-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
.
Started by hopefuldawkter
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
It may have as much to do with the reviewer as the applicant (time on their hands...).
What exactly do you mean by that?
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It’s not necessarily that the app is stellar, but just that the reviewer is quick and has gotten through a lot of apps. You would have received an II regardless
Early interviews may have been screened by those who had more time on their hands than usual.
It may have less to do with the candidate than the evaluator.
You sure type fast, whippersnapper.
Just through observation here on SDN
Some schools will review very high stat, minority, veteran, or overcame a hardship students faster / earlier / out of order. But it seems most schools especially in the T20 review apps chronologically based on completed submission date.
Some schools will review very high stat, minority, veteran, or overcame a hardship students faster / earlier / out of order. But it seems most schools especially in the T20 review apps chronologically based on completed submission date.
On my phone nonetheless
Well it wouldn’t be early now anyway so you probs don’t have to worry about it
D
deleted972488
Not necessarily. Stanford just started sending them out recently, Emory hasn’t sent any out yet, and I’m sure there are other examples.
Congrats! Racking up those airline bonus miles!
Of course, but I am pretty sure he meant that we are now entering the heart of the interview season, so while some schools (like the two you mentioned) might not have been the first out of the gate, any IIs from September on would not really be considered "early" given that apps opened 3 months ago.
