.

[deleted943850]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

.

 

[Engrailed]

An abstract that was published in a national conference was published in The FASEB Journal Supplemental Issue with abstract, methods, results, conclusion, etc. But this doesn't show up on pubmed...?

Sometimes it takes a few weeks for pubmed to process it/show it.

 

[Engrailed]

It has been seven months, and I'm a little confused about if a journal publishes abstracts from a conference like this in their supplemental issue, they're not considered a publication.

It’s definitely some sort of publication...but maybe it’s not something that would be caught by pubmed. In any case, the abstract is still awesome! Be sure to list it on AMCAS etc

 

[Ben2019]

It’s more like a poster than publication. And I assume it will not be in pubmed, but pubmed central.

 

[deleted972488]

An abstract submitted to a conference does not go through the rigorous peer-review process that journal articles go through. It is not a publication. It is a conference abstract.

 

[Ben2019]

Are you sure? It's published online in this issue: https://www.fasebj.org/toc/fasebj/33/1_supplement

I also do not see it on PMC

I am pretty sure about it. I have an abstract in the similar situation. It was published as supplement in schizophrenia bulletin last year. It is never included in pubmed and I can see it in PMC. Probably you will have to wait for a while until yours is shown in PMC. And EmbryonalCarcinoma is right. Without peer-review, strictly speaking, you cannot call it a publication. Even a review paper will need to be peer-reviewed.

 

[Ben2019]

so how did you list that in your AMCAS? Since I assume the conference name was also different?

I did not specifically list it as both my publication and conference sections are full with other things. I just briefly mentioned it in the secondary under "anything else they should know" as the manuscript is now under review with another journal.

 

[JoaoMoutinho]

An abstract submitted to a conference does not go through the rigorous peer-review process that journal articles go through. It is not a publication. It is a conference abstract.

ERAS (residency application service) apparently disagrees, but this is correct.

 

[Lawpy]

Publications = peer reviewed journal articles.

 

[Ben2019]

So a correct way to list this would be
1) Abstract accepted. Conference name. "Title". Authors
2) Abstract published(or listed? accepted?). Journal name. "Title." Authors

Or just the first one?

I don’t think it matters too much either way.