2007 USMLE Step I Experiences

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

missmod

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
I think I'll start the thread, since I just finished Step I today! Boy does it feel good to have it over with. In case you guys are wondering, my med school is on a different schedule, so we do basic sciences in 1.5 years, do one year of clerkships, and then take the boards.

So I started a 6 week study schedule (started after new years). The first five weeks, I studied for about 9-10 hours with a lot of breaks and took weekends off to either have fun or catch up/review. The last week I saved just for review and as many questions as I could fit into my 10 hour day. I have to say, this last week was the worst. Not in the no-sleep-cram-for-a-test kind of way, but in the huge-weight-on-your-shoulders kind of way.

Now for a breakdown of the subjects...

Biochem: There was not a lot of biochem on my exam. A few key enzyme deficiency ones (Lesch Nyhan, Maple Syrup Disease) but all of the questions were very obvious and did not require you to put much thought into it. Don't blow off porphyria and lead poisoning-- for some reason I got so many questions on that!

Molecular Bio: This was a big one! I think the NBME is moving away from the biochem towards questions on molecular bio. Many questions about DNA regulation, transcription, translation, bacterial plasmids, etc. Sometimes these questions look very scary -- they are always so long and use long names for molecules or restriction enzymes that you have never heard of. You need to get used to the question style and realize that what they are asking is very simple. The NBME forms have questions very similar to the molecular bio ones I saw on the exam.

Pharm: Another one I thought would be difficult but not. Big drugs you should know a lot about (like antihypertensives, drugs for hyperlipidemias, cardic drugs, etc.) However, I wouldn't worry too much about the side effects for every tiny drug -- especially the chemo and immunosupressant drugs that kept on tripping me up so much.

Micro/Immuno: I had not a single question on parasites! That huge chart of worms and helminths in First Aid had me worried for a while, but it was not a big part of my exam. If anything, just know the key phrases because if they do test you on it, it would be a really obvious scenario. Mostly bacterial processes and what you would use to treat them... or what was their mechanism of disease (i.e. endotoxn, exotoxin, etc.) Know immunology and cytokines well, as well as the functions of all the cells. Different immune deficiencies were all asked on my exam (there is one page in First Aid that sums them up very well).

Anatomy/Neuroanatomy: Always combined with a pathology question or an imagine. I had a few branchial plexus/lumbar plexus questions. Many questions would give you a clinical scenario, then ask you to identiy the artery/nerve/organ on a CT scan/MRI/angiogram/brain cross section. Again, I think Qbank does not help you much at all because there aren't that many images. All i can say is look through some atlases quickly as you are studying anatomy -- not Netters bc that won't help much, but books that will give you real radiographic images.

Physio: This was almost always combined with Pathology--they would ask the physiology behind some path process. I had so many questions where the question asked "what would be the levels of x, y, and z enzymes/hormones?", answer choices being "increased, decreased, etc"

Pathology: Not as detailed orientated as Kaplan. Very little histology related pathology -- most of the questions though, required you to make a diagnosis and then know something about the pathophys of the disease or the treatment of the disease. There were also a lot of images -- MANY more than Qbank's representation.

All in all, I think the test more manageable than Kaplan's Qbank. Don't let Qbank discourage you -- ! Doing the questions help you to learn, so if you were getting them all right then the questions are too easy and not really helping you much. I do remember many questions that I knew only because I got the question wrong on Kaplan's Qbank. Also, the NBME tests are VERY good and very representative of the real thing. They also help you get used to the wording of the Q's, which can be a LITTLE different from what Qbank is like. I did forms 2, 3, and 4 and I thought 2 and 3 were the best. A few images on those practice exams were repeated on my actual exam.

Goljan's book and lectures were great. He pointed out lots of things that wound up being on the exam and presents them in a way that really sticks. Also, his images are a great resource.

I've been lurking for a while and haven't really posted since applying to med school, but I have to say you guys have really helped me out during my boards studying. Good luck to everyone else getting ready to take this monster.
 
Oh don't get me wrong, there was a LOT of physiology(mostly integrated into either path or pharm) plus i read BRS phys for classes - all of which I forgot, heh. FA would get your thru the test just fine for the real thing though, honestly.
*EDit again. hah.* Renal/Cardio/Endo made up the bulk of the phys section. Cardio/renal and liver for the bulk of path.

Oh hey, I'm about to change some of the specific questions I listed in my earlier post, I don't want to get in trouble - would you mind taking out where your post has quoted my other post? Thanks...
 
done..
thanks for the info...
a lot of people say patho..
but i think its physio thats the real deal ..
gl
enjoy
 
So please don't shoot me for this question:

I was wonderring if any of you who have already taken the tests and used usmleworld are willing to lend or sell their username and password for the usmleworld q bank. I ask coz i alredy bought kaplan, and seeing all the UW reviews am getting a bit edgy...

if i had a month i'd buy UW, but am only 2 weeks away from taking my test and i thought it might be worth doing a a few qsts from usmleworld w/o having to draw on my already overstretched bank account

please don't shoot

contact me directly plz americanpatriots9 at gmail dot com

yr in debt med student
*bows in reverance and gratitude to any who may care to share*
 
So please don't shoot me for this question:

I was wonderring if any of you who have already taken the tests and used usmleworld are willing to lend or sell their username and password for the usmleworld q bank. I ask coz i alredy bought kaplan, and seeing all the UW reviews am getting a bit edgy...

if i had a month i'd buy UW, but am only 2 weeks away from taking my test and i thought it might be worth doing a a few qsts from usmleworld w/o having to draw on my already overstretched bank account

please don't shoot

contact me directly plz americanpatriots9 at gmail dot com

yr in debt med student
*bows in reverance and gratitude to any who may care to share*
I have a friend taking Step 1 in a week. You have two weeks. He purchased USMLEWorld because he thinks it's worth it. If you want it, you really have to pay for it.
 
