Inspired by a recent episode of This American Life on NPR (http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=332), I decided to have a little fun with parasites (i.e., the ones my class will be tested on next week). The parasites are in parentheses. Enjoy.

  1. Don't get bitten by tsetse flies (Trypanosoma brucei), triatomine bugs (Trypanosoma cruzi), sandflies (Leishmania spp.), or mosquitoes (Plasmodium spp., Wuchereria bancrofti).
  2. Don't eat raw meat (Toxoplasma gondii, Taenia saginata, Taenia solium), raw freshwater fish (Diphyllobothrium latum, Clonorchis sinensis), or raw freshwater crabs or crayfish (Paragonimus westermani).
  3. Don't drink water with copepods (Dracunculus medinensis).
  4. Don't eat poopy food or drink poopy water (Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum).
  5. Don't eat poopy dirt (Ascaris lumbricoides).
  6. Don't step in poopy dirt with your bare feet (Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis).
  7. Don't eat cat poop (Toxoplasma gondii) or dog poop (Echinococcus granulosus).
  8. Don't suck your thumb after scratching your bum (Enterobius vermicularis).
  9. Don't swim in lakes (Schistosoma spp.).
  10. Don't have sex (Trichomonas vaginalis).

Just 10??? What about raw pork? IV drug abuse? This could be a fun thread that picks on all kinds of activities ....
 
Members don't see this ad :)
No sushi, swimming, or sex? Is there any point to living? :eek:

These are just the parasites. Wait until you get to bacteria!

What about raw pork? IV drug abuse?

Even though I'm not advocating IV drug abuse, you usually can't get parasitic infections from it. It's not meant to be a rousing endorsement of illicit IV use, but...I guess it has its advantages.

Taenia solium is found in raw pork. Which is a chance for a PSA: Don't cook your bacon by microwaving it. The microwave doesn't cook the bacon all the way through, leaving pockets of raw (possibly parasitic) goodness.

Don't get bitten by tsetse flies (Trypanosoma brucei), triatomine bugs (Trypanosoma cruzi), sandflies (Leishmania spp.), or mosquitoes (Plasmodium spp., Wuchereria bancrofti).

Also black flies (Onchocerca volvulus) or the mango fly (Loa loa). Yes, I know - makes you want to invest in a good fly swatter.

Don't swim in lakes (Schistosoma spp.).

Don't swim in poorly chlorinated swimming pools, either. [Naegleria fowleri]

Don't have sex (Trichomonas vaginalis).

Well...unless you're a gay man. Gay men have a LOT of other things to worry about but Trichomonas vaginalis is usually not one of them. (Just trying to find a little ray of optimism for all the gay guys reading this!)

Don't suck your thumb after scratching your bum (Enterobius vermicularis).

This is very sound advice.

And adding one more (#10a?): Don't wear contact lenses [Acanthamoeba]
 
Well...unless you're a gay man. Gay men have a LOT of other things to worry about but Trichomonas vaginalis is usually not one of them. (Just trying to find a little ray of optimism for all the gay guys reading this!)

Out of curiousity, in terms of parasites, like what?
 
But cat poop is so darn appealing -- that'll be hard. Even if I weren't a vegetarian, I'd avoid raw fish sushi, especially after hearing all the details of my biology professor's TA's tapeworm fun all thanks to sushi. :eek: The good news is that I don't think you can get anything from cucumber rolls. Another area where vegetarianism's the way to go. :thumbup:
 
Well...unless you're a gay man. Gay men have a LOT of other things to worry about but Trichomonas vaginalis is usually not one of them. (Just trying to find a little ray of optimism for all the gay guys reading this!)


men most certainly are a reservoir/source for trich, it just isn't something we go out of our way to look for. as my program director said "women aren't trich factories--it's gotta come from somewhere!"
 
No offense, bageldude, but if all you can have is cucumber rolls I think there's no point in sushi. :( Gimme an eel roll and some salmon sashimi and a spicy tuna roll dipped in those tasty little eggs any day. Mmm. Brain worms? Who cares!
 
No offense, bageldude, but if all you can have is cucumber rolls I think there's no point in sushi. :( Gimme an eel roll and some salmon sashimi and a spicy tuna roll dipped in those tasty little eggs any day. Mmm. Brain worms? Who cares!

It's bagelchick, not dude. ;) I never had sushi before I went veg -- the joys of growing up in Oklahoma where sushi didn't hit until about 6 years ago -- so I don't know what I'm missing. Cucumber rolls with wasabi ain't bad, though. Eel = :eek:
 
These are just the parasites. Wait until you get to bacteria!



Even though I'm not advocating IV drug abuse, you usually can't get parasitic infections from it. It's not meant to be a rousing endorsement of illicit IV use, but...I guess it has its advantages.

