2009 DAT Bio comparison to Bootcamp and Qvault

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

byahnoob

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
307
Reaction score
183
Do any of you guys know the difficulty difference between the 3?
I just took the 2009 DAT exam and got a 21 on the Bio section, but im getting around 17-20 on BC and straight 17s on Qvault.

the 2009 DAT biology section seemed much more straightforward and clear.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Bio is hard to estimate what you will get on the real exam. Practice materials are usually all over the place so as long as you see the whole breadth your in the clear. Keep studying from various sources and expose yourself to everything and stop worrying about how your doing on those bio tests!
 
I'm asking about the difficulty in terms of question type and structure. The 2009 exam is so straightforward like no reasoning or application is even needed. Its basically like you know the info, you're good.
As for BC and Qvault, theres much more difficult questions that requires critical thinking.

i want to know if the Real DAT is similar to the 2009 exam, BC or vault.
 
Top