Study plan:

I had about 40 days to study. My approach was subject based, hitting the three big subjects -- path, micro, pharm -- early and late. The smaller subjects were sandwiched in between. (My original study schedule was pretty much what I posted below, but I ended up taking more time off than intended due to personal and family issues. Be sure you built in some flexibility into your schedule. Emergencies don't always wait for you to finish Step 1.)

A typical day begins around 9. I did 2 hours of UW, followed by 4-6 hours of studying. Some days I went longer, but I'd guess that on average, I studied around 6 hours a day total.

Day 1 and 2: Cursory reading of FA
Day 3-5: RR path
Day 6-7: Pharm Recall
Day 8: Rest
day 9-10: CMMRS
Day 11: Kaplan Immuno (useless) + FA immuno re-read
Day 12-13: RR biochem
Day 14: NBME form 4, break in the afternoon
Day 15-16: HY embryo + FA embryo
Day 17-18: HY anatomy + FA anatomy
Day 19: Webpath + FA pictures
Day 20-21: HY neuroanatomy
Day 22: HY behavioral sciences
Day 23: rest
Day 24: rest (didn't feel like studying)
Day 25-27: BRS physio
Day 28: NBME form 3
Day 29-32: RR path (skipped the first few "general principle chapters")
Day 33-34: FA pharm + pharm recall
Day 35-36: Lange's 40 pages bug review + FA microbio
Day 37-38: FA embryo/anatomy/neuro+behavioral sci
Day 39: RR biochem (just the chapters on metabolism)
Day 40: FA path-physio

Question Banks:

I finished 2200 questions on Q-bank before I began studying. After that, I did UW almost exclusively.

The Real thing:

Nothing that hasn't been said earlier. Be sure you pay attention not only to pathology, but also the physiology that underlies the diseases. My form had a lot of GU (ugh!), very little pharm, no brachial plexus or hand/foot anatomy (another ugh!), and strangely enough, a lot of thoracic arteries and lymphatic drainage. All this is to say that everyone will get a different test, so don't place all your eggs in one basket. That said, I'd say that biochem, behavioral sciences, neuroanatomy and immuno were the most high-yield "small" subjects.


Assorted Milestones:

Q-bank (finished before studying): started around mid-high 60, ended around high 70s to mid 80s. Cumulative average: 75.

UW: cumulative = 80%. Finished mid 80s, broke 90s a few times.

NBME form 4: 790

NBME form 3: 800

The real thing (despite what automan said about NBME overpredicting the real score): 266

Hope this helps.
 
ok...so i took my test today...

so i prepped for about 4.5 weeks

I took the Kaplan classes(intense prep) and used the following materials:

Kaplan notes
Qbank ( final avg 68%) 92% completed
UW (final avg 70%) 94% completed
USMLERX ( final avg 78%) 60% completed
NBME 1-4 ill post this if im happy wit my score🙂


RR just for weak topics
BRS Path -excellent book
FA cases for Step 1 - i could remember SEVERAL Q's from this book!!!
and of course FA!!!====> the best book ever..

The night b4 my exam i went through pharm and the rapid review in the back of FA and that got me A LOT!! of questions on the exam. For the rapid review, i didnt just read it, i wrote down all the associations i could think of off the top of my head right next to it, and if i didnt know it i would look it up. 4 of the FA pictures showed up on my exam.

As far as the actual test...

Anatomy was pretty straight forward, i had like 5 median nerve questions in the first block alone

i thought that my test was heavily based on pharm, immuno and biochem, which for me turned out to be very good. The pharm was VERY straightforward. Immuno was a little tricky b/c they would show me the entire pathway and ask which step is inhibited. Micro was very straightforward. A lot of antibiotics on my exam. Virtully NO parasites on my exam.

Path and phys were integrated, again they were somewhat straightforward. some easy some hard, as expected.

Overall i thought the exam was FAIR.....i recognized a good portion of the material, I just hope i picked all of the right answers🙂

we shall see in about 3-4 weeks.....till then:scared:

got my score today..

230+

🙂
 
yeah, thats great.. but strange. Your UW and Qbank scores are more along the lines of your actual score and your NBMEs are a little low. Thats the reverse of how most people end up... But congrats! Any reason why that happened?
 
NBME 1-192
NBME 2- 192
NBME 4-209
NBME 3-214 3 days b4 test...

niiice improvement. and congrats on the solid score. 👍 did you walk out of there thinking you may have hit 230+, or that u did significantly better than the most recent nbme?
 
Study plan:

I had about 40 days to study. My approach was subject based, hitting the three big subjects -- path, micro, pharm -- early and late. The smaller subjects were sandwiched in between. (My original study schedule was pretty much what I posted below, but I ended up taking more time off than intended due to personal and family issues. Be sure you built in some flexibility into your schedule. Emergencies don't always wait for you to finish Step 1.)

A typical day begins around 9. I did 2 hours of UW, followed by 4-6 hours of studying. Some days I went longer, but I'd guess that on average, I studied around 6 hours a day total.

