-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
.
Started by stickflip723
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
My understanding on this subject is that the uber-specialties want you to do research in thier fields.
Why don't you wait and see how you handle your classes first before making up these grandiose plans. Research won't be important if you're failing and/or falling behind your studies.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hey y'all,
I'm but a lowly MS0 matriculating next year who's hoping to hit the ground running and churn out four years of productive research. I'm someone who want's to keep all their options open. I fully realize that I may decide later on to pursue a specialty that is not terribly competitive, or just want to match somewhere close to the fam that also won't require a killer resumé.
However, as it currently stands, I'd like to pursue a career in academic medicine, and am gravitating towards more competitive specialties like neurosurgery, for example. If I want to snag a spot at a top tier residency, will I be shooting myself in the foot if I concentrate my research in something like policy and/or healthcare economics? Do those top spots favor more bench/clinical oriented research?
I'm just trying to keep every door open to me (and realize there's a lot more that goes into residency match than just what type of research one does). Any advice at all is greatly appreciated. Thanks y'all.
I mean, its not a binary answer.
If you want to be competitive for the very "top" residencies in the most competitive fields, it behooves you to be as competitive an applicant as possible. As far as research goes, that means the MOST competitive applicants will have research related to the competitive field to which they are applying.
That being said, research in an unrelated field is better than no research (and is essentially required for the "top tier" places in competitive fields). It doesn't mean that you cannot match to a top tier place with non field-specific research, but as I said, the MOST competitive people will have field-specific research.
My suggestion: find research projects in the most competitive field you think you are interested in. If that ends up being the field to which you apply, great. If not, you can still get a higher volume of research/pubs than people who didn't start til later if you start early, and you can always try to find more "last-minute" field-related stuff in third year once you really know what you want to do (or earlier).
I mean, its not a binary answer.
If you want to be competitive for the very "top" residencies in the most competitive fields, it behooves you to be as competitive an applicant as possible. As far as research goes, that means the MOST competitive applicants will have research related to the competitive field to which they are applying.
That being said, research in an unrelated field is better than no research (and is essentially required for the "top tier" places in competitive fields). It doesn't mean that you cannot match to a top tier place with non field-specific research, but as I said, the MOST competitive people will have field-specific research.
My suggestion: find research projects in the most competitive field you think you are interested in. If that ends up being the field to which you apply, great. If not, you can still get a higher volume of research/pubs than people who didn't start til later if you start early, and you can always try to find more "last-minute" field-related stuff in third year once you really know what you want to do (or earlier).
I appreciate the insight. I'm meeting with some faculty in the near future and maybe I'll have a clearer picture then.
triggered
lol
D
deleted245139
It's never bad to engage research, interest groups, extracurricular stuff early.... And excellent to have a plan -
That said, the best thing you can do through this journey is to know yourself. If you find the pace of classes too intense early on, pump the breaks on the other stuff and get realigned. The research and stuff won't matter much with poor clinical performance and a low Step.
Success is medical school comes with having a plan, and being adaptable.
Good luck!
That said, the best thing you can do through this journey is to know yourself. If you find the pace of classes too intense early on, pump the breaks on the other stuff and get realigned. The research and stuff won't matter much with poor clinical performance and a low Step.
Success is medical school comes with having a plan, and being adaptable.
Good luck!