Taenia solium is found in raw pork. Which is a chance for a PSA: Don't cook your bacon by microwaving it. The microwave doesn't cook the bacon all the way through, leaving pockets of raw (possibly parasitic) goodness.



Also black flies (Onchocerca volvulus) or the mango fly (Loa loa). Yes, I know - makes you want to invest in a good fly swatter.



Don't swim in poorly chlorinated swimming pools, either. [Naegleria fowleri]



Well...unless you're a gay man. Gay men have a LOT of other things to worry about but Trichomonas vaginalis is usually not one of them. (Just trying to find a little ray of optimism for all the gay guys reading this!)



This is very sound advice.

And adding one more (#10a?): Don't wear contact lenses [Acanthamoeba]


Excellent additions! A future infectious disease doctor?
 
No offense, bageldude, but if all you can have is cucumber rolls I think there's no point in sushi. :( Gimme an eel roll and some salmon sashimi and a spicy tuna roll dipped in those tasty little eggs any day. Mmm. Brain worms? Who cares!

Fortunately all the sushi you're talking about comes from the ocean, not fresh water. I haven't heard about parasites that infect marine fish....and maybe I don't want to...

(Actually, plenty of parasites infect marine fish, but I'm wondering about ones that might make humans sick if the flesh of the infected fish is consumed raw with soy sauce and wasabi.)
 
men most certainly are a reservoir/source for trich, it just isn't something we go out of our way to look for. as my program director said "women aren't trich factories--it's gotta come from somewhere!"

Gay men too? I know that straight men can get it from their female partners, but haven't heard of gay men getting it from other men.

It's bagelchick, not dude. ;) I never had sushi before I went veg -- the joys of growing up in Oklahoma where sushi didn't hit until about 6 years ago -- so I don't know what I'm missing. Cucumber rolls with wasabi ain't bad, though. Eel = :eek:

Have you ever had ****ake mushroom maki? Mmmm...
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Gay men too? I know that straight men can get it from their female partners, but haven't heard of gay men getting it from other men.


most men with trich are asymptomatic. add that we don't tend to look for it in men very often...I don't know that there's any data out there to show that homosexual men don't get trich.
 
Another area where vegetarianism's the way to go.

Unless you wash your vegetables in contaminated water...ewww... :(

Excellent additions! A future infectious disease doctor?

Aww, thanks :love: I do like ID a lot, but, mostly, I'm just a huge worry wart. Microbio just gave me a good excuse to be a worry wart in public.

Have you ever had ****ake mushroom maki? Mmmm...

Whoa, wait - this is WEIRD. I swear, when I typed ****ake, I typed the whole word. SDN censors words automatically?!?! SDN censored the word ****ake??? :confused:
 
Giardia Lamblia is one that could (theoretically) affect gay men more than straight ones. I'm not sure of any others.

Amebiasis is another parasitic disease that is apparently more prevalent in MSM (like giardiasis, due to sexual contact that leads to fecal-oral transmission).
 
Amebiasis is another parasitic disease that is apparently more prevalent in MSM (like giardiasis, due to sexual contact that leads to fecal-oral transmission).

Has no one watched Clerks 2? You never go ass to mouth!
 
A lot of misconceptions and stereotypes thrown around are that straight men are celibate sexual beings that only perform monogamous, standard male to female vaginal sex and that gay men are promiscuous sexual fiends that engage in all kinds of risky practices. Ever since the AIDS epidemic, I know many gay men that practice safe sex and monogamy and know straight men that scare the hell out of me about their unprotected romps with multiple partners. Just something to think about when you label it something gay men get and straight men get.
 
A lot of misconceptions and stereotypes thrown around are that straight men are celibate sexual beings that only perform monogamous, standard male to female vaginal sex and that gay men are promiscuous sexual fiends that engage in all kinds of risky practices. Ever since the AIDS epidemic, I know many gay men that practice safe sex and monogamy and know straight men that scare the hell out of me about their unprotected romps with multiple partners. Just something to think about when you label it something gay men get and straight men get.

Actually, in these cases, it has nothing to do with "risky" practices, and especially has nothing to do with monogamy/promiscuity. It's a bigger question of where these parasites flourish. Trich grows well in the vagina, but not well in the anus. (According to some UK health website - can't find the link right now.) Gay men who never have sex with a woman probably wouldn't get it. Other things, like Giardia, DO grow well in the GI tract (which includes the anus). If your partner, who is in a monogomous relationship with you, goes camping and gets Giardia, you could get it too. It has NOTHING to do with promiscuity.
 