Day 1 and 2: Cursory reading of FA
Day 3-5: RR path
Day 6-7: Pharm Recall
Day 8: Rest
day 9-10: CMMRS
Day 11: Kaplan Immuno (useless) + FA immuno re-read
Day 12-13: RR biochem
Day 14: NBME form 4, break in the afternoon
Day 15-16: HY embryo + FA embryo
Day 17-18: HY anatomy + FA anatomy
Day 19: Webpath + FA pictures
Day 20-21: HY neuroanatomy
Day 22: HY behavioral sciences
Day 23: rest
Day 24: rest (didn't feel like studying)
Day 25-27: BRS physio
Day 28: NBME form 3
Day 29-32: RR path (skipped the first few "general principle chapters")
Day 33-34: FA pharm + pharm recall
Day 35-36: Lange's 40 pages bug review + FA microbio
Day 37-38: FA embryo/anatomy/neuro+behavioral sci
Day 39: RR biochem (just the chapters on metabolism)
Day 40: FA path-physio

Question Banks:

I finished 2200 questions on Q-bank before I began studying. After that, I did UW almost exclusively.

The Real thing:

Nothing that hasn't been said earlier. Be sure you pay attention not only to pathology, but also the physiology that underlies the diseases. My form had a lot of GU (ugh!), very little pharm, no brachial plexus or hand/foot anatomy (another ugh!), and strangely enough, a lot of thoracic arteries and lymphatic drainage. All this is to say that everyone will get a different test, so don't place all your eggs in one basket. That said, I'd say that biochem, behavioral sciences, neuroanatomy and immuno were the most high-yield "small" subjects.


Assorted Milestones:

Q-bank (finished before studying): started around mid-high 60, ended around high 70s to mid 80s. Cumulative average: 75.

UW: cumulative = 80%. Finished mid 80s, broke 90s a few times.

NBME form 4: 790

NBME form 3: 800

The real thing (despite what automan said about NBME overpredicting the real score): 266

Hope this helps.

Men!! You are something else. CONGRATS!!!!
 
Study plan:

I had about 40 days to study. My approach was subject based, hitting the three big subjects -- path, micro, pharm -- early and late. The smaller subjects were sandwiched in between. (My original study schedule was pretty much what I posted below, but I ended up taking more time off than intended due to personal and family issues. Be sure you built in some flexibility into your schedule. Emergencies don't always wait for you to finish Step 1.)

A typical day begins around 9. I did 2 hours of UW, followed by 4-6 hours of studying. Some days I went longer, but I'd guess that on average, I studied around 6 hours a day total.

Day 1 and 2: Cursory reading of FA
Day 3-5: RR path
Day 6-7: Pharm Recall
Day 8: Rest
day 9-10: CMMRS
Day 11: Kaplan Immuno (useless) + FA immuno re-read
Day 12-13: RR biochem
Day 14: NBME form 4, break in the afternoon
Day 15-16: HY embryo + FA embryo
Day 17-18: HY anatomy + FA anatomy
Day 19: Webpath + FA pictures
Day 20-21: HY neuroanatomy
Day 22: HY behavioral sciences
Day 23: rest
Day 24: rest (didn't feel like studying)
Day 25-27: BRS physio
Day 28: NBME form 3
Day 29-32: RR path (skipped the first few "general principle chapters")
Day 33-34: FA pharm + pharm recall
Day 35-36: Lange's 40 pages bug review + FA microbio
Day 37-38: FA embryo/anatomy/neuro+behavioral sci
Day 39: RR biochem (just the chapters on metabolism)
Day 40: FA path-physio

Question Banks:

I finished 2200 questions on Q-bank before I began studying. After that, I did UW almost exclusively.

The Real thing:

Nothing that hasn't been said earlier. Be sure you pay attention not only to pathology, but also the physiology that underlies the diseases. My form had a lot of GU (ugh!), very little pharm, no brachial plexus or hand/foot anatomy (another ugh!), and strangely enough, a lot of thoracic arteries and lymphatic drainage. All this is to say that everyone will get a different test, so don't place all your eggs in one basket. That said, I'd say that biochem, behavioral sciences, neuroanatomy and immuno were the most high-yield "small" subjects.


Assorted Milestones:

Q-bank (finished before studying): started around mid-high 60, ended around high 70s to mid 80s. Cumulative average: 75.

UW: cumulative = 80%. Finished mid 80s, broke 90s a few times.

NBME form 4: 790

NBME form 3: 800

The real thing (despite what automan said about NBME overpredicting the real score): 266

Hope this helps.
Holy SChnikees! Strong work, sir! 👍
 
Congrats to all of you who finished and done well.

I just finished my big *quiz* few days ago. I gotta say, i really feel like i failed. i know many people feel this way, but i truly think i bombed it. i had to blinded guess on about 10 questions w/o even reading the question due to time limit. I was hoping if you guys can help me answer few questions I have:

-If I did mark the answer and the time runs out, does that question get answered? I ask this because there is one last page after 50th question that says "end" (asking if you are sure you want to end this exam), which i didn't get to, but still filled in the bubble for the 50th question before time ran out. And I noticed that even after I fill in the answer it remains RED on the left margin, not BLUE.

-Anyone know if we can ONLY take the exam if we failed? or can we take it again if we barely passed?

-Does ALL scores get reported to the residency if we take it more than once?

please help, i'm desperate
 
Starting off at 65-70% for UW is pretty good. UW is tough, but it is the best approximation of the real exam. Even the interface is exactly the same. I had several questions on the real exam that were exact replicas of UW questions... they must be doing something slightly illegal over there but whatever they're doing, I'm grateful for it. I wouldn't use any other Qbank besides UW - Kaplan is a waste of time and money, considering it is much more expensive than UW and far, FAR LESS ACCURATE in terms of question type, material tested, etc.

