berryfremont said:
"Out of curiosity... Those who got rejected via email, did you get interviews? Also, did you get the email a few weeks ago about them sending out acceptences soon after Dec. 1? Thanks." I like this question...i know it is hard to answer this after being denied acceptance, but, let us know...thanks.
Nope, I received the big goose-egg...nada, no interview. I received the rejection email last Tuesday, November 21. There was an attachment to the email which indicated the averages for those interviewed were: 3.5 overall, 3.46 science, 18.75 for the academic portion of the DAT, and 18.70 for the PAT. Also, there were 142 interviews this year.
Not sure if this helps, but I am close friends with 6 guys who have graduated from there over the past 5 years. Please do not shoot the messenger on this one...but according to them, there has been a push to increase the number of females in the class since the new dean took over 2 years ago. I am strictly throwing that out there as additional info. But, the class of 2008 had 40 males and 22 females. The class of 2009 has 31 males/31 females. Since historically, more males apply for spots than females, this can be "bad" if you are a guy, "good" if you are a gal. As I stated earlier, just passing on info I have heard "through the grapevine".
I do know that MCG only had 60 available spots this year instead of 62 as two other spots were filled based on some random cases from the previous application cycle.
Personally, I am anxious to see the final numbers this year as I am a dude
🙂 Maybe it will make me feel better for getting that wonderful rejection email.
In case you were wondering, my numbers were 3.4 overall, 3.8 science, 18/18. I am a non-traditional applicant as I received my BA about 15 years ago. No clue how I did not get interviewed.
Best of luck to you though! As I said in a previous post, very, very jealous of ya!