It's promiscuity (e.g., number of sexual partners / year) and condom use, whether gay, straight, or bi that are important issues here with respect to risk of sexually transmitted infection. Gay & Bi men do an elevated risk of sexually transmitted infections, but so do "...unmarried individuals, women younger than 40 and men aged 20-29, blacks and women in the South were all at elevated risk for STDs because of multiple partnership." (see abstract below)

Here are some articles:

Lakartidningen. 2001 Apr 11;98(15):1793-5.
[HIV, gonorrhea, chlamydia and syphilis are increasing among homosexual men][Article in Swedish]

Karlsson A, Hejdeman B, Pernetun T, Sandström E.
Södersjukhuset, Stockholm. [email protected]

The incidence of gonorrhoea, chlamydia, syphilis and HIV infection is increasing among homosexual men in Stockholm, Sweden. This indicates that the frequency of unsafe sex is on the increase while the use of condoms is decreasing.

PMID: 11374006 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Infez Med. 2001 Sep;9(3):147-53.

Manfredi R, Beltrami C, D'Antuono A, Chiodo F, Varotti C.
Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica Specialistica e Sperimentale, Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Universit degli Studi di Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliera di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.

In order to assess the relationship between a diagnosis of sexually-transmitted disease (STD), sexual behaviour, condom use, and other social, demographic, and epidemiological variables in a cohort of young adults who referred to a STD centre during a 9-year period, all patients aged 13-20 years were prospectively evaluated, with special attention paid to sexual behaviour, and use of condom or other contraceptive techniques. The 284 assessed young adults represented 6.1% of all patients with a diagnosis of STD: an increasing temporal trend was noticed (from 3. % in 1991, up to 10.4% nel 1999: p<.0001). On the whole, 70.1% of subjects aged 20 years or less never used a condom during the 6 months preceding the diagnosis of STD: only 21.8% of patients reported regular condom use, and 4.9% more subjects referred occasional use, while in the remaining 3.2% of cases other contraceptive methods were employed. Among under age patients (10.6% of study population), the rate of condom use was 3.3% only, while male homosexuals always denied the use of barrier methods.

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2004 Oct;2(10):833-40.
Syphilis with HIV coinfection][Article in German]

K&#246;rber A, Dissemond J, Lehnen M, Franckson T, Grabbe S, Esser S.
Klinik und Poliklinik f&#252;r Dermatologie und Venerologie, STD-Kompetenzzentrum Nordrhein, Universit&#228;tsklinikum Essen.

In recent years a rising incidence of syphilis has been observed, especially in the population of homosexual men. Because of altered sexual behavior in terms of increased promiscuity paralleled by decreased use of condoms and the fact that a syphilis infection increases the susceptibility to HIV coinfection, the incidence of HIV is also rising once again in this population.

1: Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):228-36.
Sexual partnership patterns as a behavioral risk factor for sexually transmitted diseases.Finer LB, Darroch JE, Singh S.
Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York, USA.

"combining women's and men's partnership reports suggests that about 17 million women aged 15-44--34% of those sexually active in the past year--were at risk for STDs because of direct exposure to multiple partners (5.4 million), indirect exposure (6.3 million) or both direct and indirect exposure (5.5 million). In all, 21% of women were at direct risk and 23% were at indirect risk. In comparison, among men aged 18-44, 24% were at direct risk for STDs and an unknown proportion were at indirect risk. Multivariate analyses indicated that unmarried individuals, women younger than 40 and men aged 20-29, blacks and women in the South were all at elevated risk for STDs because of multiple partnership.

AIDS. 2002 Jun 14;16(9):1271-7. Links
HIV, syphilis and heterosexual bridging among Peruvian men who have sex with men.Tabet S, Sanchez J, Lama J, Goicochea P, Campos P, Rouillon M, Cairo JL, Ueda L, Watts D, Celum C, Holmes KK.
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

CONCLUSIONS: Among MSM in Peru, HIV and syphilis prevalence and HIV incidence were high, especially among cross-dressers. The high prevalence of bisexuality and low rates of consistent condom use, especially with female sexual partners indicates potential HIV transmission into the heterosexual population.

PMID: 12045493 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
It's promiscuity (e.g., number of sexual partners / year) and condom use, whether gay, straight, or bi that are important issues here with respect to risk of sexually transmitted infection.

**Sigh**

You're right - promiscuity and condom use play a big role in the risk of getting a "traditional" STI, which is caused by a virus or a bacteria.

However, we were talking about PARASITES. Condoms will NOT prevent sexually transmitted parasite infections, which are often transmitted by the fecal-oral route. (The exception, of course, being Trich vag).

All the articles that you posted dealt with syphilis, chlamydia, Hep, HIV, etc - none of which are parasites. If someone posts something on how to avoid bacterial infections or viral infections, then yes - they would become relevant then.
 