Now that I've said all that, I recently took the exam and here are my thoughts.

My goal is >250, my scores have not come back yet.
NBME 1: 550 (in the middle of my study period)
NBME 2: 650
NBME 3: 680 (two nights before exam)

The exam day was pretty good. I felt relaxed. I had had trouble sleeping a little bit the night before, but the actual morning of the test, I felt positive and optimistic. The testing center was very nice, the ladies running it were cool, and I had no problems with my computer, although I did have problems with the guy next to me - he seemed to have some kind of Tourette's and would often sniffle, guffaw, clear his throat, etc, over and over again. Despite my ear muffs, I heard it all. Ah, well. Anyway, so my first block was insanely difficult. That almost took my confidence down, but mostly, I told myself that hey, I have done well on the NBME's, just answer the questions to the best of your ability and move on. The second block was also hard, but 3 and 4 were easy as hell. 5 and 6 were medium, probably due to fatigue, and 7 was a damn joke... really straightforward. Great way to end the day.

As for breakdown, I was disappointed to have hardly any cardio, micro, or renal on my exam. Tons of respiratory physio, which was kinda annoying, and tons of biochem - three questions alone on Maple Syrup Urine disease, two on PKU, a bunch of osteogenesis imperfecta. No musculoskeletal, from what I can recall. TONS of neuroanatomy, a couple of abdominal MRI's. The behavioral science questions were easy for the most part... the little micro I did have was standard stuff (strep, staph, nothing funky.) Honestly, I can hardly remember what else was on there... not much embryo, not much anatomy.

I already know I made two or three really, really stupid mistakes and am trying not to kick myself over that. I also know that I made some good guesses that ended up working out for me, so I am hoping those balance out the three really stupid mistakes I know I made. All I am hoping for is to do somewhere in the neighborhood of my NBME's.

How I studied...
I used FA as a skeleton and added info to it as I studied from other sources. Went in this order with these books:
Biochem: Lippincott's - I'm a huge fan. It's a lot to get through but great for metabolism, and I just like that book. For CMB, I used high-yield. I hate CMB.
Neuroanatomy: Made Ridiculously Simple and BRS to fill in holes
Micro: Mostly just FA and Microcards, which were more than enough. Associated Pharmcards for the antibiotics. Looked up stuff I'm weak on in CMMRS.
Immuno: High Yield, mostly. Some Kaplan and Abbas to clear up concepts I was weak in.
The rest of the material I integrated by organ system.
Embryo: High Yield and Kaplan
Anatomy: High Yield and BRS to fill in holes.
General path: Goljan, of course
General pharm: mostly First-Aid and Lippincott's Pharm to fill in holes
Physio: BRS
Path: Goljan RR and audio. If I could do it all over again, I would base my entire review around Goljan. He integrates so much micro, immuno, physiology and path into his lectures and book that you can really integrate the material in a huge way. Without Goljan I think I would have done much more poorly on this exam. I had BRS Path, but really didn't use it. I also had Pathcards, which had too many errors, but were okay since they had some images included. Good for rote stuff like lysosomal storage diseases and genetic diseases.
Pharm: just pharmcards. More than enough. Way more!
Behavioral: First Aid and BRS

I studied for about 6 weeks, 8-10 hours a day, or as much as I could tolerate until I felt like puking.


happy with score
 
Last edited:
I finished the exam yesterday. Im still just in a state of euphoria and aftershock. I shall post more about my experiences soon after I recover. Good luck to those remaining! 👍
 
score > 245/99

Congratulations dude. You did great. I have a quick question: Does the interface of the real exam look more like the NBME's or the 150 released questions? What was your score in the 150 released questions if you took it?
 
Congratulations dude. You did great. I have a quick question: Does the interface of the real exam look more like the NBME's or the 150 released questions? What was your score in the 150 released questions if you took it?

I was told the NBME exams feature the old interface and that the newly released 150 questions are using the current "FRED" interface.
 
Just got back 30 minutes ago! I want to write this while everything is still fresh.

Overall, I thought it was fine. VERY similar to the NBME practice tests (except that the questions are a little longer on the real thing) and similar to UW.

Biochem --- not much of this on my test at all. It kind of disappointed me because I put a lot of effort into learning it. There were maybe 5 questions total about reactions/intermediates. The remainder were questions associated with diseases --- 1 on PKU, 2 on vitamin deficiency that were obvious, 2 lysosomal storage disease questions, and a few on connective tissue disorders. That's it!

Micro --- lots of it! Bacteria were the majority, but I also had about 5 FUNKY parasite questions (including treatments)

Pharm --- straight-forward for the most part; I only used First Aid and it was sufficient. There was one kind of obscure question that I would not have gotten if it weren't for a really stupid mnemonic in First Aid! I laughed inside when I got that question. 🙂 Thank God I did not have a single anti-arrhythmic on my test. There were a lot of questions with graphs asking what would happen if you add drug X to drug Y, etc. --- the kind where you never really feel 100% confident about whether you got it right 😉

Immuno --- not much of this (maybe 2 or 3 cytokine questions, a few on immunodeficiency)

Molecular --- probably the trickiest questions on the exam, but I didn't leave thinking, "Oh my gosh, the molecular questions were terrible!" I was probably most uncertain about these, but I still felt very prepared using HY Molecular and Cell Bio (OLD version --- stay away from the new one)

Behavioral --- I used BRS Behavioral Science and I'm glad I did (there were some things that I would not have gotten from First Aid alone). I had 5 to 10 of those "what would you say as a doctor" type questions; other questions included drug overdose, personality disorders

Neuro --- not too heavily emphasized on my exam; most questions were accompanied by an image. About half of my questions were about blood supplies. I had one question on a pathway that I'd never even heard of.

