-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
.
Started by LonelyBoi
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Hard to know. If you're serious about going to this school, letting them know about your desire to stay in-state may lead to getting off the waitlist early. Obviously, only do this if you would pick this school over your other options.I have been accepted to a couple of medical schools so far, but one of my in-state medical schools has put me on the waitlist, which was surprising. My stats are considerably above the 90th percentile at this school, and they invited me for an early interview. The school has significant waitlist movement, so there still remains a possibility I may be accepted at the end of the day. But considering my stats are high, and I have been accepted to schools ranked higher, did I possibly just bomb the interview at the school? I thought the interview went well, and the interviewer complemented my interviewing skills, so I'm trying to understand where things went south.
Assuming everything went as great as you say, the answer I imagine the local adcoms giving is "yield protection." The school knows you're great, and that other, higher-ranked schools are likely to accept you. Why give you an A when you'll probably just dump it when this inevitably happens (or worse, when April hits)? That being said, if you sent a letter explaining your enduring interest they might be happy to extend one.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
ianturner0429
Full Member
I have been accepted to a couple of medical schools so far, but one of my in-state medical schools has put me on the waitlist, which was surprising. My stats are considerably above the 90th percentile at this school, and they invited me for an early interview. The school has significant waitlist movement, so there still remains a possibility I may be accepted at the end of the day. But considering my stats are high, and I have been accepted to schools ranked higher, did I possibly just bomb the interview at the school? I thought the interview went well, and the interviewer complemented my interviewing skills, so I'm trying to understand where things went south.
There could be many things. Perhaps their mission doesn’t fit well with yours. Perhaps you bombed the interview despite an interviewer telling you otherwise. If you would absolutely attend this school, it is appropriate to send a letter of intent.
Have seen same issue with the state school but with issuing an II, despite excellent success with T20/higher rated schools. In Wedgedog's school list recommendations, state school was always included implying no yield protection and access / shot for the in-state tuition. Pretty suprising as they are quite far along the interview process and have rolling admissing that have begun.
Don’t worry about it. I have blanketed most of T10 interviews but my state school won’t even invite me.I have been accepted to a couple of medical schools so far, but one of my in-state medical schools has put me on the waitlist, which was surprising. My stats are considerably above the 90th percentile at this school, and they invited me for an early interview. The school has significant waitlist movement, so there still remains a possibility I may be accepted at the end of the day. But considering my stats are high, and I have been accepted to schools ranked higher, did I possibly just bomb the interview at the school? I thought the interview went well, and the interviewer complemented my interviewing skills, so I'm trying to understand where things went south.
Schools will say that they don't yield protect but when they have a limited supply of interviewers/dates for interviews and applicants who will drop them for a full-ride (or even a partial ride) at a top school, they are going to be judicious in making interview invites or risk having empty seats at the end of the cycle.
@LonelyBoi a waitlist after interview may mean that the school is waiting for you to signal that you are willing to beg... They may want to avoid losing you late in the game when one of the other schools makes you a financial aid offer that puts that school's cost close to your state school's cost of attendance.
@LonelyBoi a waitlist after interview may mean that the school is waiting for you to signal that you are willing to beg... They may want to avoid losing you late in the game when one of the other schools makes you a financial aid offer that puts that school's cost close to your state school's cost of attendance.
Don't take it personally
Assuming everything went as great as you say, the answer I imagine the local adcoms giving is "yield protection." The school knows you're great, and that other, higher-ranked schools are likely to accept you. Why give you an A when you'll probably just dump it when this inevitably happens (or worse, when April hits)? That being said, if you sent a letter explaining your enduring interest they might be happy to extend one.
Yield protection is more accurately described as resource management.
Once the cost of interviewing someone has been expended there is no value in waitlisting them.
If your theory were correct, the state school would never have interviewed OP.
State public schools are almost always cheaper than OOS. That's why they almost always interview very well qualified IS candidates.
Last edited:
Agree. Hence no II at my state school.Yield protection is more accurately described as resource management.
Once the cost of interviewing someone has been expended there is no value to waitlisting them.
If your theory were correct, the state school would never have interview OP.
State public schools are almost always cheaper than OOS. That's why they almost always interview very well qualified IS candidates.
D
deleted972488
State public schools are almost always cheaper than OOS. That's why they almost always interview very well qualified IS candidates.
