- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 82
Hey guys,
My exam is in 5 days and I decided to take the 2009 exam a little earlier since people say it is the best predictor of score (if any at all), and I can improve on any areas of weakness.
My scores were:
Bio 21
Chem 20
Ochem 19
PAT 22
RC 18
QR 17
TS 20
Made a few dumb mistakes but overall, not bad. I know people say that if you're scoring over 19 on sciences (or something like that) then you are on the right track. However, I wanted to see if anyone could tell me how the RC of the 2009 test compared to the real thing ? I use the highlighter when I do practice tests so I think that is part of the reason I didn't perform as well as I would have liked.
Also, is it worth it for me to go over the math questions I got wrong on this test or just review more current math questions from bootcamp/destroyer etc.
Thanks for any input.
My exam is in 5 days and I decided to take the 2009 exam a little earlier since people say it is the best predictor of score (if any at all), and I can improve on any areas of weakness.
My scores were:
Bio 21
Chem 20
Ochem 19
PAT 22
RC 18
QR 17
TS 20
Made a few dumb mistakes but overall, not bad. I know people say that if you're scoring over 19 on sciences (or something like that) then you are on the right track. However, I wanted to see if anyone could tell me how the RC of the 2009 test compared to the real thing ? I use the highlighter when I do practice tests so I think that is part of the reason I didn't perform as well as I would have liked.
Also, is it worth it for me to go over the math questions I got wrong on this test or just review more current math questions from bootcamp/destroyer etc.
Thanks for any input.