**Sigh**

You're right - promiscuity and condom use play a big role in the risk of getting a "traditional" STI, which is caused by a virus or a bacteria.

However, we were talking about PARASITES. Condoms will NOT prevent sexually transmitted parasite infections, which are often transmitted by the fecal-oral route. (The exception, of course, being Trich vag).

All the articles that you posted dealt with syphilis, chlamydia, Hep, HIV, etc - none of which are parasites. If someone posts something on how to avoid bacterial infections or viral infections, then yes - they would become relevant then.

You're right, when it comes to parasites, sexual transmission (gay or straight) is not the most important route. I was mainly responding to Lifetimedoc's concern. He specifically mentions condoms and gays and sexuality in particular. You may not want to talk about it, but he raised the question, which is why I addressed it. Also, the bigger concerns are the "traditional" STD's, so this is really the more important public health topic, even if it wasn't in the subject of the original post of this thread. Parasitic STD's don't have nearly the mortality.

... Ever since the AIDS epidemic, I know many gay men that practice safe sex and monogamy and know straight men that scare the hell out of me about their unprotected romps with multiple partners. Just something to think about when you label it something gay men get and straight men get.

He quotes no studies and gives anecdotal information that seems to conflict with some of the articles that I quote above. That's why I cited the articles and why they are relevant ... I do give some sources; and I'm certainly willing to learn more about the subject (there may be better studies out there, for example). I also recognize that this is a sensitive issue and I'm not suggesting that I have anything against gays. Heterosexual men & women are also at risk for STD's; I'm also not going to suggest we all become celebate. However to suggest that gay men are less promiscuous than straight men doesn't seem to match the data from scientific studies.

I do have a complaint. You minimize the issue of promiscuity (ignore it?), which is an error, in my opinion. You can't tell me that promiscuity has nothing to do with rates of transmission of sexually transmitted parasites. It's an important factor that cannot be ignored or minimized if you look at the data. It would be stunning if promiscuity had nothing to do with rates of transmission of sexually transmitted parasites. Yes, I realize most parasites are not transmitted this way, but academic medicine studies all kinds of diseases and modes of transmission that are rare; just because it is rare doesn't mean that is isn't interesting.

I realize Lifetimedoc expanded the subject of discussion, and I think he addresses an interesting point even if you limit it to parasites since fecal-oral transmission of parasites could conceptually could be a concern in men who have sex with men (MSM's) given the nature of their sexual activity (anal).

From what I see in the literature, there is no reason to believe that MSMs have lower incidence of sexually transmitted parasites and many reasons to believe it would be higher, along with the risk for much more serious STD's. Higher promiscuity and the nature of MSM sex are almost certainly big factors.

Looking at the literature, it looks like for MSM's, giardiasis is an issue, although not a major one. Note that this diarrheal illness is caused by a one-celled, microscopic parasite, so I'm on topic here.

Here is a study demonstrating increased MSM promiscuity relative to men who do not have sex with men (cite me a better study if you have one). There are other studies like this, but not studies of U.S. & European men that I would like to be able to cite.

1: AIDS. 1995 Feb;9(2):171-6.
Same-sex behavior, sexually transmitted diseases and HIV risks among young northern Thai men.Beyrer C, Eiumtrakul S, Celentano DD, Nelson KE, Ruckphaopunt S, Khamboonruang C.
Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risks for HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases (STD) among young northern Thai men who have sex with men (MSM), and to examine the possible role of male same-sex behavior in the northern Thai HIV/AIDS epidemic. METHODS: Two cohorts of northern Thai military conscripts and one cohort of recently discharged conscripts, a total of 2047 men, were studied. Data were collected by interview on behavioral risk factors, and sera were examined for syphilis and HIV-1 antibodies. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine risk factors associated with HIV and STD, and to assess the frequency and patterns of same-sex behaviors among these men. RESULTS: Of 2047 men, 134 (6.5%) reported one or more male lifetime sex partners. Of these MSM, 130 (97.0%) also had female partners, and four (3.0%) had exclusively male partners. Compared with men who reported only female sex partners, MSM had a higher number of lifetime sex partners, a higher mean number of female sex partners, more female and male commercial sex worker (CSW) partners, and were more likely to be married. MSM were significantly more likely than exclusively heterosexual men to report having had any STD [odds ratio (OR), 2.72], gonorrhea (OR, 2.05), syphilis (OR, 3.17), non-gonococcal urethritis (OR, 4.54) and penile discharges (OR, 6.24). They were at borderline increased risk for HIV infection [OR, 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-2.41]. Men with more than one lifetime male sex partner compared with those with only one partner were significantly more likely to be HIV-infected (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.09-7.19). CONCLUSIONS: Northern Thai MSM are a high-risk population for STD, including HIV. Reported same-sex behavior in this population appears to vary considerably with data collection techniques. HIV and STD prevention strategies aimed at changing unsafe sexual practices may need to be targeted to the general population of young Thai men.

