2 weeks enough time for full lengths?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

jigga5

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
97
Reaction score
6
Hey guys, so unfortunately I have had a few things come up and delay my studying and I am behind at this point. I was doing a modified SN2'ed schedule (minus the EK 1001) and if I continue to follow it I will not be done content review until Aug 11. Problem is that I write on Aug 28th and that leaves me with 17 days for full lengths. I have not taken any full lengths up to this point so I have no idea where I stand, I have only been doing the Berkeley passages (most chapters between 60-70% ; a couple ~80%).

Doubling up on the chapters might be hard since I am a bit rusty on these topics considering I took them like 4 years ago (Don't want to rush topics). So is 17 days enough for full lengths? Or would it be better to ditch Berkeley review for the sake of time and maybe switch to something less dense (maybe TPR? not sure if it its much lighter in terms of content) in order to save more time for full lengths? I already have the TPR books but I have not cracked them as I have been using Berkeley this whole time.

Finally, I am aiming for anything above 30+ and I would be ecstatic with a 31 (10,11, 10) lol. Any advice is appreciated, thank you!
 
I mean obviously the more time u have for full lengths the better. But it is also very important u finish ur base content review without which u won't know the material

So I suggest finish content as quick as u can no matter what and then start the fls. U can maybe even review Em the same day u take Em. Or do added passages that same day in order to conserve some days. Im also following SN2 and will only have 22 days for full lengths. U gotta do what u gotta do. But I think that is plenty of time.

Gl
 
I mean obviously the more time u have for full lengths the better. But it is also very important u finish ur base content review without which u won't know the material

So I suggest finish content as quick as u can no matter what and then start the fls. U can maybe even review Em the same day u take Em. Or do added passages that same day in order to conserve some days. Im also following SN2 and will only have 22 days for full lengths. U gotta do what u gotta do. But I think that is plenty of time.

Gl

thanks, good luck to you as well!
 
Hey guys, so unfortunately I have had a few things come up and delay my studying and I am behind at this point. I was doing a modified SN2'ed schedule (minus the EK 1001) and if I continue to follow it I will not be done content review until Aug 11. Problem is that I write on Aug 28th and that leaves me with 17 days for full lengths. I have not taken any full lengths up to this point so I have no idea where I stand, I have only been doing the Berkeley passages (most chapters between 60-70% ; a couple ~80%).

Doubling up on the chapters might be hard since I am a bit rusty on these topics considering I took them like 4 years ago (Don't want to rush topics). So is 17 days enough for full lengths? Or would it be better to ditch Berkeley review for the sake of time and maybe switch to something less dense (maybe TPR? not sure if it its much lighter in terms of content) in order to save more time for full lengths? I already have the TPR books but I have not cracked them as I have been using Berkeley this whole time.

Finally, I am aiming for anything above 30+ and I would be ecstatic with a 31 (10,11, 10) lol. Any advice is appreciated, thank you!

If you're doing that well on TBR, you're in good shape. Just take FL's and review the test immediately after the exam. I bet you could fit in 8-10 without too much burnout. Good luck.
 
Sn2 seems to recommend 4 weeks to FL's which should be 3 days per FL. Day 1 - take FL, Day 2 - review FL + additional content review, Day 3 - content review. If you have already finished your content review then I think it should be okay for you to cross out day 3 and just do an FL every two days.... But take this with a grain of salt because I am not an MCAT expert like some ppl on this forum.
 
Top