-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
.
Started by biostats1092
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
you have graded preclinical and p/f clinical? Never heard such a thing.
Are you at a USMD?That is the case with my school
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I don’t think anyone cares about your gpa. It’s all about ranking if your school does that. Never mind, I just realized that you said your clinical is h/p/f. So it’s not p/f.US MD/DO. Will not get anymore specific.
Most schools are p/f preclinical and h/p/f clinical with internal rankings.What are typical grading systems now? I'm curious, because this is how my school does it and I never knew it to be too different from that of other med schools.... I suspect a lot of med schools are H/P/F the whole 4 years?
For PhD, why would they care about your preclinical? PhD is all about research.Hmm... Even for internal/external independent PhD applications? Do you have any insight into this?
Bottom line, it’s impossible for us to say what a “good” GPA is out of context. A more meaningful assessment is probably your class rank/quartile, as that incorporates what percentage of students get what grades.
Since this is an internal PhD application they will probably know how your GPA stacks up against other students at your school. It is also impossible for us to speculate how importantly that would be weighed against other factors, such as your research acumen. Since these internal physician scientist program transfers are pretty uncommon it’s hard for us to guess what they really care about in deciding such applications
Since this is an internal PhD application they will probably know how your GPA stacks up against other students at your school. It is also impossible for us to speculate how importantly that would be weighed against other factors, such as your research acumen. Since these internal physician scientist program transfers are pretty uncommon it’s hard for us to guess what they really care about in deciding such applications
Your student dean(s) should know. You should have a conversation with them.
I've always felt that if my own DO students were at a 3.0+ in preclinicals, then it's OK for then to take Step I. <3.0? take COMLEX only. So far, I'd say that you're doing fine!I'm predicting I'll finish off my preclinical years with a 3.3-3.5 range GPA (current M2) by spring. Then, we have the P/F curriculum for the last two years.
My school has a grading scale of letter grades up to 4.0 for the first 2 years, then it's H/P/F for the last two.
What is considered to be a good GPA in medical school? I tried hard, but I couldn't get straight A's in preclinicals. On an aside, I'm also trying for an internal transfer into the MD/DOPhD program at my medical school, so I am not sure what they make of my low preclinical GPA. In UG, I had >3.9, close to 4.0.
Why do you want to do the PhD? The PhD programs affiliated with DO programs are pretty generic so not sure what you gain from the 4-5 extra years unless you legit want to be a professor who does mainly research. My DO school had a PhD program students could apply into and as long as you were a decent med student and had a faculty member that you were wanting to work with it was pretty much an automatic acceptance. It wasn't the same process as people applying from outside to the PhD program.
No one cares about your preclinical GPA. This isn't undergrad, a 3.3 GPA isn't low. That's about what mine was and residency programs didn't give a rats fart, it was all about my board scores, research output and LOR's.
No one cares about your preclinical GPA. This isn't undergrad, a 3.3 GPA isn't low. That's about what mine was and residency programs didn't give a rats fart, it was all about my board scores, research output and LOR's.
It’s not really what you were asking, but I agree with @DOVinciRobot that you should be thoughtful about the why for your PhD. Do not do a PhD unless you seriously want to pursue an academic career with significant research output, or some other specialized nonclinical position where your research expertise will help you. Occasionally I see students who want a PhD because they think that it’ll help them stand out for a competitive residency and I think that is a bad idea—you can get more than enough research from a single research year