Are you saying you’re not well qualified?Agree. Hence no II at my state school
Lol! Didn’t see that part! Maybe I am not to them! They are already starting to accept!Are you saying you’re not well qualified?
D
deleted972488
Well, you will likely have other choices. 🙂Lol! Didn’t see that part! Maybe I am not to them! They are already starting to accept!
Yield protection is more accurately described as resource management.
Once the cost of interviewing someone has been expended there is no value to waitlisting them.
If your theory were correct, the state school would never have interviewed OP.
State public schools are almost always cheaper than OOS. That's why they almost always interview very well qualified IS candidates.
Could the school not both have sustained interest in OP but choose to waitlist them, hoping for a letter of interest to ensure the A wouldn't go to waste? State school aid doesn't compete with what some of the T20's are starting to provide, so it'd be right for the school to assume, lacking a love letter, that it's not at the top of OP's list. But maybe it's silly to expect an adcom to "game" a particular applicant like that?
No one invests the cost of an interview with the intent of waitlisting. It makes no economic sense.Could the school not both have sustained interest in OP but choose to waitlist them, hoping for a letter of interest to ensure the A wouldn't go to waste? State school aid doesn't compete with what some of the T20's are starting to provide, so it'd be right for the school to assume, lacking a love letter, that it's not at the top of OP's list. But maybe it's silly to expect an adcom to "game" a particular applicant like that?
No one with any sense believes LOI's.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
No one invests the cost of an interview with the intent of waitlisting. It makes no economic sense.
No one with any sense believes LOI's.
Any point in sending an LOI then if the school will re-review my application periodically (every two weeks according to the email)
"Love letters" before April 30 are only indicated if the school is goofy enough to request them.Any point in sending an LOI then if the school will re-review my application periodically (every two weeks according to the email)
“How are LOIs worthless? Do they just hold no weight whatsoever/not get read usually?”Any point in sending an LOI then if the school will re-review my application periodically (every two weeks according to the email)
How would you interpret a nonbinding promise from a desperate applicant?
Here’s one Adcom member’s thoughts on the matter:
“We only invite amazing students to interview. It is quite unlikely that further good deeds or achievements will have an effect since only the students who have already wowed us are interviewed.”
From the wise Med Ed: [What med schools…] accept and desire are two different things. My institution, for instance, will accept practically anything a given applicant wants to forward along, but only rarely do we consider it a worthwhile addition to the package.
And yes, some of us have gotten a little jaded about LOI's. I could fill a barrel with all the post-interview correspondence I have received that has not translated into a single matriculant. This has all gotten mighty complicated and burdensome for what is essentially a zero sum game.
It's generally not burdensome for an applicant to upload something to the portal, and once in a great while it does tip us off with some useful info. I can think of one individual who had a stellar application, like Harvard/Yale/Stanford-worthy, and a superb interview, who sent us several updates and a LOI. We were somewhat perplexed by this person's tenacious interest in our program. Turns out there were family/geographical reasons behind the whole thing, the applicant just never felt comfortable directly playing that card.
When it comes down to waitlist time I will scan through what folks have uploaded post-interview. The vast majority of times it has no impact. Occasionally I have seen it hurt people's chances. Come to think of it, in my experience this is probably more likely, than such correspondence having a positive impact.
See the following for classic examples of why most Admissions deans treat these as lies.
https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/loi-and-interviews.1252832/#post-18849958
I told a school I'd go if accepted, now not so sure
Hi All, So earlier this year I was waitlisted at a school that was my undoubted first choice. My boyfriend (we are applying together) was accepted there a month or so ago, and so we decided that we'd send the admissions staff a letter, basically saying "If you accept Not A Troll, we will both...
And if you still don’t believe me, read these:
HomeSkool's Guide to Letters of Intent
Second letter of intent? Help!
So I got an interview to a school back in January and was waitlisted in February. I loved the school and sent a letter of intent because of all the schools I had interviewed at, it was definitely my first choice. BUT, then I received an II from my absolute favorite school that was a reach and I...
forums.studentdoctor.net
The same thing happened to me with the school in my hometown. I ended up going to another school in the end.
I’ll just wait it out until April where I will get FA package offers from my accepted schools before I initiate action
Is that the earliest (april 30) school can send out financial aid packages? or can they do it anytime after fasfa and acceptance?
The schools Wayne state just in case anyone was wondering
based off the SDN specific thread, seems like a lot of waitlists at wayne were given out... including me rip