- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 3,102
- Reaction score
- 14
http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/2008/mcatgpa-grid-3yrs-app-accpt.htm
Does that sound weird to anyone else?
Does that sound weird to anyone else?
The weirdest thing to me is that there were people with an MCAT score between 5 and 14 who got in.
That's unbelievable.
http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/2008/mcatgpa-grid-3yrs-app-accpt.htm
Does that sound weird to anyone else?
Thats a great table.
Someone got in with a 2.60-2.79 and a 5-14. I hope they don't become a doctor.
Somone else got rejected with a 39-45 and a 3.80-4.00. In fact, 64 applicants did.
I'm sure that particular applicant had an amazing background and extenuating circumstances, so stop being so quick to judge and jumping to conclusions, unless you're this guy:
![]()
I'm sure that particular applicant had an amazing background and extenuating circumstances, so stop being so quick to judge and jumping to conclusions, unless you're this guy:
![]()
And the converse is also true : a GPA of 3.2-3.39 and an MCAT score of 36-38 nets you a 61% chance of acceptance.
It's hard to say for sure, but it actually seems as those MCAT is a little more important than GPA. I noticed that the percentages for people with a high MCAT + lower GPA seemed to be better than for the opposite.
Here's the part that is interesting : I was frantic I wouldn't get in with a 3.4 and a 36. Yet, according to this chart, I had a 76% chance.
Well, I dearly wished I had the 'typical' stats of a successful applicant, which are 3.6 and a 31 MCAT. Yet, had I scored those numbers, I would have had a 76.8% chance.
And, I really wished I had a 3.8 GPA along with my 36 MCAT. My chances would have 'jumped' to 92%. Well, ok, that is a big difference.
Moral of the story : it looks like you can make up for a GPA that is a little on the low side with a high enough MCAT.
I believe that people who are accepted to BA/MD programs are counted in this table as applicants. Some of those programs do not require the MCAT, and so some people take them just for fun and to mess with curves and whatnot. Thats how they get in with scores like 5-18.
I'm sure that particular applicant had an amazing background and extenuating circumstances, so stop being so quick to judge and jumping to conclusions, unless you're this guy:
![]()
That table is not on their general statistics page. How did you find it?http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/2008/mcatgpa-grid-3yrs-app-accpt.htm
Does that sound weird to anyone else?
Someone got in with a 2.60-2.79 and a 5-14. I hope they don't become a doctor.
The weirdest thing to me is that there were people with an MCAT score between 5 and 14 who got in.
That's unbelievable.
looking at this table reminded me of when i first learned about the (electronegativity, size, ionization energy, etc.) trends on the periodic table. based on this framework, i think i'm somewhere around phosphorus.
That table is not on their general statistics page. How did you find it?
Who's that guy? The one in the basement form Office Space? Its not me.
Say what you will about these guys, but it takes balls of steel to apply to med school with a 5 on the MCAT.
I believe that people who are accepted to BA/MD programs are counted in this table as applicants. Some of those programs do not require the MCAT, and so some people take them just for fun and to mess with curves and whatnot. Thats how they get in with scores like 5-18.
Say what you will about these guys, but it takes balls of steel to apply to med school with a 5 on the MCAT.
Is a 5 even possible on the MCAT? what is theoretically the lowest score one can get on the mcat? i always thought standardized tests had a minimum, like the SAT minimum is 400 (old version) and 600 (new version)
I believe the minimum score for each section is a 1. Kinda makes you wonder what happened to those who scored a 3 or a 4, huh?
that makes sense. do some of those programs even require that the student take the MCAT, but they can do terrible on it ... (SLU's BA/MD program?), that would explain some ...
The weirdest thing to me is that there were people with an MCAT score between 5 and 14 who got in.
That's unbelievable.
Are you sure this table is really official?😎. I doubt my fellow SDners would endorse such a table. On SDN, having numbers below 35 and 3.8 means an auto-rejection....usually.
An even more interesting table is the one below:
http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/2008/mcatgpa-grid-3yrs-app-accpt-raceeth.htm
By the way, what is behind their combination of specific GPA's and MCAT scores? Does this mean that someone who has a 3.6 and a 33 is really not that different statistically from someone who had a 3.79 and a 35, provided every other criteria is similar of course?
Regardless of their wonderful life stories, extracurricular activities and URM status, I wouldn't want a doctor who got an 18 on his MCAT operating on me. If he saved handicapped children from a burning orphanage in Zimbabwe and wrote an essay on that, I don't care - he should be a fireman instead. I don't care what his GPA was. Maybe he went to some fairytale school where everyone gets A's and the teachers sing carols and blow bubbles up your butt.
The MCAT isn't like the SAT's, it actually does test you on what you learned in all your pre-req classes.
Or, as someone else suggested, they may be going to lectures in a building named after their father 🙂. Though I guess that falls under extenuating circumstances.
It is probably more of the combined BA/MD degrees and people just take the MCAT for fun (even though they don't have to).
The truth hurts huh. Must feel like you were looking through the wrong end of a kaleidoscope. Interesting.Regardless of their wonderful life stories, extracurricular activities and URM status, I wouldn't want a doctor who got an 18 on his MCAT operating on me. If he saved handicapped children from a burning orphanage in Zimbabwe and wrote an essay on that, I don't care - he should be a fireman instead. I don't care what his GPA was. Maybe he went to some fairytale school where everyone gets A's and the teachers sing carols and blow bubbles up your butt.
The MCAT isn't like the SAT's, it actually does test you on what you learned in all your pre-req classes. There are some basic strategies and tricks, but overall it's a fair test of your knowledge. You can't beat it just by enrolling in expensive prep courses and learning the "secrets". Prep courses are just super-accelerated lectures that pile the material on you in buckets. Assuming you're not someone who cracks under the pressure of a test (in which case maybe this isn't the profession for you), then the more you know, the better you'll do on the test.
Don't count much on it. In just a week, SDN will be back to "normal."Uhh ohh. SDN may explode. I'm glad this table was released. It should be stickied so we can see how skewed SDN is compared to real life.
Hmm, I don't think my undergrad has such a minimum...You're just not allowed to fail too many courses at once 🙄I don't even understand how you can be admitted to medical school with <2.0 GPA. The minimum at my ugrad was 2.0 to graduate, how are these people getting their undergrad degrees?
Funny stuff on that table. Technically, there was one person with an MCAT from 39-45 and a GPA below 2.4...
He or she got in...
And the success rate for someone with a below 2.4 and 39+ MCAT is 100%...
I can't believe my eyes, actually. I sort of thought that med school adcoms stopped 'counting' GPAs below 3.0, and started trashing applications...
That's still true, but evidently there is an exception to every rule...