PMID: 7718188 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Here is an article that shows that MSMs are at increased risk for giardiasis. Further down, another older article talks about amebiasis (also caused by a parasite):

AIDS Educ Prev. 2005 Dec;17(6 Suppl B):49-59. Links
Trends in infectious diseases and the male to female ratio: possible clues to changes in behavior among men who have sex with men.Beltrami JF, Shouse RL, Blake PA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. [email protected]

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are a priority population for HIV care and prevention programs. This report describes HIV and other sexually transmitted disease (STD) trends among MSM in metropolitan Atlanta by analyzing nine databases. We describe the use of the male-to-female (M:F) ratio, a surrogate marker for MSM in databases without standardized MSM variables that is recommended as an indirect measure of HIV risk behavior in the CDC/HRSA Integrated Guidelines for Developing Epidemiologic Profiles. During 1997 to 2001, there were increases among MSM for reported syphilis (from 9% to 17%), anti-biotic-resistant gonorrhea (from 4.8% to 8.6%), and HIV seroprevalence (from 33% to 43%). During 1998 to 2001, the M:F ratio for cases peaked at 12:1 during a hepatitis A outbreak among MSM, increased for shigellosis (from 1:0 to 18:1) and giardiasis (from 1.7 to 2.1), and did not appreciably change for hepatitis B, salmonellosis, or chlamydia. HIV and several other STDs appear to have increased among MSM in metropolitan Atlanta. When standardized MSM variables are not available, an M:F ratio is useful.

PMID: 16401182 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

An old article about incidence of giardisis and amebiasis being greater among MSMs:

Rev Med Brux. 1989 Oct;10(8):327-34.Links
[Sexually-transmissible anorectal diseases][Article in French]

Paulet P, Stoffels G.
Several anorectal diseases are described. Most are sexually transmitted (gay bowel syndrome or heterosexual transmission). The clinical aspect of nearly all of them is similar. Thus, the diagnosis usually cannot be done on clinical grounds alone: one has to request the help of the laboratory. Amebiasis, giardiasis, chancroid and donovanosis are frequent in Africa but rare in our countries, except in male homosexuals. ...

PMID: 2682913 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

So, while sexual transmission of parasites is not a huge public health issue, within the realm of medical trivia reported in the literature, MSMs are at a greater risk for sexual transmission of parasites and several other important sexually transmitted diseases.
 
He quotes no studies and gives anecdotal information that seems to conflict with some of the articles that I quote above.

That was just my opinion/experience and was stated as such. I didn't quote statistics anywhere. :rolleyes:

I realize Lifetimedoc expanded the subject of discussion, and I think he addresses an interesting point even if you limit it to parasites since fecal-oral transmission of parasites could conceptually could be a concern in men who have sex with men (MSM's) given the nature of their sexual activity (anal).

My only point was that labeling things (and it wasn't expanding the discussion in that some posters were throwing around stereotypical labels) as "gay" or "straight" neglects the fact that certain routes of infection are not exclusive to one particular sexual orientation. If you assume that a particular transmission route is only found in one particular "type" of person, you neglect the act of their actual behavior. i.e. you might overlook something in a patient who is married with children, when their behavior with their wife, or other partners, might not fit in with the straight-male stereotype.

I just don't think it's relevant to label something that gay men get or that straight men get, but should rather be looking at routes of transmission. Using those labels muddles the arguments, IMHO.
 
That was just my opinion/experience and was stated as such. I didn't quote statistics anywhere. :rolleyes:

Yes, agreed.

My only point was that labeling things (and it wasn't expanding the discussion in that some posters were throwing around stereotypical labels) as "gay" or "straight" neglects the fact that certain routes of infection are not exclusive to one particular sexual orientation. If you assume that a particular transmission route is only found in one particular "type" of person, you neglect the act of their actual behavior. i.e. you might overlook something in a patient who is married with children, when their behavior with their wife, or other partners, might not fit in with the straight-male stereotype.

Yes, very true. We do need to consider the behavior. Thanks for your insight. :)

Also, in one of the studies above, I was surprised that most MSM's have sex with men and women and many are married (to women presumably). Not sure how that translates to other groups / countries, but it's not something I expected. I thought that the majority MSMs were more or less exclusively so.
 
I do have a complaint. You minimize the issue of promiscuity (ignore it?), which is an error, in my opinion. You can't tell me that promiscuity has nothing to do with rates of transmission of sexually transmitted parasites.

I still think that, when it comes to parasites, promiscuity is less important, just because of the route of transmission for a parasite is so different from the route of transmission for a virus.