Biostats --- simple calculations; this was the only time when I needed calculate anything (never had any questions requiring those renal/cardio/drug dosage calculations)

Path/Phys --- LOTS of heme/onc with images of blood smears and bone marrow biopsies (including funky kinds of NHL). Lots of images of everything else (gross, CT, MRI). Not much in the way of pure cardiac or renal pathology, but I did get a few questions involving RAAS manipulations with certain disease states.

Last night I had my brother randomly flip through First Aid and ask me questions (he did a pretty good job for someone non-medical) --- there was one question in the first block that I WOULD NOT have gotten right if he hadn't quizzed me!

Q-Bank: averaged 73% (50% complete)
--- started in early April --- not as bad as some people think! It was a good learning tool. I stopped it mid-May to switch over to UW
UW: averaged 78% (62% complete)
--- probably the single most useful source after First Aid (if you put effort into going over your answers)
NBME 2: 253 (4 weeks before exam)
NBME 4: 265+ (2 weeks before exam)
NBME 3: 257 (week of exam) --- this one represented the difficulty of the real test most closely

Hoping to break 250 on the real thing, but strange things can happen on test day! 😉
 
Just got back 30 minutes ago! I want to write this while everything is still fresh.
......
Hoping to break 250 on the real thing, but strange things can happen on test day! 😉
Thanks, that was helpful. Sounds like you have a great chance at 250.
 
Has anyone seen any question on Herbal Agents. I've not studied anything on it and i don't wanna waste time studying something that is not high yield since i have less than 72hrs to take this exam.
 
I took the exam on Friday -- I must say, it was not as bad as I though it would be. I won't speculate about my score, but the questions were pretty much like USMLE World with a few easy ones thrown in.

I got to the test center at about 7:25 and was able to start my exam immediately. I didn't have any trouble with distractions in the room until the second half when they put a guy next to me who kept clearing his throat every minute or so and cracking his knuckles, but I could have put on the ear muff things if it had really been bothering me. It was also really nice to be comfortable with the look and mechanics of the test -- UW simulates FRED almost perfectly. I basically did the blocks two at a time with a break in between each set of two. I had a nice relaxed lunch (well, as relaxed as it could be), ended each block only about a minute or 2 early and ended up with an extra 20-30 minutes of break time that I didn't use.

As far as my strategy, I had 3 weeks to study after finals and I didn't do any dedicated boards study before that except for an informal study group to go over the 150 released question (about 1.5 hours a week). I went through FA, and BRS path and phys by system and did a block of 50 random USMLE World questions almost every day. In the end I got through about 50% of UW, and I was averaging in the 60's (my score didn't really improve much..). If I had had more time I probably would have done a practice test through my school or an NBME to gauge how I was doing, but with only 3 weeks I just didn't want to take the time. I'm kind of a slacker, so don't take my strategy to heart if you're aiming high...but I think (hope!) it worked out well for me.

To answer a few questions -- Glycerine -- I believe all the scores from previous tests are listed on your score report to residencies, and if you pass, you are not allowed to take the test again to try to improve your score. I think your response to a question would be counted if you clicked it before your time ran out.

I did have one question on porphyria, which I had just reviewed the day before..but I didn't have a clue. 🙁 I didn't have any on herbal agents, but it might be worth just glancing at. One that's probably worth knowing is St. John's Wort since it's a p450 inducer (but that's probably all you'd have to know about it!).
 
Last edited:
yeah, thats great.. but strange. Your UW and Qbank scores are more along the lines of your actual score and your NBMEs are a little low. Thats the reverse of how most people end up... But congrats! Any reason why that happened?
'0
im not sure why..but i always score lower on practive tests. Example: MCAT i always scores between 25-28..but i got a 30 on the real thing... besides getting a lower score on a practice exam increases my anxiety which i convert into motivation....🙂
 
niiice improvement. and congrats on the solid score. 👍 did you walk out of there thinking you may have hit 230+, or that u did significantly better than the most recent nbme?

nope..truthfully i thought it was a fair exam when i walked out..but at the same time i thought that i would have to get more right because there were easier questions....
 
Thanks to all on the forums for their advice, I'd like to just pass along bits of my own exam and study experience to say that it IS doable.

I had about 6 weeks to study and my go to book was First Aid. My other books were RR Path, BRS Path, and BRS Phys. TRUST ME, for pharm, all you need to know is from First Aid. Know it forwards and backwards. Don't pay heed to what UW or Kaplan says you ought to know about pharm, those services are nit picky and scare you into submission. I read First Aid once to get familiarized. Then split into the organ systems and read FA yet again but with BRS path and phys and also RR Path! I really liked that book and used it for the more difficult organ systems (for me, Cardio and Neuro path), looking back I wish I used it more but I bought it a little later on. It really is good. With about two weeks left, I only read First Aid concentrating more on Micro and Pharm. FA was GREAT and Godsend, you'll see my references throughout. Also, *his* 36pg HY notes were great the day before my exam. After about 3pm, I said STOP and just hung out, watched a movie, and attempted to rest the night before.

