-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
You are correct. First co-authors.So my name is first on the publication, as a first author, and the name of another contributor is right after mine with an * denoting that we contributed equally. I saw some threads here saying there can only be 1 first author, but this has to mean we're first co-authors right? Ik it doesn't matter but I don't want to present it inaccurately
diasterdream
Full Member
Almost no difference or is the difference?And being first author makes almost difference in admissions
Sorry this is nitpicky.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I mentioned on my primary that I had submitted a manuscript. I know this doesn't carry the same weight as a publication, but is it still wise that I mentioned it?Almost NO difference
Either you have a pub or not
It won't hurt, but it won't help. You could submit your shopping list written in crayon on a brown paper bag to Nature and it's still "Manuscript submitted"I mentioned on my primary that I had submitted a manuscript. I know this doesn't carry the same weight as a publication, but is it still wise that I mentioned it?
This is not a universal opinion. It may be med school dependent, as all schools don't give the same weight to research involvement.Almost NO difference
Either you have a pub or not
The last author may also have invested a significant amount of effort, but the first author is generally more involved in the creative process, and has a better overall view of the project. These levels of involvement tend to provide more luster to the research endeavor.it doesn't totally make sense in terms of effort.
I did put it in context ha. I wasn't just like, "yo, I sent in a random manuscript." It's the research project I've been working on for a while and it was accepted to a conference...bahumbug 🙁It won't hurt, but it won't help. You could submit your shopping list written in crayon on a brown paper bag to Nature and it's still "Manuscript submitted"