Ex. 1: Guy A and Guy B are in a monogamous relationship. Guy A suddenly gets Hep B. He's not a health care worker, has been in perfect health until recently, and swears that he doesn't do illicit drugs. It's pretty clear that Guy B has been monogamous, but that Guy A has been promiscuous.

Ex. 2: Guy A and Guy B are in a monogamous relationship. Guy A and Guy B suddenly get giardiasis. Guy A went camping a little while ago, so he got this "STI" while camping, even though he's still monogamous.

Promiscuity has less to do with the giardiasis than it does with the Hep B. I didn't say that promiscuity would have anything to do with the rate of transmission. I WAS saying that being monogamous doesn't lessen your risk of getting certain parasites.

As for labels - learning about disease in microbio will always revolve around epidemiology and generalizations. Does everyone fit those generalizations? No. And any medical student with an ounce of common sense should realize that the generalizations that they learned will NOT reflect the patients that they see, one-on-one, in a clinic. I'm sorry if you thought it was too broad of a generalization.
 
I still think that, when it comes to parasites, promiscuity is less important, just because of the route of transmission for a parasite is so different from the route of transmission for a virus. ...

"Less important" and "nothing to do with" are two different things. You have softened your stance, and I agree, sexual transmission of parasites is much much less common than other routes. I have said as much before.

However, this is different from what you said previously. Here is your quote (which you bolded):

Actually, in these cases, it has nothing to do with "risky" practices, and especially has nothing to do with monogamy/promiscuity. It's a bigger question of where these parasites flourish. Trich grows well in the vagina, but not well in the anus. (According to some UK health website - can't find the link right now.) Gay men who never have sex with a woman probably wouldn't get it. Other things, like Giardia, DO grow well in the GI tract (which includes the anus). If your partner, who is in a monogomous relationship with you, goes camping and gets Giardia, you could get it too. It has NOTHING to do with promiscuity.

This appears to be false. There appears to be some relationship to monogamy & promiscuity to incidence of giardiasis (and MSM, in particular), although it by far not the primary mode of transmission. Also, many (most?) MSMs do appear to have sex with women, at least in the studies I have seen (I'm curious as to whether anyone else has better studies).

Giardiais is not always a huge issue in all homosexual populations. Here is one study that shows low prevelance. It just says that they did not find a correlation.

Int J STD AIDS. 1999 Dec;10(12):780-4. Links
Intestinal protozoa in homosexual men in Edinburgh.Pakianathan MR, McMillan A.
Department of Medicine, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, UK.

Our objective was to determine the prevalence of intestinal protozoa in homosexual men attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic, to compare it with the prevalence in a previous study from the same clinic, and to examine the relationship, if any, between the presence of protozoa and sexual practices. Men who consecutively attended the clinic and who gave a history of having had recent sexual contact with another male were invited to provide a stool sample for protozoological examination. Diarrhoeal samples were examined by direct microscopy for trophozoites and cysts and, after staining, for Cryptosporidium spp. In all cases, a modified formol-ether method was used to concentrate protozoal cysts before microscopy. One hundred and seventy-five of the 257 men invited to participate in the study provided a stool sample. At least one species of protozoan was found in 99 (57%) men. Giardia intestinalis was identified in only 5 (3%) men. Blastocystis hominis { intestinal microscopic parasite} was found in 46 (26%) men, but the presence of this protozoan was not associated with diarrhoea. Other than the prevalence of Entamoeba dispar/histolytica and G. intestinalis, which remained unchanged, the proportion of men who harboured the non-pathogenic protozoa was significantly increased from 1981/82. A correlation between oral-anal sex or peno-insertive or peno-receptive anal intercourse and the prevalence of protozoa was not found. There was also no correlation between the number of species of protozoa carried and these sexual practices. The presence of protozoa was not associated with a history of foreign travel or sexual contact with a man who had recently travelled outside the UK. The study showed that, although the prevalence of infection is low, giardiasis is still transmissible amongst homosexual men. A correlation between individual sexual practices and the prevalence of intestinal protozoa was not found.