Now my exam. Man oh man, I was more scared going into it than doing it. If anything, it felt unreal thinking about all the prep and the many hours for 7 cruddy blocks. In my humble opinion, I felt the blocks and question styles were really "all over the map." My first block, oddly enough, felt the easiest. The second one was more challenging and after that, it was a mix. Just make sure you use the restroom in between blocks, don't over hydrate and you'll finish in time. Some things I remembered about my exam:

Anatomy: surprisingly, the anatomy in FA was quite sufficient. What was interesting was that once in awhile (like twice a block) I'd get one question followed by another similar question! This occurred with upper extremity and it was VERY approachable-- woman gives birth to a child and it was a long labor, the baby's hand is pronated, etc (Erb's Palsy). The questions are VERY classic presentation you'd see in FA and like every other med book. Lower extremity also. The only zingers, for me (cuz I HATE these) are CT scans of the mediastinum.

Pharm: was VERY approachable! I did not have a structure on my exam (but some of my friends did) and I felt that FA and Clinical Micro's methods were very sufficient. The typical questions were, "a patient is on W, X, Y, and Z for ____ cancer and he's got a cardiomyopathy..." (doxorubicin). What I noticed about the questions were that for the most part, they would give a typical clinical presentation and then give the diagnosis. Then ask a phys, path, pharm question.

Genetics: a few pedigree questions then they'd ask about genetic principles (penetrance, pleotropism, codominance, etc). I honestly did not get a Hardy Weinberg type question. I'd get the "CF has a very high incidence" and get like a genetics principles question about it. I'd say that FA and maybe BRS Molecular Bio were ok for it (I didn't "use" that book, but glanced through a friends copy, don't go out and buy it BTW).

Molecular Bio/Biochem: since I was a biochem major, I reveled in these questions. Unfortunately, there were a good number of these questions. Some would be straightforward, "you need to amplify this gene 1800 times, what method would be the best?" (PCR) and others would be more obscure where they'd talk about one of those AR diseases and ask you a question on the Rate limiting enzyme. I got a porphyria question but it was like: "kid is anemic, marrow shows ringed sideroblasts, what's he got?" and none of the other choices besides porphyrias makes sense. I got the frutcose intolerance/fructosuria questions, but if you used FA for it, you'd get it!

Micro: I only got stuck on viruses. Alot of bacteria (and thank the Lord, I used FA's "if all else fails, these are the bugs" on a few questions!), when in doubt Staph aureus. I got only one question where they'd describe you a viral infection, and you had to choose between the "SS+RNA, SS-RNA, DS DNA, DS DNA, or DS RNA." That was only one question too, so it was very approachable. Got like five parasite questions and how you would treat them. Since I hated micro, I spent a day a week just reviewing this only. I'd put the other books aside, and spend like four hours just going over bugs and drugs. Clinical Micro was a gem early on, but by the last two weeks, I was using FA to solidify and it helped tremendously.

Behav Sci/Epi/Psych: psych questions were really straighforward, know your defense mechanisms, your criteria for bipolar (manic episode), major depressive (SIG E CAPS), and schizo- phreniform/phrenia/affective and brief psychotic episodes and you'll easily make the right answer choice. For epi, FA was great, except I got that one evil question about how changing the diagnostic criteria would affect Sen. and Spec. Behav sci (ethics) was tough. Even after reading FA and dabbling with Kaplan's and BRS Behav, the answer choices were not to my liking at times. Just try your best there, I'm apparently not going to be a compassionate doctor.

The organ systems: path was integrated well, but they'd make it obvious what diseases you'll get. You get the MI case, you get the Crohn's versus UC cases, you get the Brain tumors cases, you EVEN get the Krukenburg tumor, the Barrett's, etc. Honestly, I felt that the organ systems in BRS Path were very well done.

My other weakness was Respiratory and that's what stuck out to me as challenging. Uggghhh, there was more than one question about V/Q mismatch and also about those stupid Capacities and Volumes. I got the emphysema phys and path questions, no coal workers or anything, got some restrictive, and of course the saddle embolus! Also the descriptions of FEV1/FVC ratios and nailed those. All thanks to FA.

To make a long story short, for the organ systems, if you can identify the (textbook) diagnoses you are GOLDEN! The questions seemed approachable for the path or phys. As Goljan puts it, "they give it to you in the question!!!" For instance, you'd get like a radiograph of someone with diverticula (and you'd see it!) and then ask you a simple question where there would be a 75 yo female who develops left lower quadrant pain. And the question would be "what's the diagnosis?" or they may ask, "what's true about the histology" (not all three germ layers), doesn't get more complicated than that.

Since everyone is disclosing it, I did the 150q (86%) two days before my exam, and I got 620 on my NBME form 3 (four days before). My Kaplan average was like 69% overall and towards the end I got mid 70's and a few 80s (a few...). I'll let this forum know my exam score, but I just want to thank SDN for all its help. You guys are amazing and we are going to be the new face of medicine, let's all just give a big sigh of relief and go for a nice drink to celebrate overcoming one of the more challenging hurdles (besides Matching I guess). Congratulations future colleagues and best of luck to those who have not taken the exam!
 
Did you make a 270 or are you hoping to. If you did, I''ll buy you a mercedes cuz you rock. If you' re still hoping to, i''ll pray for you.
haha, what billybama said, unfortunately!

Me, I'd love a 220+... but keep praying for me anyway, ok? 😀
 
I finished the exam yesterday. Im still just in a state of euphoria and aftershock. I shall post more about my experiences soon after I recover. Good luck to those remaining! 👍

And now, what youve all been waiting for: My story...

