- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 0
What do you think about this technique. Pretty cool.
http://www.sswhiteburs.com/clinical_perkins.html
http://www.sswhiteburs.com/clinical_perkins.html
gumgardener2009 said:What do you think about this technique. Pretty cool.
http://www.sswhiteburs.com/clinical_perkins.html
CJWolf said:From what i've read there are mixed reviews of the peeling enamel method. I guess it would work for some but i think most prefer the more conventional method.
ItsGavinC said:I don't know much about the technique, but it seems that those burs are all the rage on DentalTown.
ItsGavinC said:I don't know much about the technique, but it seems that those burs are all the rage on DentalTown.
toofache32 said:How can we know anything about the "technique"? This link doesn't tell us anything but "buy my secrets!" It sounds like one of those gimicks on TV at 2am where they are selling their "secrets" to making money...then they just sell you a job listing from the classifieds.
To many this will seem completely iconoclastic but topical is absolutely one of the most useless products dentists have ever wasted their time with.
Once the patient is seated and you have said, "Hello Mr. Smith how are you doing today?" you give anesthesia. Don't use topical. Topical doesn't do anything. Wait a minute. Let me take that back. It does do something. It makes the patient salivate, choke and gag, come up out of the chair, beg for suction and take up precious time. And then you have to come up with some cute response like, "It's supposed to taste like pina colada but they haven't quite perfected it yet". Or you make some other weak apology for the poor taste. Then you have to wait around for it take effect. Then when it does take effect your patient may still feel pain. It's not the initial needle stick that hurts patients, it's the pressure of the injection that hurts. Topical does create a sensation of numbness superficially but that's about it. You may think that topical works well because you give a buccal infiltration after using topical and the patient didn't feel anything. They wouldn't have felt anything anyway. For mandibular blocks, topical is particularly ridiculous. The hypodermic needle passes through at least twenty millimeters of tissue that topical could never penetrate.
toofache32 said:How can we know anything about the "technique"? This link doesn't tell us anything but "buy my secrets!" It sounds like one of those gimicks on TV at 2am where they are selling their "secrets" to making money...then they just sell you a job listing from the classifieds.
Is Scott Perkins trying to sell burs? I don't know. Why don't you email him? As I said before, there is more info on it at the SS White site. For those who like things handed to them here's the link: http://www.sswhiteburs.com/clinical_perkins2.htmlItsGavinC said:Good call.
Is Scott Perkins trying to sell burs? I don't know. Why don't you email him? As I said before, there is more info on it at the SS White site. For those who like things handed to them here's the link: http://www.sswhiteburs.com/clinical_perkins2.html
I did sell burs under the Samurai Precision Bur name. I stopped selling them a few years ago.
The bur has succeeded well and is sold under many names. In fact, it dominates the market in tungsten carbide steel burs these days. It is one heck of a bur.
I may start selling it again soon.
SSWhite no longer has my article, "The Enamel Peel Technique" on their website. I'll try to find an electronic version and post it here.
Meanwhile, here's the short version:
Spear the bur into the tooth entering from the buccal side and MB point angle aiming for the occlusal DEJ sinking the bur to the midline. Draw the bur back to the DB corner. Remove the bur from the tooth. Spear the bur from the lingual side and ML point angle aiming for the occlusal DEJ to the midline and draw it back to the DL corner. Since you are underneath the enamel, most of the bur is cutting through soft dentin increasing the speed of the cut.
The occlusal enamel is lifted off the tooth.
Next, spear the tooth from an occlusal direction into the DEJ towards the gingival margin. Travel counter-clockwise peeling the axial enamel off the tooth.
Enamel is now gone from the tooth.
Refine the "roughed in" prep with a medium chamfer diamond.
The Good: Minimal trauma to tooth, patient and dentist. Less treatment time.
The Bad: Requires the use of 2 burs and switching burs during the procedure.
I used the SSWhite bur in the beginning. In fact, I popularized that bur when i wrote "The 15 Minute Crown Procedure". I also sold thousands of "The 15 Minute Crown Procedure" Video, which taught the technique. Probably every dentist that watched that video bought Great White burs from SSWhite. I can't count the number of dentists who would approach me and tell me the best thing they learned in the video was the use of the GW#2 bur. I had no financial interest in SSWhite.
These days the GW2 has been superceded in speed and longevity by burs like the Samurai.
Nothing wrong with selling things. We all do it. Every time you do a case presentation, you are selling something. There is something wrong with being dishonest when selling.
Selling something to a patient or another dentist can be a good thing if it has value, particularly if the value is greater than the money you are asking for it.
The guy makes some good points, especially this one:
I hate topical. When I train hygienists to give injections I try to impart my bias to them as well. It helps that we don't carry topical in our clinic.
I also like the quote about not grinding wood to shape, but, rather, cutting it to shape. Makes sense.
The topical that you can buy from Patterson like Hurricane is about useless. Have your pharmacist compound some tricane blue (also known as Profound) for you and you will forever change the way that you think about topical
I read a thread on DT about tricane blue and how some dentists were getting pulpal anesthesia with it. Is this true?
Hammer, do you use it and if so in what applications?