PMID: 10639057 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]



AIDS Educ Prev. 2005 Dec;17(6 Suppl B):49-59. Links
Trends in infectious diseases and the male to female ratio: possible clues to changes in behavior among men who have sex with men.Beltrami JF, Shouse RL, Blake PA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. [email protected]

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are a priority population for HIV care and prevention programs. This report describes HIV and other sexually transmitted disease (STD) trends among MSM in metropolitan Atlanta by analyzing nine databases. We describe the use of the male-to-female (M:F) ratio, a surrogate marker for MSM in databases without standardized MSM variables that is recommended as an indirect measure of HIV risk behavior in the CDC/HRSA Integrated Guidelines for Developing Epidemiologic Profiles. During 1997 to 2001, there were increases among MSM for reported syphilis (from 9% to 17%), anti-biotic-resistant gonorrhea (from 4.8% to 8.6%), and HIV seroprevalence (from 33% to 43%). During 1998 to 2001, the M:F ratio for cases peaked at 12:1 during a hepatitis A outbreak among MSM, increased for shigellosis (from 1:0 to 18:1) and giardiasis (from 1.7 to 2.1), and did not appreciably change for hepatitis B, salmonellosis, or chlamydia. HIV and several other STDs appear to have increased among MSM in metropolitan Atlanta. When standardized MSM variables are not available, an M:F ratio is useful.

PMID: 16401182 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.cdc.gov/Ncidod/dpd/parasites/giardiasis/factsht_giardia.htm#transmission

Who is most likely to get giardiasis?
Anyone can get giardiasis. Persons more likely to become infected include

Children who attend day care centers, including diaper-aged children
Child care workers
Parents of infected children
International travelers
People who swallow water from contaminated sources
Backpackers, hikers, and campers who drink unfiltered, untreated water
Swimmers who swallow water while swimming in lakes, rivers, ponds, and streams
People who drink from shallow wells
Contaminated water includes water that has not been boiled, filtered, or disinfected with chemicals. Several community-wide outbreaks of giardiasis have been linked to drinking municipal water or recreational water contaminated with Giardia .

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984 Mar;33(2):239-45. Links
Intestinal protozoa in homosexual men of the San Francisco Bay area: prevalence and correlates of infection.Markell EK, Havens RF, Kuritsubo RA, Wingerd J.
To compare the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in male homosexuals selected from other sources with the levels previously reported from clinic-derived populations, various homosexual groups of the San Francisco Bay Area were checked by means of stool examination and questionnaires for prevalence of intestinal parasites and for related sexual behavioral patterns during a 3-year period. ... Infection with E. histolytica (single celled parasitic animal) was correlated significantly with a prior history of syphilis or gonorrhea (P less than 0.0001), with the number of sexual partners in the preceding 12-month period (P less than 0.0001), and with the reported frequency of oral-anal sexual contact (P less than 0.001). Giardial infection was also significantly related to oral-anal sex (P less than 0.001). No relation was seen between the presence or absence of gastrointestinal symptoms and infection with pathogenic protozoa. Factors associated with parasitic infection differed little from those found in previous studies, although significance levels were considerably higher because of the larger size of our study group.

PMID: 6711741 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Bottom line is homosexual men are at risk for sexual transmission of parasites, and there is reason to believe that anal intercourse plays a role, even if it is not as important as other forms of transmission. High relative promiscuity in homosexual populations is documented, and, since this is a sexually transmitted disease and sexually transmitted disease incidence increases with the number of sex partners, promiscuity / monogomy plays a role (more than "nothing").
 
I don't feel like talking about parasites because I have to ID those mofo's every other day in the lab. It sucks, and I hate playing around in poop.

I just wanted to say that I am thoroughly disappointed that naegleria brain, giardia, and trichomoniasis have not commented on this thread.
 
I don't feel like talking about parasites because I have to ID those mofo's every other day in the lab. It sucks, and I hate playing around in poop.

I just wanted to say that I am thoroughly disappointed that naegleria brain, giardia, and trichomoniasis have not commented on this thread.

I had no idea that you had this connection. Is this something you do as part of the actual coursework or do have a job related to this?
 
I had no idea that you had this connection. Is this something you do as part of the actual coursework or do have a job related to this?

I'm a med tech. During the summer, I am splitting 70-hour work weeks between two hospital labs. I only work 10-30 hours/week during the academic year.

Actually to be fair to the real med techs on SDN, I am MP,M(ASCP) as opposed to MT(ASCP). This means that my certification is for clinical microbiology and molecular pathology rather than medical technology. I can read diff's and run the analyzers if need be, but my job consists mainly of cultures and susceptibilities. My Master's is in Microbiology, Cell, and Molecular Biology.

Luckily for me, most of the O&P's are negative. I haven't had the pleasure of looking at E. vermicularis eggs scotch-taped off of some kid's ass in some time.

[SOAPBOX]
Perhaps sadly, my school has done away with the microbiology laboratory altogether, and I have had to teach some M4's who have had no idea that the human mouth is full of alpha strep. It would really help them read our reports if they would find time to at least visit the lab and take a look at how a blood culture machine works or what methods we use to derive susceptibilities.
[/SOAPBOX]
 
I'm a med tech. During the summer, I am splitting 70-hour work weeks between two hospital labs. I only work 10-30 hours/week during the academic year.

....

