- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 0
Just finished the DAT! I think I made out pretty well
PAT 23 96.4
QR 24 99.0
RC 21 76.7
Bio 21 92.3
GC 21 87.0
OC 20 79.9
TS 21 91.6
AA 21 93.4
Not too thrilled about OC and RC, but I think they're acceptable, ie. not worth retaking for the hopes of improvement. Tell me what you think 🙂
Here's my breakdown of each section:
Bio:
Bio wasn't too bad. I found the questions to be pretty straightforward. There were some random questions though. I used DAT destroyer (2009) textbooks, Cliff's AP bio (3rd ed). I would highly recommend each of these for bio. Basically, I read through Cliff's as a foundation, then answered the questions from Destroyer. From there, I got an idea of which topics I needed more in depth review in (pretty much all of them at that point) and read chapters from Campbell. I also looked through Kaplans blue book, but I found the information to be rather diluted, so I didn't really use it.
GC:
I started out with the ACS test book to first get into chem (after 2 years, I had forgotten a lot of concepts). I would highly recommend this. I learn better through self-teaching, this was definitely really good for that. Basically for each topic, it gives you an array of practice questions with very detailed answers (a great way to learn), then a bunch of practice questions. The only thing is the answers to the practice questions don't have solutions, so you kind of have to figure out yourself why you got them wrong (although this is arguably better).
I followed up with the DAT destroyer, which was really helpful also.
OC:
This was my weakest section, I was never too good at orgo, so I was relatively happy with this score. I probably could have studied more though. I prepared the same way as I did with GC; ACS, then Destroyer. Again, ACS is great for this section, as is Destroyer.
PAT:
I didn't really study for this section, aside from taking practice exams (topscore, scores below). I'm pretty good at this section anyway. I was kind of crunched for time, so my strategy was to spend more time on the sciences, so I didn't bother with CDP or anything like that.
RC:
Again, didn't use any sources to study, just the practice exams. If I had more time I probably would have done something like CDR to bring up my score. I hated this section, haha
QR:
Haha, I spent the least amount of time on this section. I didn't even learn trig, didn't do the math section in destroyer, and when taking the topscore exams, for 2 of them I gave up early and just ended the test (lazy, I know😳). I don't even consider myself good at math. Needless to say, I was surprised that this was my best section.
TOP SCORE:
1 2 3
BIO 17 16 17
GC 19 19 19
OC 15 17 18
PAT 18 21 22
RC 19 22 18
QR 16 12* 1*
*abandoned either during QR section, or right after RC😴
Overall, I think I could have studied more, but when does anyone ever feel like the studied enough for this epic test?
Tell me what you think, am I competetive with a 3.7 (sci and total) gpa?
PAT 23 96.4
QR 24 99.0
RC 21 76.7
Bio 21 92.3
GC 21 87.0
OC 20 79.9
TS 21 91.6
AA 21 93.4
Not too thrilled about OC and RC, but I think they're acceptable, ie. not worth retaking for the hopes of improvement. Tell me what you think 🙂
Here's my breakdown of each section:
Bio:
Bio wasn't too bad. I found the questions to be pretty straightforward. There were some random questions though. I used DAT destroyer (2009) textbooks, Cliff's AP bio (3rd ed). I would highly recommend each of these for bio. Basically, I read through Cliff's as a foundation, then answered the questions from Destroyer. From there, I got an idea of which topics I needed more in depth review in (pretty much all of them at that point) and read chapters from Campbell. I also looked through Kaplans blue book, but I found the information to be rather diluted, so I didn't really use it.
GC:
I started out with the ACS test book to first get into chem (after 2 years, I had forgotten a lot of concepts). I would highly recommend this. I learn better through self-teaching, this was definitely really good for that. Basically for each topic, it gives you an array of practice questions with very detailed answers (a great way to learn), then a bunch of practice questions. The only thing is the answers to the practice questions don't have solutions, so you kind of have to figure out yourself why you got them wrong (although this is arguably better).
I followed up with the DAT destroyer, which was really helpful also.
OC:
This was my weakest section, I was never too good at orgo, so I was relatively happy with this score. I probably could have studied more though. I prepared the same way as I did with GC; ACS, then Destroyer. Again, ACS is great for this section, as is Destroyer.
PAT:
I didn't really study for this section, aside from taking practice exams (topscore, scores below). I'm pretty good at this section anyway. I was kind of crunched for time, so my strategy was to spend more time on the sciences, so I didn't bother with CDP or anything like that.
RC:
Again, didn't use any sources to study, just the practice exams. If I had more time I probably would have done something like CDR to bring up my score. I hated this section, haha
QR:
Haha, I spent the least amount of time on this section. I didn't even learn trig, didn't do the math section in destroyer, and when taking the topscore exams, for 2 of them I gave up early and just ended the test (lazy, I know😳). I don't even consider myself good at math. Needless to say, I was surprised that this was my best section.
TOP SCORE:
1 2 3
BIO 17 16 17
GC 19 19 19
OC 15 17 18
PAT 18 21 22
RC 19 22 18
QR 16 12* 1*
*abandoned either during QR section, or right after RC😴
Overall, I think I could have studied more, but when does anyone ever feel like the studied enough for this epic test?
Tell me what you think, am I competetive with a 3.7 (sci and total) gpa?