I had exactly 4 weeks between the end of final exams and my Step 1 date (last friday). I planned to take the weekend off and start studying again by monday, or tuesday latest. That didnt turn out so well, as I got sick on Monday (my body was probably weakened from the stress of final exam studying). I had to spend the rest of the week searching for apts downtown where I would be living next year. That all got wrapped up by Friday, giving me 3 weeks.

After that, I really started to get serious. I read through First Aid twice. Youd be surprised how fast you can get through it if youre really in the zone. I supplemented it with various other sources (ie, BRS Path, Physio, Clinical Micro Made Ridiculously Easy, class notes, etc). I finished all of qbank (not including IV) and took the Qbank practice exam. I took the free NBME exam and did exceedingly well. I then took 2 paid NBME exams (Forms 2, 3) and hit around the national avg on both. I did slightly worse on 3, but not significantly worse.

Exactly one week before the exam was when I started to burn out. Every day after that got harder and harder to study. I would have taken it a few days earlier if I had the choice. Finally by Wed evening, I had had it. I couldnt do it anymore, so I just spent the night resting. Thursday, I just sat on my ass, watched a movie, did some errands, and was driven down by my friend in the evening. I crashed at his place, which was down the street from the test center and hoped for the best.

The morning of, I woke up around 6:40, not knowing that within an hour, I would be starting the exam... I showered, got dressed, and took a cab to the test center. I got there around 7:25, and figured Id have an hour to skim through BRS and get my mind jogging. Surprisingly, within 10 minutes, the woman at the center told me that she could get my computer ready if I was up for it.

I did the first 2 blocks with no break. I then took about a 7-10 minute break, used the restroom, inhaled a nutri-grain bar or 2, washed it down, then went back in. I did sections 3 and 4 back to back with no break. Then I took 5 minute breaks after each block, doing the same thing. Nutrigrain bar, water, maybe a bit of caffeine, and then back for more. I figured that it would be better to eat a little bit constantly rather than have one big meal, and I was right. I didnt get food coma, I wasnt slowed down toward the end of the exam, and I wasnt starving either. By 2:15 PM, I had finished. From that moment on, euphoria ensued... 😀

As far as the test goes, I want to start by saying that its something you will never know how well you are prepared or how ready you are until after the fact. I had talked to so many M3s about their experiences throughout the year, I had talked to some of my friends right after they finished their exams, a few days before my exam. And still, I arrived at the test center not truly knowing what to expect. Overall, I would say that the test was very similar to the paid NBME exams I took, maybe slightly harder. I happened to end up with more behavioural science, particularly patient interaction stuff, than I had originally thought. I am a bit weary of giving information on subject material, because it really does vary from test to test and I wouldnt want to mislead anyone based on my own personal experiences.

Finally, I want to reassure everyone that this test is very doable. One thing most people dont realize is that this is a Licensing exam. Its true intent is to test a minimal level of competency. As such, there are going to be ALOT of fairly straightfoward, easy questions. You will have your share of tricky ones, as this will separate the good students from the best students. But it is a fair test for the most part. There's no reason you cant do well if youve been keeping up with the work and putting the time it.

Im sure you guys will all do great. Best of luck to everyone still remaining! 👍👍
 
And time to add myself into the history books...

Wow, where to start... I got to the test center at 8:30. I wanted to feel as comfortable as possible so I wore scrub pants, a t shirt, and flip flops to the exam. As soon as i step out of my car, the front of my flip flop catches the concrete and SNAP. A blowout that even Jimmy Buffet would be proud of. Fortunately for 7 hours I was sitting down, but im sure it was quite comical to see me slothing around on breaks, dragging the left foot so the flip flop wouldnt come off. I swear the old guy at the check in table felt sorry for me because he thought I was some kind of cripple.

The exam in a nutshell as many others have stated: definitely do-able. I studied for 5 weeks using basically just FA as a reading source and QBank, USMLERx, and UWorld. The sunday before the test I took NBME form 2 and I would have to say it was very comparable to the real exam. The hardest of the questions seemed most like UWorld, and then there were more than a handful of questions like the 150 Free. Overall I would have to put the questions into 3 categories:
1) Read the question or even just part of it, and immediately know/pick the answer
2) Read the question and know whats going on, but then have to choose between 2 formidable answer choices
3) Read the question, know what is going on, but still have no clue what the answer is and end up having to make a guess out of 3 or 4 choices (this typically occured when all the answer choices were histological descriptions of something - ugh!)
I really only got 1 WTF question, and didnt care enough to spend any time on it (or remember what it was for that matter). Other than this, the questions always led you to a logical association and answer choices.

The test flew by. I finished each block with approximately 15 minutes left, and used those to go over marked questions. I only marked questions that i was less than 90% sure i had the right answer, or that I didnt want to spend time figuring out of the first pass through. So in an attempt to somehow quantify my results, i wrote down on my sheet after each block how many I had marked. Some of the marked ones you figure I would have gotten right, but there were probably a few that i thought i got right but were wrong - so i figure this is a decent but rough attempt at approximation, with the number of marked questions equaling the number i got wrong for each block. Out of 50 for each block the count was as follows: 40, 40, 37, 41, 43, 41, 38.

Blocks 1,2 and 5 were pretty easy, it seemed like there were fewer complicating factors to the questions for whatever reason. Block 3 was the hardest. The last block i marked 12, but I wouldnt say it was because there were more difficult questions, it was just by that point the associations werent coming as quickly as they had been. I was having to spend more time on certain do-able questions, which left me less time to spend on the harder ones; therefore, more got marked as I was trying to make sure i got through them all.