Pretty cool. I would imagine that micro was straightforward for you then ....
 
Pretty cool. I would imagine that micro was straightforward for you then ....

Micro is next semester where I am, but I used all of the school's online course material to study for my certification exams. It's the class that I am least worried about.
 
Micro is next semester where I am, but I used all of the school's online course material to study for my certification exams. It's the class that I am least worried about.

There's a guy in our class who was a microbiology lab tech at Mayo before med school. He runs weekly review sessions for micro and sends study guides out to the class. It's been incredibly helpful.

BTW, I loved micro lab! Definitely made an impression. Unfortunately we didn't have the pleasure of observing pinworm eggs on Scotch tape. But here's a nice video: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/13/e12/DC1
 
There's a guy in our class who was a microbiology lab tech at Mayo before med school. He runs weekly review sessions for micro and sends study guides out to the class. It's been incredibly helpful.

BTW, I loved micro lab! Definitely made an impression. Unfortunately we didn't have the pleasure of observing pinworm eggs on Scotch tape. But here's a nice video: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/13/e12/DC1

Nice video. I saved that one!
 
There's a guy in our class who was a microbiology lab tech at Mayo before med school. He runs weekly review sessions for micro and sends study guides out to the class. It's been incredibly helpful.

BTW, I loved micro lab! Definitely made an impression. Unfortunately we didn't have the pleasure of observing pinworm eggs on Scotch tape. But here's a nice video: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/13/e12/DC1

And thus ends my interest in gastroenterology...

Unfortunately my class doesn't seem to be as interested in microbiology. I publicly invited everyone over to the lab (which is closer to our classroom building than the nearest cafeteria) to see how we run the tests, but I didn't get any interest. :( I think that they would prefer it if I would just make up a sheet with words for them to memorize.
 
And thus ends my interest in gastroenterology...

Unfortunately my class doesn't seem to be as interested in microbiology. I publicly invited everyone over to the lab (which is closer to our classroom building than the nearest cafeteria) to see how we run the tests, but I didn't get any interest. :( I think that they would prefer it if I would just make up a sheet with words for them to memorize.

You don't think those worms are kinda cute? :laugh:

I never forget this one description of a kid who was infected. The kid would pass gas and during that very instant of flatulence the worms would be partially pushed outside the anus and then they would crawl back in. I'm glad my kids haven't had that.

Here is about as close as I could get:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiHtUFuGgSA . I guess these are pinworms ... somehow this just isn't the usual case of acne.

I'm not sure which is worse ... those pinworms or the botfly larvae (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFYdgXbCZoc)

I feel itchy for some reason.
 
Luckily for me, most of the O&P's are negative. I haven't had the pleasure of looking at E. vermicularis eggs scotch-taped off of some kid's ass in some time.

I read a story in Placebo Journal about this woman who complained of severe pruritis in her perianal region. Her doctor advised her to do the scotch tape test, and then put the pieces of scotch tape on glass slides so that he could examine them.

She came in a few days later, and explained that she had done the tape test, but that she hadn't had any scotch tape in the house. So, instead, she used duct tape instead - and handed him some slides wrapped with silver metallic duct tape that had pubic hairs sticking out the sides.
 
I read a story in Placebo Journal about this woman who complained of severe pruritis in her perianal region. Her doctor advised her to do the scotch tape test, and then put the pieces of scotch tape on glass slides so that he could examine them.

She came in a few days later, and explained that she had done the tape test, but that she hadn't had any scotch tape in the house. So, instead, she used duct tape instead - and handed him some slides wrapped with silver metallic duct tape that had pubic hairs sticking out the sides.

I'm going to need Botox injections to keep a straight face in moments like this.:D
 
I read a story in Placebo Journal about this woman who complained of severe pruritis in her perianal region. Her doctor advised her to do the scotch tape test, and then put the pieces of scotch tape on glass slides so that he could examine them.

She came in a few days later, and explained that she had done the tape test, but that she hadn't had any scotch tape in the house. So, instead, she used duct tape instead - and handed him some slides wrapped with silver metallic duct tape that had pubic hairs sticking out the sides.

:eek:

That brings up an interesting point about pubes. For some reason, it really disturbs me to see pubes on swabs used for GBS screens. It makes me think that there must be some kind of Amazon forest down there that the doc has to navigate through to get to the into the holiest of holies.
 
And thus ends my interest in gastroenterology...

Unfortunately my class doesn't seem to be as interested in microbiology. I publicly invited everyone over to the lab (which is closer to our classroom building than the nearest cafeteria) to see how we run the tests, but I didn't get any interest. :( I think that they would prefer it if I would just make up a sheet with words for them to memorize.

Maybe you can show me sometime next year. I wouldn't mind watching.
 
Top