Finally, I want to reassure everyone that this test is very doable. One thing most people dont realize is that this is a Licensing exam. Its true intent is to test a minimal level of competency. As such, there are going to be ALOT of fairly straightfoward, easy questions. You will have your share of tricky ones, as this will separate the good students from the best students. But it is a fair test for the most part. There's no reason you cant do well if youve been keeping up with the work and putting the time it.

I think praz summed this up nicely. As I did the Trendelenberg gait out of there, the old man probably tearing up behind me, I felt like I had done pretty well overall. Of course, there is nothing but speculation behind the scoring so my point count doesnt really help, but I'm hoping I reached my goal of 230. The NBME 2 i scored a 226 on after 4 weeks of studying. The last week I basically just reviewed my weak areas, and can think of 1 cardio and 1 resp phys question (FEV1 crap) I got right because of the reviewing - but other than that, the last week did nothing for me. I felt like I had peaked right after I took the NBME and was dragging all of last week. If your brain doesnt want you study anymore, its probably right, and youre as ready as youre going to be. Dont try to kill yourself at the very end because at that point, you know what you know and you just have to go with it.

Its funny, I almost feel cheated...5 weeks of studying - all just for that thing??? haha. I think I was expecting it to be more difficult, but I suppose I got lucky and there was a whole lot more on there that I knew than that I didnt know.

Well, I guess im off to read some first a....i mean, im gonna go do a random block of fif....i mean...er, can someone remind me what it is that you do when youre not studying for the step 1??? :hardy:
 
To: cubsrule4e

Thanks! Very reassuring post! I'm aiming for a 230-240 myself and I was wondering how you did on Qbank and UW.

I'm having a tough time getting much higher than lower-70% and I wasn't sure if I was in trouble or right on course. Thanks!
 
Congrats Matt......I'm just hoping for a pass!! PArty on.

When do you start 3rd year?
 
To: cubsrule4e

Thanks! Very reassuring post! I'm aiming for a 230-240 myself and I was wondering how you did on Qbank and UW.

I'm having a tough time getting much higher than lower-70% and I wasn't sure if I was in trouble or right on course. Thanks!

Ah...i knew i was leaving something out

I started with QBank the first 2 weeks, was hitting around 70-74%. The majority of the time was URx and UW. URx I did about 30%, was scoring in the 80s at the very end. UWorld i finished 60% of it and my overall score was 62%. Im not sure how representative this is compared to others because I was basically doing it as a learning tool. I did it systems based, i think most people just do random blocks. I wanted to study category by category, so there was no real trend in the scoring, except for the last week when my scores dipped because i was just so sick of studying i was losing concentration.

Mike: Orientation 6/29, 1st day 7/2....nice little break now, i was the first one of the class to take it (with 1 other guy)..screw studying, i wanted as long of a break as i could get 👍👍👍
 
Well, I have received so much help through others posting that I thought I would share what my experience was like today. First off, ONLY YOU know how you study best. It is easy to get scared from people saying you "have to take the Kaplan course" or "read First AID cover to cover". Unlike some people, I did not start out getting 70% on UW or Kaplan Qbank. I was in the 40-50%. I ONLY did questions-lots and lots. 14,000+. I did not read First aid nor did I take Kaplan. I did very well my first two years but feel that doing all of these questions worked best for me. If there is one thing I can't stress enough, is to figure out what works best for you and stick with it no matter what anyone says!! 🙂 Overall, I felt that the exam was very fair.
 
Well, I took the big test today. I took 5 weeks to study, used Goljan RR, FA, Micro and Immuno RR, HY Biochem, HY Cell and molecular, BRS Phys, and dabbled in a couple other things. Listened 2 goljan audio throughout the year to complement path class. Finished 25% of Kaplan Qbank and 90% of UWorld. I ended with 75% on Uworld, and only used kaplan qbank for systems based stuff. Took NBME 2 (2 weeks before) and scored 240. Shooting for a 240+ this time around.

I felt that the test was fair, and honestly I believe I overestimated the difficulty of the test. After doing almost all of Uworld, I felt like there was nothing on the test today that I hadn't seen, with the exception of a few strange (2-3) questions.

The test seemed fairly balanced by subject and system overall. I didn't feel a heavy emphasis on anything in terms of path and phys. There were about 2 biostats, 2 "what should you say next", 2 anatomy, 2 behavioral questions per block (I guess that's my rule of 2's). Nah it varied a little but most of the test was path, pathophys, pharm, and micro. I was surprised that there was just as much, if not a little more micro than pharm. Mostly bacterial. Micro is the one subject where I still think that they use buzzwords, because there's no other way of describing it. I only had 2 parasite questions (easy - diarrhea). No viruses. Only 7-8 of pure neuro questions. Even fewer embryo.

Overall, everything I saw today was on par with what people are saying in this thread. The test is doable. There won't be that many that are brainbusters. There are a few "knee jerk" questions sprinkled in here and there. UWorld's FRED format is exactly the same as the real thing, and their questions are only slightly harder than the real thing. I thought NBME form 2 was very representative of the real thing. Doing UWorld made this test seem easy, I dare say it felt like it has given us the upper hand, just as the goljan boom did a few years ago.

Good luck to all. Don't stress too much your last week. It's the hardest one. Just go over your weaknesses, and then relax. You may look at first aid and feel like you haven't read it or could memorize more, but trust me, you know it.🙂
 
Top